Cargando…

Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda

BACKGROUND: Use of evidence in health policymaking plays an important role, especially in resource-constrained settings where informed decisions on resource allocation are paramount. Several knowledge translation (KT) models have been developed, but few have been applied to health policymaking in lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orem, Juliet Nabyonga, Mafigiri, David Kaawa, Marchal, Bruno, Ssengooba, Freddie, Macq, Jean, Criel, Bart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22316003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-109
_version_ 1782227092123942912
author Orem, Juliet Nabyonga
Mafigiri, David Kaawa
Marchal, Bruno
Ssengooba, Freddie
Macq, Jean
Criel, Bart
author_facet Orem, Juliet Nabyonga
Mafigiri, David Kaawa
Marchal, Bruno
Ssengooba, Freddie
Macq, Jean
Criel, Bart
author_sort Orem, Juliet Nabyonga
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Use of evidence in health policymaking plays an important role, especially in resource-constrained settings where informed decisions on resource allocation are paramount. Several knowledge translation (KT) models have been developed, but few have been applied to health policymaking in low income countries. If KT models are expected to explain evidence uptake and implementation, or lack of it, they must be contextualized and take into account the specificity of low income countries for example, the strong influence of donors. The main objective of this research is to elaborate a Middle Range Theory (MRT) of KT in Uganda that can also serve as a reference for other low- and middle income countries. METHODS: This two-step study employed qualitative approaches to examine the principal barriers and facilitating factors to KT. Step 1 involved a literature review and identification of common themes. The results informed the development of the initial MRT, which details the facilitating factors and barriers to KT at the different stages of research and policy development. In Step 2, these were further refined through key informant interviews with policymakers and researchers in Uganda. Deductive content and thematic analysis was carried out to assess the degree of convergence with the elements of the initial MRT and to identify other emerging issues. RESULTS: Review of the literature revealed that the most common emerging facilitating factors could be grouped under institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics, dissemination, partnerships and political context. The analysis of interviews, however, showed that policymakers and researchers ranked institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics and partnerships as the most important. New factors emphasized by respondents were the use of mainstreamed structures within MoH to coordinate and disseminate research, the separation of roles between researchers and policymakers, and the role of the community and civil society in KT. CONCLUSIONS: This study refined an initial MRT on KT in policymaking in the health sector in Uganda that was based on a literature review. It provides a framework that can be used in empirical research of the process of KT on specific policy issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3305540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33055402012-03-16 Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda Orem, Juliet Nabyonga Mafigiri, David Kaawa Marchal, Bruno Ssengooba, Freddie Macq, Jean Criel, Bart BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Use of evidence in health policymaking plays an important role, especially in resource-constrained settings where informed decisions on resource allocation are paramount. Several knowledge translation (KT) models have been developed, but few have been applied to health policymaking in low income countries. If KT models are expected to explain evidence uptake and implementation, or lack of it, they must be contextualized and take into account the specificity of low income countries for example, the strong influence of donors. The main objective of this research is to elaborate a Middle Range Theory (MRT) of KT in Uganda that can also serve as a reference for other low- and middle income countries. METHODS: This two-step study employed qualitative approaches to examine the principal barriers and facilitating factors to KT. Step 1 involved a literature review and identification of common themes. The results informed the development of the initial MRT, which details the facilitating factors and barriers to KT at the different stages of research and policy development. In Step 2, these were further refined through key informant interviews with policymakers and researchers in Uganda. Deductive content and thematic analysis was carried out to assess the degree of convergence with the elements of the initial MRT and to identify other emerging issues. RESULTS: Review of the literature revealed that the most common emerging facilitating factors could be grouped under institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics, dissemination, partnerships and political context. The analysis of interviews, however, showed that policymakers and researchers ranked institutional strengthening for KT, research characteristics and partnerships as the most important. New factors emphasized by respondents were the use of mainstreamed structures within MoH to coordinate and disseminate research, the separation of roles between researchers and policymakers, and the role of the community and civil society in KT. CONCLUSIONS: This study refined an initial MRT on KT in policymaking in the health sector in Uganda that was based on a literature review. It provides a framework that can be used in empirical research of the process of KT on specific policy issues. BioMed Central 2012-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3305540/ /pubmed/22316003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-109 Text en Copyright ©2012 Nabyonga Orem et al; BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Orem, Juliet Nabyonga
Mafigiri, David Kaawa
Marchal, Bruno
Ssengooba, Freddie
Macq, Jean
Criel, Bart
Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda
title Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda
title_full Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda
title_fullStr Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda
title_short Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda
title_sort research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22316003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-109
work_keys_str_mv AT oremjulietnabyonga researchevidenceandpolicymakingtheperspectivesofpolicyactorsonimprovinguptakeofevidenceinhealthpolicydevelopmentandimplementationinuganda
AT mafigiridavidkaawa researchevidenceandpolicymakingtheperspectivesofpolicyactorsonimprovinguptakeofevidenceinhealthpolicydevelopmentandimplementationinuganda
AT marchalbruno researchevidenceandpolicymakingtheperspectivesofpolicyactorsonimprovinguptakeofevidenceinhealthpolicydevelopmentandimplementationinuganda
AT ssengoobafreddie researchevidenceandpolicymakingtheperspectivesofpolicyactorsonimprovinguptakeofevidenceinhealthpolicydevelopmentandimplementationinuganda
AT macqjean researchevidenceandpolicymakingtheperspectivesofpolicyactorsonimprovinguptakeofevidenceinhealthpolicydevelopmentandimplementationinuganda
AT crielbart researchevidenceandpolicymakingtheperspectivesofpolicyactorsonimprovinguptakeofevidenceinhealthpolicydevelopmentandimplementationinuganda