Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function

Diabetes is a major cause of chronic kidney disease, and oral antidiabetic drugs are the mainstay of therapy for most patients with Type 2 diabetes. Here we evaluated their role on renal outcomes by using a national Veterans Administration database to assemble a retrospective cohort of 93,577 diabet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Adriana M, Roumie, Christianne L, Greevy, Robert A, Liu, Xulei, Grijalva, Carlos G, Murff, Harvey J, Ikizler, T Alp, Griffin, Marie R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22258320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.444
_version_ 1782227171112124416
author Hung, Adriana M
Roumie, Christianne L
Greevy, Robert A
Liu, Xulei
Grijalva, Carlos G
Murff, Harvey J
Ikizler, T Alp
Griffin, Marie R
author_facet Hung, Adriana M
Roumie, Christianne L
Greevy, Robert A
Liu, Xulei
Grijalva, Carlos G
Murff, Harvey J
Ikizler, T Alp
Griffin, Marie R
author_sort Hung, Adriana M
collection PubMed
description Diabetes is a major cause of chronic kidney disease, and oral antidiabetic drugs are the mainstay of therapy for most patients with Type 2 diabetes. Here we evaluated their role on renal outcomes by using a national Veterans Administration database to assemble a retrospective cohort of 93,577 diabetic patients who filled an incident oral antidiabetic drug prescription for metformin, sulfonylurea, or rosiglitazone, and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 ml/min or better. The primary composite outcome was a persistent decline in eGFR from baseline of 25% or more (eGFR event) or a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The secondary outcome was an eGFR event, ESRD, or death. Sensitivity analyses included using a more stringent definition of the eGFR event requiring an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) in addition to the 25% or more decline; controlling for baseline proteinuria thereby restricting data to 15,065 patients; and not requiring persistent treatment with the initial oral antidiabetic drug. Compared to patients using metformin, sulfonylurea users had an increased risk for both the primary and the secondary outcome, each with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.20. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main findings. The risk associated with rosiglitazone was similar to metformin for both outcomes. Thus, compared to metformin, oral antidiabetic drug treatment with sulfonylureas increased the risk of a decline in eGFR, ESRD, or death.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3306005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33060052012-03-16 Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function Hung, Adriana M Roumie, Christianne L Greevy, Robert A Liu, Xulei Grijalva, Carlos G Murff, Harvey J Ikizler, T Alp Griffin, Marie R Kidney Int Original Article Diabetes is a major cause of chronic kidney disease, and oral antidiabetic drugs are the mainstay of therapy for most patients with Type 2 diabetes. Here we evaluated their role on renal outcomes by using a national Veterans Administration database to assemble a retrospective cohort of 93,577 diabetic patients who filled an incident oral antidiabetic drug prescription for metformin, sulfonylurea, or rosiglitazone, and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 ml/min or better. The primary composite outcome was a persistent decline in eGFR from baseline of 25% or more (eGFR event) or a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The secondary outcome was an eGFR event, ESRD, or death. Sensitivity analyses included using a more stringent definition of the eGFR event requiring an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) in addition to the 25% or more decline; controlling for baseline proteinuria thereby restricting data to 15,065 patients; and not requiring persistent treatment with the initial oral antidiabetic drug. Compared to patients using metformin, sulfonylurea users had an increased risk for both the primary and the secondary outcome, each with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.20. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main findings. The risk associated with rosiglitazone was similar to metformin for both outcomes. Thus, compared to metformin, oral antidiabetic drug treatment with sulfonylureas increased the risk of a decline in eGFR, ESRD, or death. Nature Publishing Group 2012-04 2012-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3306005/ /pubmed/22258320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.444 Text en Copyright © 2012 International Society of Nephrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Hung, Adriana M
Roumie, Christianne L
Greevy, Robert A
Liu, Xulei
Grijalva, Carlos G
Murff, Harvey J
Ikizler, T Alp
Griffin, Marie R
Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function
title Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function
title_full Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function
title_short Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function
title_sort comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22258320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.444
work_keys_str_mv AT hungadrianam comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction
AT roumiechristiannel comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction
AT greevyroberta comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction
AT liuxulei comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction
AT grijalvacarlosg comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction
AT murffharveyj comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction
AT ikizlertalp comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction
AT griffinmarier comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction