Cargando…

A comparative analysis of exome capture

BACKGROUND: Human exome resequencing using commercial target capture kits has been and is being used for sequencing large numbers of individuals to search for variants associated with various human diseases. We rigorously evaluated the capabilities of two solution exome capture kits. These analyses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parla, Jennifer S, Iossifov, Ivan, Grabill, Ian, Spector, Mona S, Kramer, Melissa, McCombie, W Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21958622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r97
_version_ 1782227387577008128
author Parla, Jennifer S
Iossifov, Ivan
Grabill, Ian
Spector, Mona S
Kramer, Melissa
McCombie, W Richard
author_facet Parla, Jennifer S
Iossifov, Ivan
Grabill, Ian
Spector, Mona S
Kramer, Melissa
McCombie, W Richard
author_sort Parla, Jennifer S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human exome resequencing using commercial target capture kits has been and is being used for sequencing large numbers of individuals to search for variants associated with various human diseases. We rigorously evaluated the capabilities of two solution exome capture kits. These analyses help clarify the strengths and limitations of those data as well as systematically identify variables that should be considered in the use of those data. RESULTS: Each exome kit performed well at capturing the targets they were designed to capture, which mainly corresponds to the consensus coding sequences (CCDS) annotations of the human genome. In addition, based on their respective targets, each capture kit coupled with high coverage Illumina sequencing produced highly accurate nucleotide calls. However, other databases, such as the Reference Sequence collection (RefSeq), define the exome more broadly, and so not surprisingly, the exome kits did not capture these additional regions. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial exome capture kits provide a very efficient way to sequence select areas of the genome at very high accuracy. Here we provide the data to help guide critical analyses of sequencing data derived from these products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3308060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33080602012-03-20 A comparative analysis of exome capture Parla, Jennifer S Iossifov, Ivan Grabill, Ian Spector, Mona S Kramer, Melissa McCombie, W Richard Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Human exome resequencing using commercial target capture kits has been and is being used for sequencing large numbers of individuals to search for variants associated with various human diseases. We rigorously evaluated the capabilities of two solution exome capture kits. These analyses help clarify the strengths and limitations of those data as well as systematically identify variables that should be considered in the use of those data. RESULTS: Each exome kit performed well at capturing the targets they were designed to capture, which mainly corresponds to the consensus coding sequences (CCDS) annotations of the human genome. In addition, based on their respective targets, each capture kit coupled with high coverage Illumina sequencing produced highly accurate nucleotide calls. However, other databases, such as the Reference Sequence collection (RefSeq), define the exome more broadly, and so not surprisingly, the exome kits did not capture these additional regions. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial exome capture kits provide a very efficient way to sequence select areas of the genome at very high accuracy. Here we provide the data to help guide critical analyses of sequencing data derived from these products. BioMed Central 2011 2011-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3308060/ /pubmed/21958622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r97 Text en Copyright ©2011 Parla et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Parla, Jennifer S
Iossifov, Ivan
Grabill, Ian
Spector, Mona S
Kramer, Melissa
McCombie, W Richard
A comparative analysis of exome capture
title A comparative analysis of exome capture
title_full A comparative analysis of exome capture
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of exome capture
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of exome capture
title_short A comparative analysis of exome capture
title_sort comparative analysis of exome capture
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21958622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r97
work_keys_str_mv AT parlajennifers acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT iossifovivan acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT grabillian acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT spectormonas acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT kramermelissa acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT mccombiewrichard acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT parlajennifers comparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT iossifovivan comparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT grabillian comparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT spectormonas comparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT kramermelissa comparativeanalysisofexomecapture
AT mccombiewrichard comparativeanalysisofexomecapture