Cargando…
IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy
PURPOSE: To compare keratometric measurements using a Javal type manual keratometer with IOLMaster in eyes undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: In this comparative case series, we studied patients aged 21 to 27 years scheduled for myopic PRK. Keratometry was performed pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ophthalmic Research Center
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454730 |
_version_ | 1782227183795699712 |
---|---|
author | Razmju, Hasan Rezaei, Leila Nasrollahi, Kobra Fesharaki, Hamid Attarzadeh, Hossein Footami, Farhad Janbaz |
author_facet | Razmju, Hasan Rezaei, Leila Nasrollahi, Kobra Fesharaki, Hamid Attarzadeh, Hossein Footami, Farhad Janbaz |
author_sort | Razmju, Hasan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare keratometric measurements using a Javal type manual keratometer with IOLMaster in eyes undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: In this comparative case series, we studied patients aged 21 to 27 years scheduled for myopic PRK. Keratometry was performed preoperatively and three months after the procedure using a Javal type manual keratometer and the IOLMaster. We compared postoperative measurements obtained by both instruments with the clinical history method (CHM). RESULTS: Seventy eyes of 35 patients with mean age of 23.45±1.55 years were studied. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was −4.53±1.3 D. Average preoperative IOLMaster and manual keratometric readings were 45.95±1.23 D and 46.32±1.18 D, respectively. Postoperatively, mean IOLMaster measurements was 38.03±0.68 D and that of manual keratometry was 43.15±1.1 D. Compared to CHM measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were −5.95 to −0.85 for the IOLMaster and −1.44 to 4.04 for manual keratometry. CONCLUSION: Keratometric measurements with the IOLMaster and a Javal type manual device are comparable after PRK; both are largely deviant from the CHM and can yield misleading results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3306108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Ophthalmic Research Center |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33061082012-03-27 IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy Razmju, Hasan Rezaei, Leila Nasrollahi, Kobra Fesharaki, Hamid Attarzadeh, Hossein Footami, Farhad Janbaz J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare keratometric measurements using a Javal type manual keratometer with IOLMaster in eyes undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: In this comparative case series, we studied patients aged 21 to 27 years scheduled for myopic PRK. Keratometry was performed preoperatively and three months after the procedure using a Javal type manual keratometer and the IOLMaster. We compared postoperative measurements obtained by both instruments with the clinical history method (CHM). RESULTS: Seventy eyes of 35 patients with mean age of 23.45±1.55 years were studied. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was −4.53±1.3 D. Average preoperative IOLMaster and manual keratometric readings were 45.95±1.23 D and 46.32±1.18 D, respectively. Postoperatively, mean IOLMaster measurements was 38.03±0.68 D and that of manual keratometry was 43.15±1.1 D. Compared to CHM measurements, the 95% limits of agreement were −5.95 to −0.85 for the IOLMaster and −1.44 to 4.04 for manual keratometry. CONCLUSION: Keratometric measurements with the IOLMaster and a Javal type manual device are comparable after PRK; both are largely deviant from the CHM and can yield misleading results. Ophthalmic Research Center 2011-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3306108/ /pubmed/22454730 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Razmju, Hasan Rezaei, Leila Nasrollahi, Kobra Fesharaki, Hamid Attarzadeh, Hossein Footami, Farhad Janbaz IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy |
title | IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy |
title_full | IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy |
title_fullStr | IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy |
title_short | IOLMaster versus Manual Keratometry after Photorefractive Keratectomy |
title_sort | iolmaster versus manual keratometry after photorefractive keratectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22454730 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT razmjuhasan iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy AT rezaeileila iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy AT nasrollahikobra iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy AT fesharakihamid iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy AT attarzadehhossein iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy AT footamifarhadjanbaz iolmasterversusmanualkeratometryafterphotorefractivekeratectomy |