Cargando…

Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine uveitis specialists’ practice patterns, preferences, and perceptions of corticosteroid-sparing therapies for the initial treatment of chronic noninfectious uveitis. METHODS: A survey was distributed to the American Uveitis Society and Proctor email listservs in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esterberg, Elizabeth, Acharya, Nisha R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22057810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0047-5
_version_ 1782226709652701184
author Esterberg, Elizabeth
Acharya, Nisha R.
author_facet Esterberg, Elizabeth
Acharya, Nisha R.
author_sort Esterberg, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to determine uveitis specialists’ practice patterns, preferences, and perceptions of corticosteroid-sparing therapies for the initial treatment of chronic noninfectious uveitis. METHODS: A survey was distributed to the American Uveitis Society and Proctor email listservs in order to restrict the respondents to specialists who likely have extensive experience in the use of immunomodulatory therapy. Topics included effectiveness, usage, and preferences related to seven immunomodulatory treatments. RESULTS: Among the 45 responders, the majority (59%) had greater than 10 years of experience treating uveitis. Methotrexate was the most commonly used initial therapy for anterior, intermediate, and posterior/panuveitis (85%, 57%, and 37%), and the most preferred for anterior (55%). Mycophenolate mofetil was the most preferred for intermediate (35%) and posterior/panuveitis (42%). Primary reasons not to prescribe a treatment were effectiveness for azathioprine, safety/tolerability for cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide, and a mixture of cost, safety/tolerability, and difficulty of administration for the biologic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Within the group of highly experienced uveitis specialists, methotrexate is still the most commonly used initial treatment. Although newer biologic drugs are seen as effective, they are not commonly used, or even preferred, as initial corticosteroid-sparing treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3302992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33029922012-03-22 Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists Esterberg, Elizabeth Acharya, Nisha R. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect Original Research PURPOSE: This study aims to determine uveitis specialists’ practice patterns, preferences, and perceptions of corticosteroid-sparing therapies for the initial treatment of chronic noninfectious uveitis. METHODS: A survey was distributed to the American Uveitis Society and Proctor email listservs in order to restrict the respondents to specialists who likely have extensive experience in the use of immunomodulatory therapy. Topics included effectiveness, usage, and preferences related to seven immunomodulatory treatments. RESULTS: Among the 45 responders, the majority (59%) had greater than 10 years of experience treating uveitis. Methotrexate was the most commonly used initial therapy for anterior, intermediate, and posterior/panuveitis (85%, 57%, and 37%), and the most preferred for anterior (55%). Mycophenolate mofetil was the most preferred for intermediate (35%) and posterior/panuveitis (42%). Primary reasons not to prescribe a treatment were effectiveness for azathioprine, safety/tolerability for cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide, and a mixture of cost, safety/tolerability, and difficulty of administration for the biologic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Within the group of highly experienced uveitis specialists, methotrexate is still the most commonly used initial treatment. Although newer biologic drugs are seen as effective, they are not commonly used, or even preferred, as initial corticosteroid-sparing treatment. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3302992/ /pubmed/22057810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0047-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Esterberg, Elizabeth
Acharya, Nisha R.
Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists
title Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists
title_full Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists
title_fullStr Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists
title_full_unstemmed Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists
title_short Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists
title_sort corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3302992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22057810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0047-5
work_keys_str_mv AT esterbergelizabeth corticosteroidsparingtherapypracticepatternsamonguveitisspecialists
AT acharyanishar corticosteroidsparingtherapypracticepatternsamonguveitisspecialists