Cargando…
The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers
BACKGROUND: New oncology drugs are being developed in conjunction with companion diagnostics with approval restricting their use to certain biomarker-positive subgroups. We examined the impact of different predictive biomarker screening techniques and population enrichment criteria on the cost-effec...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3304427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22374459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.60 |
_version_ | 1782226901458223104 |
---|---|
author | Atherly, A J Camidge, D R |
author_facet | Atherly, A J Camidge, D R |
author_sort | Atherly, A J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: New oncology drugs are being developed in conjunction with companion diagnostics with approval restricting their use to certain biomarker-positive subgroups. We examined the impact of different predictive biomarker screening techniques and population enrichment criteria on the cost-effectiveness of targeted drugs in lung cancer, using ALK and crizotinib to build the initial model. METHODS: Health economic modeling of cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year was based on literature review and expert opinion. The modeled population represented advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), eligible for predictive biomarker screening with prescribing restricted to biomarker-positive patients. RESULTS: For assays costing $1400 per person, cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for ALK screening all advanced NSCLC, excluding treatment cost, is $106 707. This falls to $4756 when only a highly enriched population is screened (increasing biomarker frequency from 1.6 to 35.9%). However, the same enrichment involves missing 56% patients who segregate within the unscreened group. Cheaper screening tests that miss some true positives can be more cost-effective if proportional reductions in cost exceed proportion of subjects missed. Generic modeling of idealised screening assays, including treatment cost, reveals a dominant effect of screening cost per person at low biomarker frequencies. Cost-effectiveness of <$100 000 per QALY gained is not achievable at biomarker frequencies <5% (with drug costs $1–5000 per month and screening costs $600–1400 per person). INTERPRETATION: Cost-effectiveness of oncology drugs whose prescribing is restricted to biomarker-positive subgroups should address the cost of detecting marker-positive patients. The cost of screening dominates at low frequencies and strategies to improve cost-effectiveness based on the assay cost, drug cost and the group screened should be considered in these scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3304427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33044272013-03-13 The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers Atherly, A J Camidge, D R Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: New oncology drugs are being developed in conjunction with companion diagnostics with approval restricting their use to certain biomarker-positive subgroups. We examined the impact of different predictive biomarker screening techniques and population enrichment criteria on the cost-effectiveness of targeted drugs in lung cancer, using ALK and crizotinib to build the initial model. METHODS: Health economic modeling of cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year was based on literature review and expert opinion. The modeled population represented advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), eligible for predictive biomarker screening with prescribing restricted to biomarker-positive patients. RESULTS: For assays costing $1400 per person, cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for ALK screening all advanced NSCLC, excluding treatment cost, is $106 707. This falls to $4756 when only a highly enriched population is screened (increasing biomarker frequency from 1.6 to 35.9%). However, the same enrichment involves missing 56% patients who segregate within the unscreened group. Cheaper screening tests that miss some true positives can be more cost-effective if proportional reductions in cost exceed proportion of subjects missed. Generic modeling of idealised screening assays, including treatment cost, reveals a dominant effect of screening cost per person at low biomarker frequencies. Cost-effectiveness of <$100 000 per QALY gained is not achievable at biomarker frequencies <5% (with drug costs $1–5000 per month and screening costs $600–1400 per person). INTERPRETATION: Cost-effectiveness of oncology drugs whose prescribing is restricted to biomarker-positive subgroups should address the cost of detecting marker-positive patients. The cost of screening dominates at low frequencies and strategies to improve cost-effectiveness based on the assay cost, drug cost and the group screened should be considered in these scenarios. Nature Publishing Group 2012-03-13 2012-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3304427/ /pubmed/22374459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.60 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Atherly, A J Camidge, D R The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers |
title | The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers |
title_full | The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers |
title_fullStr | The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers |
title_full_unstemmed | The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers |
title_short | The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3304427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22374459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.60 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atherlyaj thecosteffectivenessofscreeninglungcancerpatientsfortargeteddrugsensitivitymarkers AT camidgedr thecosteffectivenessofscreeninglungcancerpatientsfortargeteddrugsensitivitymarkers AT atherlyaj costeffectivenessofscreeninglungcancerpatientsfortargeteddrugsensitivitymarkers AT camidgedr costeffectivenessofscreeninglungcancerpatientsfortargeteddrugsensitivitymarkers |