Cargando…

Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients

BACKGROUND: Despite the well documented advantages of hospice care, most terminally ill patients do not reap the maximum benefit from hospice services, with the majority of them receiving hospice care either prematurely or delayed. Decision systems to improve the hospice referral process are sorely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsalatsanis, Athanasios, Barnes, Laura E, Hozo, Iztok, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22196308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-77
_version_ 1782227059943145472
author Tsalatsanis, Athanasios
Barnes, Laura E
Hozo, Iztok
Djulbegovic, Benjamin
author_facet Tsalatsanis, Athanasios
Barnes, Laura E
Hozo, Iztok
Djulbegovic, Benjamin
author_sort Tsalatsanis, Athanasios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the well documented advantages of hospice care, most terminally ill patients do not reap the maximum benefit from hospice services, with the majority of them receiving hospice care either prematurely or delayed. Decision systems to improve the hospice referral process are sorely needed. METHODS: We present a novel theoretical framework that is based on well-established methodologies of prognostication and decision analysis to assist with the hospice referral process for terminally ill patients. We linked the SUPPORT statistical model, widely regarded as one of the most accurate models for prognostication of terminally ill patients, with the recently developed regret based decision curve analysis (regret DCA). We extend the regret DCA methodology to consider harms associated with the prognostication test as well as harms and effects of the management strategies. In order to enable patients and physicians in making these complex decisions in real-time, we developed an easily accessible web-based decision support system available at the point of care. RESULTS: The web-based decision support system facilitates the hospice referral process in three steps. First, the patient or surrogate is interviewed to elicit his/her personal preferences regarding the continuation of life-sustaining treatment vs. palliative care. Then, regret DCA is employed to identify the best strategy for the particular patient in terms of threshold probability at which he/she is indifferent between continuation of treatment and of hospice referral. Finally, if necessary, the probabilities of survival and death for the particular patient are computed based on the SUPPORT prognostication model and contrasted with the patient's threshold probability. The web-based design of the CDSS enables patients, physicians, and family members to participate in the decision process from anywhere internet access is available. CONCLUSIONS: We present a theoretical framework to facilitate the hospice referral process. Further rigorous clinical evaluation including testing in a prospective randomized controlled trial is required and planned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3305393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33053932012-03-16 Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients Tsalatsanis, Athanasios Barnes, Laura E Hozo, Iztok Djulbegovic, Benjamin BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the well documented advantages of hospice care, most terminally ill patients do not reap the maximum benefit from hospice services, with the majority of them receiving hospice care either prematurely or delayed. Decision systems to improve the hospice referral process are sorely needed. METHODS: We present a novel theoretical framework that is based on well-established methodologies of prognostication and decision analysis to assist with the hospice referral process for terminally ill patients. We linked the SUPPORT statistical model, widely regarded as one of the most accurate models for prognostication of terminally ill patients, with the recently developed regret based decision curve analysis (regret DCA). We extend the regret DCA methodology to consider harms associated with the prognostication test as well as harms and effects of the management strategies. In order to enable patients and physicians in making these complex decisions in real-time, we developed an easily accessible web-based decision support system available at the point of care. RESULTS: The web-based decision support system facilitates the hospice referral process in three steps. First, the patient or surrogate is interviewed to elicit his/her personal preferences regarding the continuation of life-sustaining treatment vs. palliative care. Then, regret DCA is employed to identify the best strategy for the particular patient in terms of threshold probability at which he/she is indifferent between continuation of treatment and of hospice referral. Finally, if necessary, the probabilities of survival and death for the particular patient are computed based on the SUPPORT prognostication model and contrasted with the patient's threshold probability. The web-based design of the CDSS enables patients, physicians, and family members to participate in the decision process from anywhere internet access is available. CONCLUSIONS: We present a theoretical framework to facilitate the hospice referral process. Further rigorous clinical evaluation including testing in a prospective randomized controlled trial is required and planned. BioMed Central 2011-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3305393/ /pubmed/22196308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-77 Text en Copyright ©2011 Tsalatsanis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tsalatsanis, Athanasios
Barnes, Laura E
Hozo, Iztok
Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients
title Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients
title_full Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients
title_fullStr Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients
title_full_unstemmed Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients
title_short Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients
title_sort extensions to regret-based decision curve analysis: an application to hospice referral for terminal patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22196308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-77
work_keys_str_mv AT tsalatsanisathanasios extensionstoregretbaseddecisioncurveanalysisanapplicationtohospicereferralforterminalpatients
AT barneslaurae extensionstoregretbaseddecisioncurveanalysisanapplicationtohospicereferralforterminalpatients
AT hozoiztok extensionstoregretbaseddecisioncurveanalysisanapplicationtohospicereferralforterminalpatients
AT djulbegovicbenjamin extensionstoregretbaseddecisioncurveanalysisanapplicationtohospicereferralforterminalpatients