Cargando…
Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists
PURPOSE: This study aims to determine uveitis specialists’ practice patterns, preferences, and perceptions of corticosteroid-sparing therapies for the initial treatment of chronic noninfectious uveitis. METHODS: A survey was distributed to the American Uveitis Society and Proctor email listservs in...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22057810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0047-5 |
_version_ | 1782226709652701184 |
---|---|
author | Esterberg, Elizabeth Acharya, Nisha R. |
author_facet | Esterberg, Elizabeth Acharya, Nisha R. |
author_sort | Esterberg, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aims to determine uveitis specialists’ practice patterns, preferences, and perceptions of corticosteroid-sparing therapies for the initial treatment of chronic noninfectious uveitis. METHODS: A survey was distributed to the American Uveitis Society and Proctor email listservs in order to restrict the respondents to specialists who likely have extensive experience in the use of immunomodulatory therapy. Topics included effectiveness, usage, and preferences related to seven immunomodulatory treatments. RESULTS: Among the 45 responders, the majority (59%) had greater than 10 years of experience treating uveitis. Methotrexate was the most commonly used initial therapy for anterior, intermediate, and posterior/panuveitis (85%, 57%, and 37%), and the most preferred for anterior (55%). Mycophenolate mofetil was the most preferred for intermediate (35%) and posterior/panuveitis (42%). Primary reasons not to prescribe a treatment were effectiveness for azathioprine, safety/tolerability for cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide, and a mixture of cost, safety/tolerability, and difficulty of administration for the biologic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Within the group of highly experienced uveitis specialists, methotrexate is still the most commonly used initial treatment. Although newer biologic drugs are seen as effective, they are not commonly used, or even preferred, as initial corticosteroid-sparing treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3302992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33029922012-03-22 Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists Esterberg, Elizabeth Acharya, Nisha R. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect Original Research PURPOSE: This study aims to determine uveitis specialists’ practice patterns, preferences, and perceptions of corticosteroid-sparing therapies for the initial treatment of chronic noninfectious uveitis. METHODS: A survey was distributed to the American Uveitis Society and Proctor email listservs in order to restrict the respondents to specialists who likely have extensive experience in the use of immunomodulatory therapy. Topics included effectiveness, usage, and preferences related to seven immunomodulatory treatments. RESULTS: Among the 45 responders, the majority (59%) had greater than 10 years of experience treating uveitis. Methotrexate was the most commonly used initial therapy for anterior, intermediate, and posterior/panuveitis (85%, 57%, and 37%), and the most preferred for anterior (55%). Mycophenolate mofetil was the most preferred for intermediate (35%) and posterior/panuveitis (42%). Primary reasons not to prescribe a treatment were effectiveness for azathioprine, safety/tolerability for cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide, and a mixture of cost, safety/tolerability, and difficulty of administration for the biologic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Within the group of highly experienced uveitis specialists, methotrexate is still the most commonly used initial treatment. Although newer biologic drugs are seen as effective, they are not commonly used, or even preferred, as initial corticosteroid-sparing treatment. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3302992/ /pubmed/22057810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0047-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Esterberg, Elizabeth Acharya, Nisha R. Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists |
title | Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists |
title_full | Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists |
title_fullStr | Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists |
title_full_unstemmed | Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists |
title_short | Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists |
title_sort | corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22057810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0047-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT esterbergelizabeth corticosteroidsparingtherapypracticepatternsamonguveitisspecialists AT acharyanishar corticosteroidsparingtherapypracticepatternsamonguveitisspecialists |