Cargando…

Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study

OBJECTIVES: The GIOVE Study was aimed to the achievement of allocative efficiency of the budget allocated to the prevention of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced diseases. An ex-ante determination of the most efficient allocation of resources between screening and multicohort quadrivalent immunisati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mennini, Francesco Saverio, Baio, Gianluca, Montagano, Giuseppe, Cauzillo, Gabriella, Locuratolo, Francesco, Becce, Gerardo, Gitto, Lara, Marcellusi, Andrea, Zweifel, Peter, Capone, Alessandro, Favato, Giampiero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000736
_version_ 1782227279931244544
author Mennini, Francesco Saverio
Baio, Gianluca
Montagano, Giuseppe
Cauzillo, Gabriella
Locuratolo, Francesco
Becce, Gerardo
Gitto, Lara
Marcellusi, Andrea
Zweifel, Peter
Capone, Alessandro
Favato, Giampiero
author_facet Mennini, Francesco Saverio
Baio, Gianluca
Montagano, Giuseppe
Cauzillo, Gabriella
Locuratolo, Francesco
Becce, Gerardo
Gitto, Lara
Marcellusi, Andrea
Zweifel, Peter
Capone, Alessandro
Favato, Giampiero
author_sort Mennini, Francesco Saverio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The GIOVE Study was aimed to the achievement of allocative efficiency of the budget allocated to the prevention of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced diseases. An ex-ante determination of the most efficient allocation of resources between screening and multicohort quadrivalent immunisation programmes was followed by the ex-post assessment of the allocative efficiency actually achieved after a 12-month period. DESIGN: A bound optimisation model was developed to determine the ex-ante allocative efficiency of resources. The alternatives compared were the screening programme alone and the quadrivalent immunisation with access to screening. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the uncertainty associated with the main inputs of the model. Subsequently, a cohort of girls with a complete recorded vaccination history were enrolled in an observational retrospective study for 18 months to ensure full compliance with the recommended schedule of vaccination (0, 2, 6 months) within a 12-month time horizon. SETTING: Basilicata region, in the south of Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 12 848 girls aged 12, 15, 18 or 25 years. INTERVENTION: Immunisation with quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccine. OUTCOME MEASURES: The vaccination coverage rate was considered to be the indicator of the best achievable benefit, given the budgetary constraints. RESULTS: Assuming a vaccine price of €100 per dose, a vaccination coverage rate of 59.6% was required for the most effective allocation of resources. The optimal rate of coverage was initially in favour of the multicohort strategy of vaccination against HPV (72.8%±2%). When the price paid for the quadrivalent vaccine dropped to €85 per dose, the most efficient coverage rate (69.5%) shifted closer to the immunisation rate actually achieved during the 12-month observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The bound optimisation model demonstrated to be a useful approach to the ex-ante allocation and the ex-post assessment of the resources allocated to the implementation of a multicohort quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccination programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3307037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33070372012-03-21 Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study Mennini, Francesco Saverio Baio, Gianluca Montagano, Giuseppe Cauzillo, Gabriella Locuratolo, Francesco Becce, Gerardo Gitto, Lara Marcellusi, Andrea Zweifel, Peter Capone, Alessandro Favato, Giampiero BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: The GIOVE Study was aimed to the achievement of allocative efficiency of the budget allocated to the prevention of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced diseases. An ex-ante determination of the most efficient allocation of resources between screening and multicohort quadrivalent immunisation programmes was followed by the ex-post assessment of the allocative efficiency actually achieved after a 12-month period. DESIGN: A bound optimisation model was developed to determine the ex-ante allocative efficiency of resources. The alternatives compared were the screening programme alone and the quadrivalent immunisation with access to screening. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the uncertainty associated with the main inputs of the model. Subsequently, a cohort of girls with a complete recorded vaccination history were enrolled in an observational retrospective study for 18 months to ensure full compliance with the recommended schedule of vaccination (0, 2, 6 months) within a 12-month time horizon. SETTING: Basilicata region, in the south of Italy. PARTICIPANTS: 12 848 girls aged 12, 15, 18 or 25 years. INTERVENTION: Immunisation with quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccine. OUTCOME MEASURES: The vaccination coverage rate was considered to be the indicator of the best achievable benefit, given the budgetary constraints. RESULTS: Assuming a vaccine price of €100 per dose, a vaccination coverage rate of 59.6% was required for the most effective allocation of resources. The optimal rate of coverage was initially in favour of the multicohort strategy of vaccination against HPV (72.8%±2%). When the price paid for the quadrivalent vaccine dropped to €85 per dose, the most efficient coverage rate (69.5%) shifted closer to the immunisation rate actually achieved during the 12-month observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The bound optimisation model demonstrated to be a useful approach to the ex-ante allocation and the ex-post assessment of the resources allocated to the implementation of a multicohort quadrivalent anti-HPV vaccination programme. BMJ Group 2012-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3307037/ /pubmed/22422918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000736 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Mennini, Francesco Saverio
Baio, Gianluca
Montagano, Giuseppe
Cauzillo, Gabriella
Locuratolo, Francesco
Becce, Gerardo
Gitto, Lara
Marcellusi, Andrea
Zweifel, Peter
Capone, Alessandro
Favato, Giampiero
Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study
title Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study
title_full Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study
title_fullStr Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study
title_full_unstemmed Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study
title_short Governance of preventive Health Intervention and On time Verification of its Efficiency: the GIOVE Study
title_sort governance of preventive health intervention and on time verification of its efficiency: the giove study
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22422918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000736
work_keys_str_mv AT menninifrancescosaverio governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT baiogianluca governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT montaganogiuseppe governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT cauzillogabriella governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT locuratolofrancesco governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT beccegerardo governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT gittolara governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT marcellusiandrea governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT zweifelpeter governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT caponealessandro governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy
AT favatogiampiero governanceofpreventivehealthinterventionandontimeverificationofitsefficiencythegiovestudy