Cargando…

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic investigation plus meta-analysis into survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers and to compare the results with those from the 2005 ART meta-analysis. Until February 2010, four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Amorim, Rodrigo G., Leal, Soraya C., Frencken, Jo E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21274581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0513-3
_version_ 1782227377724588032
author de Amorim, Rodrigo G.
Leal, Soraya C.
Frencken, Jo E.
author_facet de Amorim, Rodrigo G.
Leal, Soraya C.
Frencken, Jo E.
author_sort de Amorim, Rodrigo G.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic investigation plus meta-analysis into survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers and to compare the results with those from the 2005 ART meta-analysis. Until February 2010, four databases were searched. Two hundred four publications were found, and 66 reported on ART restorations or sealant survival. Based on five exclusion criteria, two independent reviewers selected the 29 publications that accounted for the meta-analysis. Confidence intervals (CI) and or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. Location (school/clinic) was an independent variable. The survival rates of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary teeth over the first 2 years were 93% (CI, 91–94%) and 62% (CI, 51–73%), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over the first 3 and 5 years it was 85% (CI, 77–91%) and 80% (CI, 76–83%), respectively and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over 1 year it was 86% (CI, 59–98%). The mean annual dentine lesion incidence rate, in pits and fissures previously sealed using ART, over the first 3 years was 1%. No location effect and no differences between the 2005 and 2010 survival rates of ART restorations and sealants were observed. The short-term survival rates of single-surface ART restorations in primary and permanent teeth, and the caries-preventive effect of ART sealants were high. Clinical relevance: ART can safely be used in single-surface cavities in both primary and permanent teeth. ART sealants have a high caries preventive effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3308010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33080102012-03-22 Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis de Amorim, Rodrigo G. Leal, Soraya C. Frencken, Jo E. Clin Oral Investig Original Article The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic investigation plus meta-analysis into survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers and to compare the results with those from the 2005 ART meta-analysis. Until February 2010, four databases were searched. Two hundred four publications were found, and 66 reported on ART restorations or sealant survival. Based on five exclusion criteria, two independent reviewers selected the 29 publications that accounted for the meta-analysis. Confidence intervals (CI) and or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. Location (school/clinic) was an independent variable. The survival rates of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary teeth over the first 2 years were 93% (CI, 91–94%) and 62% (CI, 51–73%), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over the first 3 and 5 years it was 85% (CI, 77–91%) and 80% (CI, 76–83%), respectively and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over 1 year it was 86% (CI, 59–98%). The mean annual dentine lesion incidence rate, in pits and fissures previously sealed using ART, over the first 3 years was 1%. No location effect and no differences between the 2005 and 2010 survival rates of ART restorations and sealants were observed. The short-term survival rates of single-surface ART restorations in primary and permanent teeth, and the caries-preventive effect of ART sealants were high. Clinical relevance: ART can safely be used in single-surface cavities in both primary and permanent teeth. ART sealants have a high caries preventive effect. Springer-Verlag 2011-01-28 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3308010/ /pubmed/21274581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0513-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Amorim, Rodrigo G.
Leal, Soraya C.
Frencken, Jo E.
Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis
title Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis
title_full Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis
title_short Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis
title_sort survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (art) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21274581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0513-3
work_keys_str_mv AT deamorimrodrigog survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentartsealantsandrestorationsametaanalysis
AT lealsorayac survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentartsealantsandrestorationsametaanalysis
AT frenckenjoe survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentartsealantsandrestorationsametaanalysis