Cargando…

Diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and type II diabetes. Lipoprotein diagnostics, such as LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, help to diagnose these diseases. Lipoprotein profile measurements could improve lipoprotein diagnostics, but interpretational co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Schalkwijk, Daniël B, van Ommen, Ben, Freidig, Andreas P, van der Greef, Jan, de Graaf, Albert A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22029862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-1-29
_version_ 1782227155011239936
author van Schalkwijk, Daniël B
van Ommen, Ben
Freidig, Andreas P
van der Greef, Jan
de Graaf, Albert A
author_facet van Schalkwijk, Daniël B
van Ommen, Ben
Freidig, Andreas P
van der Greef, Jan
de Graaf, Albert A
author_sort van Schalkwijk, Daniël B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and type II diabetes. Lipoprotein diagnostics, such as LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, help to diagnose these diseases. Lipoprotein profile measurements could improve lipoprotein diagnostics, but interpretational complexity has limited their clinical application to date. We have previously developed a computational model called Particle Profiler to interpret lipoprotein profiles. In the current study we further developed and calibrated Particle Profiler using subjects with specific genetic conditions. We subsequently performed technical validation and worked at an initial indication of clinical usefulness starting from available data on lipoprotein concentrations and metabolic fluxes. Since the model outcomes cannot be measured directly, the only available technical validation was corroboration. For an initial indication of clinical usefulness, pooled lipoprotein metabolic flux data was available from subjects with various types of dyslipidemia. Therefore we investigated how well lipoprotein metabolic ratios derived from Particle Profiler distinguished reported dyslipidemic from normolipidemic subjects. RESULTS: We found that the model could fit a range of normolipidemic and dyslipidemic subjects from fifteen out of sixteen studies equally well, with an average 8.8% ± 5.0% fit error; only one study showed a larger fit error. As initial indication of clinical usefulness, we showed that one diagnostic marker based on VLDL metabolic ratios better distinguished dyslipidemic from normolipidemic subjects than triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, or LDL cholesterol. The VLDL metabolic ratios outperformed each of the classical diagnostics separately; they also added power of distinction when included in a multivariate logistic regression model on top of the classical diagnostics. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we further developed, calibrated, and corroborated the Particle Profiler computational model using pooled lipoprotein metabolic flux data. From pooled lipoprotein metabolic flux data on dyslipidemic patients, we derived VLDL metabolic ratios that better distinguished normolipidemic from dyslipidemic subjects than standard diagnostics, including HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL cholesterol. Since dyslipidemias are closely linked to cardiovascular disease and diabetes type II development, lipoprotein metabolic ratios are candidate risk markers for these diseases. These ratios can in principle be obtained by applying Particle Profiler to a single lipoprotein profile measurement, which makes clinical application feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3305892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33058922012-03-16 Diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism van Schalkwijk, Daniël B van Ommen, Ben Freidig, Andreas P van der Greef, Jan de Graaf, Albert A J Clin Bioinforma Methodology BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and type II diabetes. Lipoprotein diagnostics, such as LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol, help to diagnose these diseases. Lipoprotein profile measurements could improve lipoprotein diagnostics, but interpretational complexity has limited their clinical application to date. We have previously developed a computational model called Particle Profiler to interpret lipoprotein profiles. In the current study we further developed and calibrated Particle Profiler using subjects with specific genetic conditions. We subsequently performed technical validation and worked at an initial indication of clinical usefulness starting from available data on lipoprotein concentrations and metabolic fluxes. Since the model outcomes cannot be measured directly, the only available technical validation was corroboration. For an initial indication of clinical usefulness, pooled lipoprotein metabolic flux data was available from subjects with various types of dyslipidemia. Therefore we investigated how well lipoprotein metabolic ratios derived from Particle Profiler distinguished reported dyslipidemic from normolipidemic subjects. RESULTS: We found that the model could fit a range of normolipidemic and dyslipidemic subjects from fifteen out of sixteen studies equally well, with an average 8.8% ± 5.0% fit error; only one study showed a larger fit error. As initial indication of clinical usefulness, we showed that one diagnostic marker based on VLDL metabolic ratios better distinguished dyslipidemic from normolipidemic subjects than triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, or LDL cholesterol. The VLDL metabolic ratios outperformed each of the classical diagnostics separately; they also added power of distinction when included in a multivariate logistic regression model on top of the classical diagnostics. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we further developed, calibrated, and corroborated the Particle Profiler computational model using pooled lipoprotein metabolic flux data. From pooled lipoprotein metabolic flux data on dyslipidemic patients, we derived VLDL metabolic ratios that better distinguished normolipidemic from dyslipidemic subjects than standard diagnostics, including HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL cholesterol. Since dyslipidemias are closely linked to cardiovascular disease and diabetes type II development, lipoprotein metabolic ratios are candidate risk markers for these diseases. These ratios can in principle be obtained by applying Particle Profiler to a single lipoprotein profile measurement, which makes clinical application feasible. BioMed Central 2011-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3305892/ /pubmed/22029862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-1-29 Text en Copyright ©2011 van Schalkwijk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
van Schalkwijk, Daniël B
van Ommen, Ben
Freidig, Andreas P
van der Greef, Jan
de Graaf, Albert A
Diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism
title Diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism
title_full Diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism
title_fullStr Diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism
title_short Diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism
title_sort diagnostic markers based on a computational model of lipoprotein metabolism
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22029862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2043-9113-1-29
work_keys_str_mv AT vanschalkwijkdanielb diagnosticmarkersbasedonacomputationalmodeloflipoproteinmetabolism
AT vanommenben diagnosticmarkersbasedonacomputationalmodeloflipoproteinmetabolism
AT freidigandreasp diagnosticmarkersbasedonacomputationalmodeloflipoproteinmetabolism
AT vandergreefjan diagnosticmarkersbasedonacomputationalmodeloflipoproteinmetabolism
AT degraafalberta diagnosticmarkersbasedonacomputationalmodeloflipoproteinmetabolism