Cargando…
HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). We evaluated the performance of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing in routine screening. METHODS: In all, 25 871 women (29–61) enrolled in our population-based...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22251922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.581 |
_version_ | 1782227165715103744 |
---|---|
author | Rijkaart, D C Berkhof, J van Kemenade, F J Coupe, V M H Rozendaal, L Heideman, D A M Verheijen, R H M Bulk, S Verweij, W Snijders, P J F Meijer, C J L M |
author_facet | Rijkaart, D C Berkhof, J van Kemenade, F J Coupe, V M H Rozendaal, L Heideman, D A M Verheijen, R H M Bulk, S Verweij, W Snijders, P J F Meijer, C J L M |
author_sort | Rijkaart, D C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). We evaluated the performance of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing in routine screening. METHODS: In all, 25 871 women (29–61) enrolled in our population-based cohort study were offered both cytology and hrHPV testing. High-risk HPV-positive women with normal cytology and an age-matched subcohort of hrHPV-negative women with normal cytology were invited for repeat testing after 1 and/or 2 years and were referred for colposcopy if they presented with abnormal cytology and/or a positive hrHPV test. The hrHPV-positive women with borderline or mild dyskaryosis (BMD) and all women with moderate dyskaryosis or worse (>BMD) were directly referred for colposcopy. Women with BMD and an hrHPV-negative test were advised to repeat cytology at 6 and 18 months and were referred for colposcopy if the repeat cytology test was abnormal. The main outcome measure was CIN grade 3 or worse (CIN3+). Results were adjusted for non-attendance at repeat testing. RESULTS: The hrHPV-positive women with abnormal cytology had a CIN3+ risk of 42.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 36.4–48.2), whereas the hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology had a much lower risk of 5.22% (95% CI: 3.72–7.91). In hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology, an additional cytology step after 1 year reduced the CIN3+ risk to only 1.6% (95% CI: 0.6–4.9) if the repeat test was normal. The CIN3+ risk in women with hrHPV-positive normal cytology was higher among women invited for the first time (29–33 years of age) (9.1% 95% CI: 5.6–14.3) than among older women (3.0% 95% CI: 1.5–5.5). CONCLUSION: Primary hrHPV screening with cytology triage in women aged ⩾30 years is an effective way to stratify women on CIN3+ risk and seems a feasible alternative to cytological screening. Repeat cytology after 1 year for hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology is however necessary before returning women to routine screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3305964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33059642013-02-28 HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications Rijkaart, D C Berkhof, J van Kemenade, F J Coupe, V M H Rozendaal, L Heideman, D A M Verheijen, R H M Bulk, S Verweij, W Snijders, P J F Meijer, C J L M Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). We evaluated the performance of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing in routine screening. METHODS: In all, 25 871 women (29–61) enrolled in our population-based cohort study were offered both cytology and hrHPV testing. High-risk HPV-positive women with normal cytology and an age-matched subcohort of hrHPV-negative women with normal cytology were invited for repeat testing after 1 and/or 2 years and were referred for colposcopy if they presented with abnormal cytology and/or a positive hrHPV test. The hrHPV-positive women with borderline or mild dyskaryosis (BMD) and all women with moderate dyskaryosis or worse (>BMD) were directly referred for colposcopy. Women with BMD and an hrHPV-negative test were advised to repeat cytology at 6 and 18 months and were referred for colposcopy if the repeat cytology test was abnormal. The main outcome measure was CIN grade 3 or worse (CIN3+). Results were adjusted for non-attendance at repeat testing. RESULTS: The hrHPV-positive women with abnormal cytology had a CIN3+ risk of 42.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 36.4–48.2), whereas the hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology had a much lower risk of 5.22% (95% CI: 3.72–7.91). In hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology, an additional cytology step after 1 year reduced the CIN3+ risk to only 1.6% (95% CI: 0.6–4.9) if the repeat test was normal. The CIN3+ risk in women with hrHPV-positive normal cytology was higher among women invited for the first time (29–33 years of age) (9.1% 95% CI: 5.6–14.3) than among older women (3.0% 95% CI: 1.5–5.5). CONCLUSION: Primary hrHPV screening with cytology triage in women aged ⩾30 years is an effective way to stratify women on CIN3+ risk and seems a feasible alternative to cytological screening. Repeat cytology after 1 year for hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology is however necessary before returning women to routine screening. Nature Publishing Group 2012-02-28 2012-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3305964/ /pubmed/22251922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.581 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Rijkaart, D C Berkhof, J van Kemenade, F J Coupe, V M H Rozendaal, L Heideman, D A M Verheijen, R H M Bulk, S Verweij, W Snijders, P J F Meijer, C J L M HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications |
title | HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications |
title_full | HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications |
title_fullStr | HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications |
title_full_unstemmed | HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications |
title_short | HPV DNA testing in population-based cervical screening (VUSA-Screen study): results and implications |
title_sort | hpv dna testing in population-based cervical screening (vusa-screen study): results and implications |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3305964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22251922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rijkaartdc hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT berkhofj hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT vankemenadefj hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT coupevmh hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT rozendaall hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT heidemandam hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT verheijenrhm hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT bulks hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT verweijw hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT snijderspjf hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications AT meijercjlm hpvdnatestinginpopulationbasedcervicalscreeningvusascreenstudyresultsandimplications |