Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function
Diabetes is a major cause of chronic kidney disease, and oral antidiabetic drugs are the mainstay of therapy for most patients with Type 2 diabetes. Here we evaluated their role on renal outcomes by using a national Veterans Administration database to assemble a retrospective cohort of 93,577 diabet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22258320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.444 |
_version_ | 1782227171112124416 |
---|---|
author | Hung, Adriana M Roumie, Christianne L Greevy, Robert A Liu, Xulei Grijalva, Carlos G Murff, Harvey J Ikizler, T Alp Griffin, Marie R |
author_facet | Hung, Adriana M Roumie, Christianne L Greevy, Robert A Liu, Xulei Grijalva, Carlos G Murff, Harvey J Ikizler, T Alp Griffin, Marie R |
author_sort | Hung, Adriana M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diabetes is a major cause of chronic kidney disease, and oral antidiabetic drugs are the mainstay of therapy for most patients with Type 2 diabetes. Here we evaluated their role on renal outcomes by using a national Veterans Administration database to assemble a retrospective cohort of 93,577 diabetic patients who filled an incident oral antidiabetic drug prescription for metformin, sulfonylurea, or rosiglitazone, and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 ml/min or better. The primary composite outcome was a persistent decline in eGFR from baseline of 25% or more (eGFR event) or a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The secondary outcome was an eGFR event, ESRD, or death. Sensitivity analyses included using a more stringent definition of the eGFR event requiring an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) in addition to the 25% or more decline; controlling for baseline proteinuria thereby restricting data to 15,065 patients; and not requiring persistent treatment with the initial oral antidiabetic drug. Compared to patients using metformin, sulfonylurea users had an increased risk for both the primary and the secondary outcome, each with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.20. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main findings. The risk associated with rosiglitazone was similar to metformin for both outcomes. Thus, compared to metformin, oral antidiabetic drug treatment with sulfonylureas increased the risk of a decline in eGFR, ESRD, or death. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3306005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33060052012-03-16 Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function Hung, Adriana M Roumie, Christianne L Greevy, Robert A Liu, Xulei Grijalva, Carlos G Murff, Harvey J Ikizler, T Alp Griffin, Marie R Kidney Int Original Article Diabetes is a major cause of chronic kidney disease, and oral antidiabetic drugs are the mainstay of therapy for most patients with Type 2 diabetes. Here we evaluated their role on renal outcomes by using a national Veterans Administration database to assemble a retrospective cohort of 93,577 diabetic patients who filled an incident oral antidiabetic drug prescription for metformin, sulfonylurea, or rosiglitazone, and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 ml/min or better. The primary composite outcome was a persistent decline in eGFR from baseline of 25% or more (eGFR event) or a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The secondary outcome was an eGFR event, ESRD, or death. Sensitivity analyses included using a more stringent definition of the eGFR event requiring an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) in addition to the 25% or more decline; controlling for baseline proteinuria thereby restricting data to 15,065 patients; and not requiring persistent treatment with the initial oral antidiabetic drug. Compared to patients using metformin, sulfonylurea users had an increased risk for both the primary and the secondary outcome, each with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.20. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main findings. The risk associated with rosiglitazone was similar to metformin for both outcomes. Thus, compared to metformin, oral antidiabetic drug treatment with sulfonylureas increased the risk of a decline in eGFR, ESRD, or death. Nature Publishing Group 2012-04 2012-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3306005/ /pubmed/22258320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.444 Text en Copyright © 2012 International Society of Nephrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hung, Adriana M Roumie, Christianne L Greevy, Robert A Liu, Xulei Grijalva, Carlos G Murff, Harvey J Ikizler, T Alp Griffin, Marie R Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function |
title | Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22258320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hungadrianam comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction AT roumiechristiannel comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction AT greevyroberta comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction AT liuxulei comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction AT grijalvacarlosg comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction AT murffharveyj comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction AT ikizlertalp comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction AT griffinmarier comparativeeffectivenessofincidentoralantidiabeticdrugsonkidneyfunction |