Cargando…
A comparative analysis of exome capture
BACKGROUND: Human exome resequencing using commercial target capture kits has been and is being used for sequencing large numbers of individuals to search for variants associated with various human diseases. We rigorously evaluated the capabilities of two solution exome capture kits. These analyses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21958622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r97 |
_version_ | 1782227387577008128 |
---|---|
author | Parla, Jennifer S Iossifov, Ivan Grabill, Ian Spector, Mona S Kramer, Melissa McCombie, W Richard |
author_facet | Parla, Jennifer S Iossifov, Ivan Grabill, Ian Spector, Mona S Kramer, Melissa McCombie, W Richard |
author_sort | Parla, Jennifer S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Human exome resequencing using commercial target capture kits has been and is being used for sequencing large numbers of individuals to search for variants associated with various human diseases. We rigorously evaluated the capabilities of two solution exome capture kits. These analyses help clarify the strengths and limitations of those data as well as systematically identify variables that should be considered in the use of those data. RESULTS: Each exome kit performed well at capturing the targets they were designed to capture, which mainly corresponds to the consensus coding sequences (CCDS) annotations of the human genome. In addition, based on their respective targets, each capture kit coupled with high coverage Illumina sequencing produced highly accurate nucleotide calls. However, other databases, such as the Reference Sequence collection (RefSeq), define the exome more broadly, and so not surprisingly, the exome kits did not capture these additional regions. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial exome capture kits provide a very efficient way to sequence select areas of the genome at very high accuracy. Here we provide the data to help guide critical analyses of sequencing data derived from these products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3308060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33080602012-03-20 A comparative analysis of exome capture Parla, Jennifer S Iossifov, Ivan Grabill, Ian Spector, Mona S Kramer, Melissa McCombie, W Richard Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Human exome resequencing using commercial target capture kits has been and is being used for sequencing large numbers of individuals to search for variants associated with various human diseases. We rigorously evaluated the capabilities of two solution exome capture kits. These analyses help clarify the strengths and limitations of those data as well as systematically identify variables that should be considered in the use of those data. RESULTS: Each exome kit performed well at capturing the targets they were designed to capture, which mainly corresponds to the consensus coding sequences (CCDS) annotations of the human genome. In addition, based on their respective targets, each capture kit coupled with high coverage Illumina sequencing produced highly accurate nucleotide calls. However, other databases, such as the Reference Sequence collection (RefSeq), define the exome more broadly, and so not surprisingly, the exome kits did not capture these additional regions. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial exome capture kits provide a very efficient way to sequence select areas of the genome at very high accuracy. Here we provide the data to help guide critical analyses of sequencing data derived from these products. BioMed Central 2011 2011-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3308060/ /pubmed/21958622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r97 Text en Copyright ©2011 Parla et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Parla, Jennifer S Iossifov, Ivan Grabill, Ian Spector, Mona S Kramer, Melissa McCombie, W Richard A comparative analysis of exome capture |
title | A comparative analysis of exome capture |
title_full | A comparative analysis of exome capture |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of exome capture |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of exome capture |
title_short | A comparative analysis of exome capture |
title_sort | comparative analysis of exome capture |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21958622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r97 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parlajennifers acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT iossifovivan acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT grabillian acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT spectormonas acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT kramermelissa acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT mccombiewrichard acomparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT parlajennifers comparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT iossifovivan comparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT grabillian comparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT spectormonas comparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT kramermelissa comparativeanalysisofexomecapture AT mccombiewrichard comparativeanalysisofexomecapture |