Cargando…
Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus
Medulloblastoma, a small blue cell malignancy of the cerebellum, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric oncology. Current mechanisms for clinical prognostication and stratification include clinical factors (age, presence of metastases, and extent of resection) as well as histologic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22134537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z |
_version_ | 1782227241387687936 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Michael D. Northcott, Paul A. Korshunov, Andrey Remke, Marc Cho, Yoon-Jae Clifford, Steven C. Eberhart, Charles G. Parsons, D. Williams Rutkowski, Stefan Gajjar, Amar Ellison, David W. Lichter, Peter Gilbertson, Richard J. Pomeroy, Scott L. Kool, Marcel Pfister, Stefan M. |
author_facet | Taylor, Michael D. Northcott, Paul A. Korshunov, Andrey Remke, Marc Cho, Yoon-Jae Clifford, Steven C. Eberhart, Charles G. Parsons, D. Williams Rutkowski, Stefan Gajjar, Amar Ellison, David W. Lichter, Peter Gilbertson, Richard J. Pomeroy, Scott L. Kool, Marcel Pfister, Stefan M. |
author_sort | Taylor, Michael D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Medulloblastoma, a small blue cell malignancy of the cerebellum, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric oncology. Current mechanisms for clinical prognostication and stratification include clinical factors (age, presence of metastases, and extent of resection) as well as histological subgrouping (classic, desmoplastic, and large cell/anaplastic histology). Transcriptional profiling studies of medulloblastoma cohorts from several research groups around the globe have suggested the existence of multiple distinct molecular subgroups that differ in their demographics, transcriptomes, somatic genetic events, and clinical outcomes. Variations in the number, composition, and nature of the subgroups between studies brought about a consensus conference in Boston in the fall of 2010. Discussants at the conference came to a consensus that the evidence supported the existence of four main subgroups of medulloblastoma (Wnt, Shh, Group 3, and Group 4). Participants outlined the demographic, transcriptional, genetic, and clinical differences between the four subgroups. While it is anticipated that the molecular classification of medulloblastoma will continue to evolve and diversify in the future as larger cohorts are studied at greater depth, herein we outline the current consensus nomenclature, and the differences between the medulloblastoma subgroups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3306779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33067792012-03-22 Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus Taylor, Michael D. Northcott, Paul A. Korshunov, Andrey Remke, Marc Cho, Yoon-Jae Clifford, Steven C. Eberhart, Charles G. Parsons, D. Williams Rutkowski, Stefan Gajjar, Amar Ellison, David W. Lichter, Peter Gilbertson, Richard J. Pomeroy, Scott L. Kool, Marcel Pfister, Stefan M. Acta Neuropathol Consensus Paper Medulloblastoma, a small blue cell malignancy of the cerebellum, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric oncology. Current mechanisms for clinical prognostication and stratification include clinical factors (age, presence of metastases, and extent of resection) as well as histological subgrouping (classic, desmoplastic, and large cell/anaplastic histology). Transcriptional profiling studies of medulloblastoma cohorts from several research groups around the globe have suggested the existence of multiple distinct molecular subgroups that differ in their demographics, transcriptomes, somatic genetic events, and clinical outcomes. Variations in the number, composition, and nature of the subgroups between studies brought about a consensus conference in Boston in the fall of 2010. Discussants at the conference came to a consensus that the evidence supported the existence of four main subgroups of medulloblastoma (Wnt, Shh, Group 3, and Group 4). Participants outlined the demographic, transcriptional, genetic, and clinical differences between the four subgroups. While it is anticipated that the molecular classification of medulloblastoma will continue to evolve and diversify in the future as larger cohorts are studied at greater depth, herein we outline the current consensus nomenclature, and the differences between the medulloblastoma subgroups. Springer-Verlag 2011-12-02 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3306779/ /pubmed/22134537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Consensus Paper Taylor, Michael D. Northcott, Paul A. Korshunov, Andrey Remke, Marc Cho, Yoon-Jae Clifford, Steven C. Eberhart, Charles G. Parsons, D. Williams Rutkowski, Stefan Gajjar, Amar Ellison, David W. Lichter, Peter Gilbertson, Richard J. Pomeroy, Scott L. Kool, Marcel Pfister, Stefan M. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus |
title | Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus |
title_full | Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus |
title_fullStr | Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus |
title_short | Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus |
title_sort | molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus |
topic | Consensus Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22134537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylormichaeld molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT northcottpaula molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT korshunovandrey molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT remkemarc molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT choyoonjae molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT cliffordstevenc molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT eberhartcharlesg molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT parsonsdwilliams molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT rutkowskistefan molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT gajjaramar molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT ellisondavidw molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT lichterpeter molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT gilbertsonrichardj molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT pomeroyscottl molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT koolmarcel molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus AT pfisterstefanm molecularsubgroupsofmedulloblastomathecurrentconsensus |