Cargando…

Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal

PURPOSE: To evaluate electroretinogram (ERG) changes after silicone oil removal. METHODS: Scotopic and photopic ERGs, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were checked before and shortly after silicone oil removal in eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy and silicone oil injection for com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azarmina, Mohsen, Soheilian, Masoud, Azarmina, Hossein, Hosseini, Bagher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454719
_version_ 1782227177905848320
author Azarmina, Mohsen
Soheilian, Masoud
Azarmina, Hossein
Hosseini, Bagher
author_facet Azarmina, Mohsen
Soheilian, Masoud
Azarmina, Hossein
Hosseini, Bagher
author_sort Azarmina, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate electroretinogram (ERG) changes after silicone oil removal. METHODS: Scotopic and photopic ERGs, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were checked before and shortly after silicone oil removal in eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy and silicone oil injection for complex retinal detachment. Pre- and postoperative ERG a- and b-wave amplitudes were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eyes of 28 patients including 20 male and 8 female subjects with mean age of 39.3 ± 0.06 (range, 12 to 85) years were studied. Mean interval from primary vitreoretinal surgery to silicone oil removal was 21.04 ± 0.52 (range, 7 to 39) months. Mean duration from silicone oil removal to second ERG was 13.04 ± 1.75 (range, 10 to 16) days. Before silicone oil removal, mean a-wave amplitudes in maximal combined response, rod response and cone response ERGs were 27.4 ± 19.9, 7.2 ± 4.5 and 5.5 ± 3.4 μv, respectively. These values increased to 48.8 ± 31.9, 15.1 ± 14.4 and 17.4 ± 22.2 μv, respectively after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001). Mean b-wave amplitudes in the same order, were 69.41 ± 51, 41.2 ± 30.4 and 25.1 ± 33.9 μv before silicone oil removal, increasing to 165.6 ± 102.5, 81.7 ± 53.7 and 44.7 ± 34.1 μv respectively, after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001). Mean BCVA significantly improved from 1.10 ± 0.34 at baseline to 1.02 ± 0.33 logMAR after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The amplitudes of ERG a- and b-waves under scotopic and photopic conditions increased significantly shortly after silicone oil removal. An increase in BCVA was also observed. These changes may be explained by the insulating effect of silicone oil on the retina.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3306082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33060822012-03-27 Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal Azarmina, Mohsen Soheilian, Masoud Azarmina, Hossein Hosseini, Bagher J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate electroretinogram (ERG) changes after silicone oil removal. METHODS: Scotopic and photopic ERGs, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were checked before and shortly after silicone oil removal in eyes that had previously undergone vitrectomy and silicone oil injection for complex retinal detachment. Pre- and postoperative ERG a- and b-wave amplitudes were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-eight eyes of 28 patients including 20 male and 8 female subjects with mean age of 39.3 ± 0.06 (range, 12 to 85) years were studied. Mean interval from primary vitreoretinal surgery to silicone oil removal was 21.04 ± 0.52 (range, 7 to 39) months. Mean duration from silicone oil removal to second ERG was 13.04 ± 1.75 (range, 10 to 16) days. Before silicone oil removal, mean a-wave amplitudes in maximal combined response, rod response and cone response ERGs were 27.4 ± 19.9, 7.2 ± 4.5 and 5.5 ± 3.4 μv, respectively. These values increased to 48.8 ± 31.9, 15.1 ± 14.4 and 17.4 ± 22.2 μv, respectively after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001). Mean b-wave amplitudes in the same order, were 69.41 ± 51, 41.2 ± 30.4 and 25.1 ± 33.9 μv before silicone oil removal, increasing to 165.6 ± 102.5, 81.7 ± 53.7 and 44.7 ± 34.1 μv respectively, after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001). Mean BCVA significantly improved from 1.10 ± 0.34 at baseline to 1.02 ± 0.33 logMAR after silicone oil removal (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The amplitudes of ERG a- and b-waves under scotopic and photopic conditions increased significantly shortly after silicone oil removal. An increase in BCVA was also observed. These changes may be explained by the insulating effect of silicone oil on the retina. Ophthalmic Research Center 2011-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3306082/ /pubmed/22454719 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Azarmina, Mohsen
Soheilian, Masoud
Azarmina, Hossein
Hosseini, Bagher
Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal
title Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal
title_full Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal
title_fullStr Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal
title_full_unstemmed Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal
title_short Electroretinogram Changes following Silicone Oil Removal
title_sort electroretinogram changes following silicone oil removal
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454719
work_keys_str_mv AT azarminamohsen electroretinogramchangesfollowingsiliconeoilremoval
AT soheilianmasoud electroretinogramchangesfollowingsiliconeoilremoval
AT azarminahossein electroretinogramchangesfollowingsiliconeoilremoval
AT hosseinibagher electroretinogramchangesfollowingsiliconeoilremoval