Cargando…

Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory

INTRODUCTION: The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) and the SF-36 PF-10, among other instruments, yield sensitive and valid Disability (Physical Function) endpoints. Modern techniques, such as Item Response Theory (IRT), now enable development of more precise instruments using i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fries, James F, Krishnan, Eswar, Rose, Matthias, Lingala, Bharathi, Bruce, Bonnie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21914216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3461
_version_ 1782227391071911936
author Fries, James F
Krishnan, Eswar
Rose, Matthias
Lingala, Bharathi
Bruce, Bonnie
author_facet Fries, James F
Krishnan, Eswar
Rose, Matthias
Lingala, Bharathi
Bruce, Bonnie
author_sort Fries, James F
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) and the SF-36 PF-10, among other instruments, yield sensitive and valid Disability (Physical Function) endpoints. Modern techniques, such as Item Response Theory (IRT), now enable development of more precise instruments using improved items. The NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is charged with developing improved IRT-based tools. We compared the ability to detect change in physical function using original (Legacy) instruments with Item-Improved and PROMIS IRT-based instruments. METHODS: We studied two Legacy (original) Physical Function/Disability instruments (HAQ, PF-10), their item-improved derivatives (Item-Improved HAQ and PF-10), and the IRT-based PROMIS Physical Function 10- (PROMIS PF 10) and 20-item (PROMIS PF 20) instruments. We compared sensitivity to detect 12-month changes in physical function in 451 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and assessed relative responsiveness using P-values, effect sizes (ES), and sample size requirements. RESULTS: The study sample was 81% female, 87% Caucasian, 65 years of age, had 14 years of education, and had moderate baseline disability. All instruments were sensitive to detecting change (< 0.05) in physical function over one year. The most responsive instruments in these patients were the Item-Improved HAQ and the PROMIS PF 20. IRT-improved instruments could detect a 1.2% difference with 80% power, while reference instruments could detect only a 2.3% difference (P < 0.01). The best IRT-based instruments required only one-quarter of the sample sizes of the Legacy (PF-10) comparator (95 versus 427). The HAQ outperformed the PF-10 in more impaired populations; the reverse was true in more normal populations. Considering especially the range of severity measured, the PROMIS PF 20 appears the most responsive instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Physical Function scales using item improved or IRT-based items can result in greater responsiveness and precision across a broader range of physical function. This can reduce sample size requirements and thus study costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3308075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33080752012-03-20 Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory Fries, James F Krishnan, Eswar Rose, Matthias Lingala, Bharathi Bruce, Bonnie Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) and the SF-36 PF-10, among other instruments, yield sensitive and valid Disability (Physical Function) endpoints. Modern techniques, such as Item Response Theory (IRT), now enable development of more precise instruments using improved items. The NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is charged with developing improved IRT-based tools. We compared the ability to detect change in physical function using original (Legacy) instruments with Item-Improved and PROMIS IRT-based instruments. METHODS: We studied two Legacy (original) Physical Function/Disability instruments (HAQ, PF-10), their item-improved derivatives (Item-Improved HAQ and PF-10), and the IRT-based PROMIS Physical Function 10- (PROMIS PF 10) and 20-item (PROMIS PF 20) instruments. We compared sensitivity to detect 12-month changes in physical function in 451 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and assessed relative responsiveness using P-values, effect sizes (ES), and sample size requirements. RESULTS: The study sample was 81% female, 87% Caucasian, 65 years of age, had 14 years of education, and had moderate baseline disability. All instruments were sensitive to detecting change (< 0.05) in physical function over one year. The most responsive instruments in these patients were the Item-Improved HAQ and the PROMIS PF 20. IRT-improved instruments could detect a 1.2% difference with 80% power, while reference instruments could detect only a 2.3% difference (P < 0.01). The best IRT-based instruments required only one-quarter of the sample sizes of the Legacy (PF-10) comparator (95 versus 427). The HAQ outperformed the PF-10 in more impaired populations; the reverse was true in more normal populations. Considering especially the range of severity measured, the PROMIS PF 20 appears the most responsive instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Physical Function scales using item improved or IRT-based items can result in greater responsiveness and precision across a broader range of physical function. This can reduce sample size requirements and thus study costs. BioMed Central 2011 2011-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3308075/ /pubmed/21914216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3461 Text en Copyright ©2011 Fries et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fries, James F
Krishnan, Eswar
Rose, Matthias
Lingala, Bharathi
Bruce, Bonnie
Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory
title Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory
title_full Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory
title_fullStr Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory
title_full_unstemmed Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory
title_short Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory
title_sort improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of promis physical function scales with item response theory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21914216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3461
work_keys_str_mv AT friesjamesf improvedresponsivenessandreducedsamplesizerequirementsofpromisphysicalfunctionscaleswithitemresponsetheory
AT krishnaneswar improvedresponsivenessandreducedsamplesizerequirementsofpromisphysicalfunctionscaleswithitemresponsetheory
AT rosematthias improvedresponsivenessandreducedsamplesizerequirementsofpromisphysicalfunctionscaleswithitemresponsetheory
AT lingalabharathi improvedresponsivenessandreducedsamplesizerequirementsofpromisphysicalfunctionscaleswithitemresponsetheory
AT brucebonnie improvedresponsivenessandreducedsamplesizerequirementsofpromisphysicalfunctionscaleswithitemresponsetheory