Cargando…
Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study
OBJECTIVES: The GIOVE Study was aimed to the achievement of allocative efficiency of the budget allocated to the prevention of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced diseases. An ex-ante determination of the most efficient allocation of resources between screening and multicohort quadrivalent immunisati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000736 |
_version_ | 1782227279931244544 |
---|---|
author | Mennini, Francesco Saverio Baio, Gianluca Montagano, Giuseppe Cauzillo, Gabriella Locuratolo, Francesco Becce, Gerardo Gitto, Lara Marcellusi, Andrea Zweifel, Peter Capone, Alessandro Favato, Giampiero |
author_facet | Mennini, Francesco Saverio Baio, Gianluca Montagano, Giuseppe Cauzillo, Gabriella Locuratolo, Francesco Becce, Gerardo Gitto, Lara Marcellusi, Andrea Zweifel, Peter Capone, Alessandro Favato, Giampiero |
author_sort | Mennini, Francesco Saverio |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The GIOVE Study was aimed to the achievement of allocative efficiency of the budget allocated to the prevention of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced diseases. An ex-ante determination of the most efficient allocation of resources between screening and multicohort quadrivalent immunisation programmes was followed by the ex-post assessment of the allocative efficiency actually achieved after a 12-month period. DESIGN: A bound optimisation model was developed to determine the ex-ante allocative efficiency of resources. The alternatives compared were the screening programme alone and the quadrivalent immunisation with access to screening. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the uncertainty associated with the main inputs of the model. Subsequently, a cohort of girls with a complete recorded vaccination history were enrolled in an observational retrospective study for 18 months to ensure full compliance with the recommended schedule of vaccination (0, 2, 6 months) within a 12-month time horizon. SETTING: Basilicata region, in the south of Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 12 848 girls aged 12, 15, 18 or 25 years. INTERVENTION: Immunisation with quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccine. OUTCOME MEASURES: The vaccination coverage rate was considered to be the indicator of the best achievable benefit, given the budgetary constraints. RESULTS: Assuming a vaccine price of €100 per dose, a vaccination coverage rate of 59.6% was required for the most effective allocation of resources. The optimal rate of coverage was initially in favour of the multicohort strategy of vaccination against HPV (72.8%±2%). When the price paid for the quadrivalent vaccine dropped to €85 per dose, the most efficient coverage rate (69.5%) shifted closer to the immunisation rate actually achieved during the 12-month observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The bound optimisation model demonstrated to be a useful approach to the ex-ante allocation and the ex-post assessment of the resources allocated to the implementation of a multicohort quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccination programme. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3307037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33070372012-03-21 Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study Mennini, Francesco Saverio Baio, Gianluca Montagano, Giuseppe Cauzillo, Gabriella Locuratolo, Francesco Becce, Gerardo Gitto, Lara Marcellusi, Andrea Zweifel, Peter Capone, Alessandro Favato, Giampiero BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: The GIOVE Study was aimed to the achievement of allocative efficiency of the budget allocated to the prevention of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced diseases. An ex-ante determination of the most efficient allocation of resources between screening and multicohort quadrivalent immunisation programmes was followed by the ex-post assessment of the allocative efficiency actually achieved after a 12-month period. DESIGN: A bound optimisation model was developed to determine the ex-ante allocative efficiency of resources. The alternatives compared were the screening programme alone and the quadrivalent immunisation with access to screening. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the uncertainty associated with the main inputs of the model. Subsequently, a cohort of girls with a complete recorded vaccination history were enrolled in an observational retrospective study for 18 months to ensure full compliance with the recommended schedule of vaccination (0, 2, 6 months) within a 12-month time horizon. SETTING: Basilicata region, in the south of Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 12 848 girls aged 12, 15, 18 or 25 years. INTERVENTION: Immunisation with quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccine. OUTCOME MEASURES: The vaccination coverage rate was considered to be the indicator of the best achievable benefit, given the budgetary constraints. RESULTS: Assuming a vaccine price of €100 per dose, a vaccination coverage rate of 59.6% was required for the most effective allocation of resources. The optimal rate of coverage was initially in favour of the multicohort strategy of vaccination against HPV (72.8%±2%). When the price paid for the quadrivalent vaccine dropped to €85 per dose, the most efficient coverage rate (69.5%) shifted closer to the immunisation rate actually achieved during the 12-month observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The bound optimisation model demonstrated to be a useful approach to the ex-ante allocation and the ex-post assessment of the resources allocated to the implementation of a multicohort quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccination programme. BMJ Group 2012-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3307037/ /pubmed/22422918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000736 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Mennini, Francesco Saverio Baio, Gianluca Montagano, Giuseppe Cauzillo, Gabriella Locuratolo, Francesco Becce, Gerardo Gitto, Lara Marcellusi, Andrea Zweifel, Peter Capone, Alessandro Favato, Giampiero Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study |
title | Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study |
title_full | Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study |
title_fullStr | Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study |
title_short | Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study |
title_sort | governance of preventive health intervention and on time verification of its efficiency: the giove study |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menninifrancescosaverio governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT baiogianluca governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT montaganogiuseppe governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT cauzillogabriella governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT locuratolofrancesco governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT beccegerardo governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT gittolara governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT marcellusiandrea governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT zweifelpeter governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT caponealessandro governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy AT favatogiampiero governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy |