Cargando…

IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE: To compare keratometric measurements using a Javal type manual keratometer with IOLMaster in eyes undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: In this comparative case series, we studied patients aged 21 to 27 years scheduled for myopic PRK. Keratometry was performed pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razmju, Hasan, Rezaei, Leila, Nasrollahi, Kobra, Fesharaki, Hamid, Attarzadeh, Hossein, Footami, Farhad Janbaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454730
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To compare keratometric measurements using a Javal type manual keratometer with IOLMaster in eyes undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: In this comparative case series, we studied patients aged 21 to 27 years scheduled for myopic PRK. Keratometry was performed preoperatively and three months after the procedure using a Javal type manual keratometer and the IOLMaster. We compared postoperative measurements obtained by both instruments with the clinical history method (CHM). RESULTS: Seventy eyes of 35 patients with mean age of 23.45±1.55 years were studied. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was −4.53±1.3 D. Average preoperative IOLMaster and manual keratometric readings were 45.95±1.23 D and 46.32±1.18 D, respectively. Postoperatively, mean IOLMaster measurements was 38.03±0.68 D and that of manual keratometry was 43.15±1.1 D. Compared to CHM measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were −5.95 to −0.85 for the IOLMaster and −1.44 to 4.04 for manual keratometry. CONCLUSION: Keratometric measurements with the IOLMaster and a Javal type manual device are comparable after PRK; both are largely deviant from the CHM and can yield misleading results.