Cargando…

Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients with severely elevated LDL-C do not achieve recommended treatment targets, despite treatment with statins. Adults at high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C ≥ 2.59 and ≤ 4.14 mmol/L (N = 250), pretreated with atorvastatin 20 mg were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hing Ling, Paul Kah, Civeira, Fernando, Dan, Andrei Gheorghe, Hanson, Mary E, Massaad, Rachid, De Tilleghem, Celine Le Bailly, Milardo, Christopher, Triscari, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22293030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-11-18
_version_ 1782227246617985024
author Hing Ling, Paul Kah
Civeira, Fernando
Dan, Andrei Gheorghe
Hanson, Mary E
Massaad, Rachid
De Tilleghem, Celine Le Bailly
Milardo, Christopher
Triscari, Joseph
author_facet Hing Ling, Paul Kah
Civeira, Fernando
Dan, Andrei Gheorghe
Hanson, Mary E
Massaad, Rachid
De Tilleghem, Celine Le Bailly
Milardo, Christopher
Triscari, Joseph
author_sort Hing Ling, Paul Kah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients with severely elevated LDL-C do not achieve recommended treatment targets, despite treatment with statins. Adults at high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C ≥ 2.59 and ≤ 4.14 mmol/L (N = 250), pretreated with atorvastatin 20 mg were randomized to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg for 6 weeks. The percent change in LDL-C and other lipids was assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis method with terms for treatment, time, time-by-treatment interaction, stratum, and time-by-stratum interaction. Percentage of subjects achieving LDL-C < 1.81 mmol/L, < 2.00 mmol/L, or < 2.59 mmol/L was assessed using a logistic regression model with terms for treatment and stratum. Tolerability was assessed. RESULTS: Switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin resulted in significantly greater changes in LDL-C (-26.81% vs.-11.81%), total cholesterol (-15.97% vs.-7.73%), non-HDL-C (-22.50% vs.-10.88%), Apo B (-17.23% vs.-9.53%), and Apo A-I (2.56% vs.-2.69%) vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (all p ≤ 0.002), but not HDL-C, triglycerides, or hs-CRP. Significantly more subjects achieved LDL-C < 1.81 mmol/L (29% vs. 5%), < 2.00 mmol/L (38% vs. 9%) or < 2.59 mmol/L (69% vs. 41%) after switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (all p < 0.001). The overall safety profile appeared generally comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In high cardiovascular risk subjects with hypercholesterolemia already treated with atorvastatin 20 mg but not at LDL-C < 2.59 mmol/L, switching to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg provided significantly greater LDL-C lowering and greater achievement of LDL-C targets compared with doubling the atorvastatin dose to 40 mg. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00782184
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3306831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33068312012-03-19 Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study Hing Ling, Paul Kah Civeira, Fernando Dan, Andrei Gheorghe Hanson, Mary E Massaad, Rachid De Tilleghem, Celine Le Bailly Milardo, Christopher Triscari, Joseph Lipids Health Dis Research BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients with severely elevated LDL-C do not achieve recommended treatment targets, despite treatment with statins. Adults at high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C ≥ 2.59 and ≤ 4.14 mmol/L (N = 250), pretreated with atorvastatin 20 mg were randomized to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg for 6 weeks. The percent change in LDL-C and other lipids was assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis method with terms for treatment, time, time-by-treatment interaction, stratum, and time-by-stratum interaction. Percentage of subjects achieving LDL-C < 1.81 mmol/L, < 2.00 mmol/L, or < 2.59 mmol/L was assessed using a logistic regression model with terms for treatment and stratum. Tolerability was assessed. RESULTS: Switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin resulted in significantly greater changes in LDL-C (-26.81% vs.-11.81%), total cholesterol (-15.97% vs.-7.73%), non-HDL-C (-22.50% vs.-10.88%), Apo B (-17.23% vs.-9.53%), and Apo A-I (2.56% vs.-2.69%) vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (all p ≤ 0.002), but not HDL-C, triglycerides, or hs-CRP. Significantly more subjects achieved LDL-C < 1.81 mmol/L (29% vs. 5%), < 2.00 mmol/L (38% vs. 9%) or < 2.59 mmol/L (69% vs. 41%) after switching to ezetimibe/simvastatin vs. doubling the atorvastatin dose (all p < 0.001). The overall safety profile appeared generally comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In high cardiovascular risk subjects with hypercholesterolemia already treated with atorvastatin 20 mg but not at LDL-C < 2.59 mmol/L, switching to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg provided significantly greater LDL-C lowering and greater achievement of LDL-C targets compared with doubling the atorvastatin dose to 40 mg. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00782184 BioMed Central 2012-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3306831/ /pubmed/22293030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-11-18 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ling et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hing Ling, Paul Kah
Civeira, Fernando
Dan, Andrei Gheorghe
Hanson, Mary E
Massaad, Rachid
De Tilleghem, Celine Le Bailly
Milardo, Christopher
Triscari, Joseph
Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study
title Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study
title_full Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study
title_fullStr Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study
title_short Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study
title_sort ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg versus atorvastatin 40 mg in high cardiovascular risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22293030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-11-18
work_keys_str_mv AT hinglingpaulkah ezetimibesimvastatin1040mgversusatorvastatin40mginhighcardiovascularriskpatientswithprimaryhypercholesterolemiaarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT civeirafernando ezetimibesimvastatin1040mgversusatorvastatin40mginhighcardiovascularriskpatientswithprimaryhypercholesterolemiaarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT danandreigheorghe ezetimibesimvastatin1040mgversusatorvastatin40mginhighcardiovascularriskpatientswithprimaryhypercholesterolemiaarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT hansonmarye ezetimibesimvastatin1040mgversusatorvastatin40mginhighcardiovascularriskpatientswithprimaryhypercholesterolemiaarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT massaadrachid ezetimibesimvastatin1040mgversusatorvastatin40mginhighcardiovascularriskpatientswithprimaryhypercholesterolemiaarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT detilleghemcelinelebailly ezetimibesimvastatin1040mgversusatorvastatin40mginhighcardiovascularriskpatientswithprimaryhypercholesterolemiaarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT milardochristopher ezetimibesimvastatin1040mgversusatorvastatin40mginhighcardiovascularriskpatientswithprimaryhypercholesterolemiaarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolledmulticenterstudy
AT triscarijoseph ezetimibesimvastatin1040mgversusatorvastatin40mginhighcardiovascularriskpatientswithprimaryhypercholesterolemiaarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolledmulticenterstudy