Cargando…

IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE: To compare keratometric measurements using a Javal type manual keratometer with IOLMaster in eyes undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: In this comparative case series, we studied patients aged 21 to 27 years scheduled for myopic PRK. Keratometry was performed pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razmju, Hasan, Rezaei, Leila, Nasrollahi, Kobra, Fesharaki, Hamid, Attarzadeh, Hossein, Footami, Farhad Janbaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454730
_version_ 1782227183795699712
author Razmju, Hasan
Rezaei, Leila
Nasrollahi, Kobra
Fesharaki, Hamid
Attarzadeh, Hossein
Footami, Farhad Janbaz
author_facet Razmju, Hasan
Rezaei, Leila
Nasrollahi, Kobra
Fesharaki, Hamid
Attarzadeh, Hossein
Footami, Farhad Janbaz
author_sort Razmju, Hasan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare keratometric measurements using a Javal type manual keratometer with IOLMaster in eyes undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: In this comparative case series, we studied patients aged 21 to 27 years scheduled for myopic PRK. Keratometry was performed preoperatively and three months after the procedure using a Javal type manual keratometer and the IOLMaster. We compared postoperative measurements obtained by both instruments with the clinical history method (CHM). RESULTS: Seventy eyes of 35 patients with mean age of 23.45±1.55 years were studied. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was −4.53±1.3 D. Average preoperative IOLMaster and manual keratometric readings were 45.95±1.23 D and 46.32±1.18 D, respectively. Postoperatively, mean IOLMaster measurements was 38.03±0.68 D and that of manual keratometry was 43.15±1.1 D. Compared to CHM measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were −5.95 to −0.85 for the IOLMaster and −1.44 to 4.04 for manual keratometry. CONCLUSION: Keratometric measurements with the IOLMaster and a Javal type manual device are comparable after PRK; both are largely deviant from the CHM and can yield misleading results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3306108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33061082012-03-27 IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy Razmju, Hasan Rezaei, Leila Nasrollahi, Kobra Fesharaki, Hamid Attarzadeh, Hossein Footami, Farhad Janbaz J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare keratometric measurements using a Javal type manual keratometer with IOLMaster in eyes undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: In this comparative case series, we studied patients aged 21 to 27 years scheduled for myopic PRK. Keratometry was performed preoperatively and three months after the procedure using a Javal type manual keratometer and the IOLMaster. We compared postoperative measurements obtained by both instruments with the clinical history method (CHM). RESULTS: Seventy eyes of 35 patients with mean age of 23.45±1.55 years were studied. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was −4.53±1.3 D. Average preoperative IOLMaster and manual keratometric readings were 45.95±1.23 D and 46.32±1.18 D, respectively. Postoperatively, mean IOLMaster measurements was 38.03±0.68 D and that of manual keratometry was 43.15±1.1 D. Compared to CHM measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were −5.95 to −0.85 for the IOLMaster and −1.44 to 4.04 for manual keratometry. CONCLUSION: Keratometric measurements with the IOLMaster and a Javal type manual device are comparable after PRK; both are largely deviant from the CHM and can yield misleading results. Ophthalmic Research Center 2011-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3306108/ /pubmed/22454730 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Razmju, Hasan
Rezaei, Leila
Nasrollahi, Kobra
Fesharaki, Hamid
Attarzadeh, Hossein
Footami, Farhad Janbaz
IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy
title IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_fullStr IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_full_unstemmed IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_short IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy
title_sort iolmaster versus manual keratometry after photorefractive keratectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454730
work_keys_str_mv AT razmjuhasan iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT rezaeileila iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT nasrollahikobra iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT fesharakihamid iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT attarzadehhossein iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy
AT footamifarhadjanbaz iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy