Cargando…

Visual Motion Responses in the Posterior Cingulate Sulcus: A Comparison to V5/MT and MST

Motion processing regions apart from V5+/MT+ are still relatively poorly understood. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to perform a detailed functional analysis of the recently described cingulate sulcus visual area (CSv) in the dorsal posterior cingulate cortex. We used distinct t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Elvira, Bülthoff, Heinrich H., Logothetis, Nikos K., Bartels, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21709176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr154
_version_ 1782227230914510848
author Fischer, Elvira
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Logothetis, Nikos K.
Bartels, Andreas
author_facet Fischer, Elvira
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Logothetis, Nikos K.
Bartels, Andreas
author_sort Fischer, Elvira
collection PubMed
description Motion processing regions apart from V5+/MT+ are still relatively poorly understood. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to perform a detailed functional analysis of the recently described cingulate sulcus visual area (CSv) in the dorsal posterior cingulate cortex. We used distinct types of visual motion stimuli to compare CSv with V5/MT and MST, including a visual pursuit paradigm. Both V5/MT and MST preferred 3D flow over 2D planar motion, responded less yet substantially to random motion, had a strong preference for contralateral versus ipsilateral stimulation, and responded nearly equally to contralateral and to full-field stimuli. In contrast, CSv had a pronounced preference to 2D planar motion over 3D flow, did not respond to random motion, had a weak and nonsignificant lateralization that was significantly smaller than that of MST, and strongly preferred full-field over contralateral stimuli. In addition, CSv had a better capability to integrate eye movements with retinal motion compared with V5/MT and MST. CSv thus differs from V5+/MT+ by its unique preference to full-field, coherent, and planar motion cues. These results place CSv in a good position to process visual cues related to self-induced motion, in particular those associated to eye or lateral head movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3306574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33065742012-03-19 Visual Motion Responses in the Posterior Cingulate Sulcus: A Comparison to V5/MT and MST Fischer, Elvira Bülthoff, Heinrich H. Logothetis, Nikos K. Bartels, Andreas Cereb Cortex Articles Motion processing regions apart from V5+/MT+ are still relatively poorly understood. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to perform a detailed functional analysis of the recently described cingulate sulcus visual area (CSv) in the dorsal posterior cingulate cortex. We used distinct types of visual motion stimuli to compare CSv with V5/MT and MST, including a visual pursuit paradigm. Both V5/MT and MST preferred 3D flow over 2D planar motion, responded less yet substantially to random motion, had a strong preference for contralateral versus ipsilateral stimulation, and responded nearly equally to contralateral and to full-field stimuli. In contrast, CSv had a pronounced preference to 2D planar motion over 3D flow, did not respond to random motion, had a weak and nonsignificant lateralization that was significantly smaller than that of MST, and strongly preferred full-field over contralateral stimuli. In addition, CSv had a better capability to integrate eye movements with retinal motion compared with V5/MT and MST. CSv thus differs from V5+/MT+ by its unique preference to full-field, coherent, and planar motion cues. These results place CSv in a good position to process visual cues related to self-induced motion, in particular those associated to eye or lateral head movements. Oxford University Press 2012-04 2011-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3306574/ /pubmed/21709176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr154 Text en © The Authors 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Fischer, Elvira
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Logothetis, Nikos K.
Bartels, Andreas
Visual Motion Responses in the Posterior Cingulate Sulcus: A Comparison to V5/MT and MST
title Visual Motion Responses in the Posterior Cingulate Sulcus: A Comparison to V5/MT and MST
title_full Visual Motion Responses in the Posterior Cingulate Sulcus: A Comparison to V5/MT and MST
title_fullStr Visual Motion Responses in the Posterior Cingulate Sulcus: A Comparison to V5/MT and MST
title_full_unstemmed Visual Motion Responses in the Posterior Cingulate Sulcus: A Comparison to V5/MT and MST
title_short Visual Motion Responses in the Posterior Cingulate Sulcus: A Comparison to V5/MT and MST
title_sort visual motion responses in the posterior cingulate sulcus: a comparison to v5/mt and mst
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21709176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr154
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerelvira visualmotionresponsesintheposteriorcingulatesulcusacomparisontov5mtandmst
AT bulthoffheinrichh visualmotionresponsesintheposteriorcingulatesulcusacomparisontov5mtandmst
AT logothetisnikosk visualmotionresponsesintheposteriorcingulatesulcusacomparisontov5mtandmst
AT bartelsandreas visualmotionresponsesintheposteriorcingulatesulcusacomparisontov5mtandmst