Cargando…

A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery

BACKGROUND: Adhesions lead to considerable patient morbidity and are a mounting burden on surgeons and the health care system alike. Although adhesion formation is the most frequent complication in abdominal and pelvic surgery, many surgeons are still not aware of the extent of the problem. To provi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirschelmann, Anja, Tchartchian, Garri, Wallwiener, Markus, Hackethal, Andreas, De Wilde, Rudy Leon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3303068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22037682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2097-1
_version_ 1782226716638314496
author Hirschelmann, Anja
Tchartchian, Garri
Wallwiener, Markus
Hackethal, Andreas
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
author_facet Hirschelmann, Anja
Tchartchian, Garri
Wallwiener, Markus
Hackethal, Andreas
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
author_sort Hirschelmann, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adhesions lead to considerable patient morbidity and are a mounting burden on surgeons and the health care system alike. Although adhesion formation is the most frequent complication in abdominal and pelvic surgery, many surgeons are still not aware of the extent of the problem. To provide the best care for their patients, surgeons should consistently inform themselves of anti-adhesion strategies and include these methods in their daily routine. METHODS: Searches were conducted in PubMed and The Cochrane Library to identify relevant literature. FINDINGS: Various complications are associated with adhesion formation, including small bowel obstruction, infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Increasingly, an understanding of adhesion formation as a complex process influenced by many different factors has led to various conceivable anti-adhesion strategies. At present, a number of different anti-adhesion agents are available. Although some agents have proved effective in reducing adhesion formation in randomised controlled trials, none of them can completely prevent adhesion formation. CONCLUSION: To fulfil our duty to provide best possible care for our patients, it is now time to regard adhesions as the most common complication in surgery. Further research is needed to fully understand adhesion formation and to develop new strategies for adhesion prevention. Large clinical efficacy trials of anti-adhesion agents will make it easier for surgeons to decide which agent to use in daily routine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3303068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33030682012-03-22 A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery Hirschelmann, Anja Tchartchian, Garri Wallwiener, Markus Hackethal, Andreas De Wilde, Rudy Leon Arch Gynecol Obstet General Gynecology BACKGROUND: Adhesions lead to considerable patient morbidity and are a mounting burden on surgeons and the health care system alike. Although adhesion formation is the most frequent complication in abdominal and pelvic surgery, many surgeons are still not aware of the extent of the problem. To provide the best care for their patients, surgeons should consistently inform themselves of anti-adhesion strategies and include these methods in their daily routine. METHODS: Searches were conducted in PubMed and The Cochrane Library to identify relevant literature. FINDINGS: Various complications are associated with adhesion formation, including small bowel obstruction, infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Increasingly, an understanding of adhesion formation as a complex process influenced by many different factors has led to various conceivable anti-adhesion strategies. At present, a number of different anti-adhesion agents are available. Although some agents have proved effective in reducing adhesion formation in randomised controlled trials, none of them can completely prevent adhesion formation. CONCLUSION: To fulfil our duty to provide best possible care for our patients, it is now time to regard adhesions as the most common complication in surgery. Further research is needed to fully understand adhesion formation and to develop new strategies for adhesion prevention. Large clinical efficacy trials of anti-adhesion agents will make it easier for surgeons to decide which agent to use in daily routine. Springer-Verlag 2011-10-30 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3303068/ /pubmed/22037682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2097-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Gynecology
Hirschelmann, Anja
Tchartchian, Garri
Wallwiener, Markus
Hackethal, Andreas
De Wilde, Rudy Leon
A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery
title A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery
title_full A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery
title_fullStr A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery
title_full_unstemmed A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery
title_short A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery
title_sort review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery
topic General Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3303068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22037682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2097-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hirschelmannanja areviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT tchartchiangarri areviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT wallwienermarkus areviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT hackethalandreas areviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT dewilderudyleon areviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT hirschelmannanja reviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT tchartchiangarri reviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT wallwienermarkus reviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT hackethalandreas reviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery
AT dewilderudyleon reviewoftheproblematicadhesionprophylaxisingynaecologicalsurgery