Cargando…

A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model

INTRODUCTION: While the importance and magnitude of the burden of low back pain upon the individual is well recognized, a systematic understanding of the impact of the condition on individuals is currently hampered by the lack of an organized understanding of what aspects of a person's life are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buchbinder, Rachelle, Batterham, Roy, Elsworth, Gerald, Dionne, Clermont E, Irvin, Emma, Osborne, Richard H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21933393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3468
_version_ 1782227392687767552
author Buchbinder, Rachelle
Batterham, Roy
Elsworth, Gerald
Dionne, Clermont E
Irvin, Emma
Osborne, Richard H
author_facet Buchbinder, Rachelle
Batterham, Roy
Elsworth, Gerald
Dionne, Clermont E
Irvin, Emma
Osborne, Richard H
author_sort Buchbinder, Rachelle
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While the importance and magnitude of the burden of low back pain upon the individual is well recognized, a systematic understanding of the impact of the condition on individuals is currently hampered by the lack of an organized understanding of what aspects of a person's life are affected and the lack of comprehensive measures for these effects. The aim of the present study was to develop a conceptual and measurement model of the overall burden of low back pain from the individual's perspective using a validity-driven approach. METHODS: To define the breadth of low back pain burden we conducted three concept-mapping workshops to generate an item pool. Two face-to-face workshops (Australia) were conducted with people with low back pain and clinicians and policy-makers, respectively. A third workshop (USA) was held with international multidisciplinary experts. Multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis, participant input and thematic analyses organized participants' ideas into clusters of ideas that then informed the conceptual model. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine statements were generated. Considerable overlap was observed between groups, and four major clusters were observed - Psychosocial, Physical, Treatment and Employment - each with between two and six subclusters. Content analysis revealed that elements of the Psychosocial cluster were sufficiently distinct to be split into Psychological and Social, and a further cluster of elements termed Positive Effects also emerged. Finally, a hypothesized structure was proposed with six domains and 16 subdomains. New domains not previously considered in the back pain field emerged for psychometric verification: loss of independence, worry about the future, and negative or discriminatory actions by others. CONCLUSIONS: Using a grounded approach, an explicit a priori and testable model of the overall burden of low back pain has been proposed that captures the full breadth of the burden experienced by patients and observed by experts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3308082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33080822012-03-20 A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model Buchbinder, Rachelle Batterham, Roy Elsworth, Gerald Dionne, Clermont E Irvin, Emma Osborne, Richard H Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: While the importance and magnitude of the burden of low back pain upon the individual is well recognized, a systematic understanding of the impact of the condition on individuals is currently hampered by the lack of an organized understanding of what aspects of a person's life are affected and the lack of comprehensive measures for these effects. The aim of the present study was to develop a conceptual and measurement model of the overall burden of low back pain from the individual's perspective using a validity-driven approach. METHODS: To define the breadth of low back pain burden we conducted three concept-mapping workshops to generate an item pool. Two face-to-face workshops (Australia) were conducted with people with low back pain and clinicians and policy-makers, respectively. A third workshop (USA) was held with international multidisciplinary experts. Multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis, participant input and thematic analyses organized participants' ideas into clusters of ideas that then informed the conceptual model. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine statements were generated. Considerable overlap was observed between groups, and four major clusters were observed - Psychosocial, Physical, Treatment and Employment - each with between two and six subclusters. Content analysis revealed that elements of the Psychosocial cluster were sufficiently distinct to be split into Psychological and Social, and a further cluster of elements termed Positive Effects also emerged. Finally, a hypothesized structure was proposed with six domains and 16 subdomains. New domains not previously considered in the back pain field emerged for psychometric verification: loss of independence, worry about the future, and negative or discriminatory actions by others. CONCLUSIONS: Using a grounded approach, an explicit a priori and testable model of the overall burden of low back pain has been proposed that captures the full breadth of the burden experienced by patients and observed by experts. BioMed Central 2011 2011-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3308082/ /pubmed/21933393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3468 Text en Copyright ©2011 Buchbinder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Batterham, Roy
Elsworth, Gerald
Dionne, Clermont E
Irvin, Emma
Osborne, Richard H
A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
title A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
title_full A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
title_fullStr A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
title_full_unstemmed A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
title_short A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
title_sort validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21933393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3468
work_keys_str_mv AT buchbinderrachelle avaliditydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT batterhamroy avaliditydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT elsworthgerald avaliditydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT dionneclermonte avaliditydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT irvinemma avaliditydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT osbornerichardh avaliditydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT buchbinderrachelle validitydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT batterhamroy validitydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT elsworthgerald validitydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT dionneclermonte validitydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT irvinemma validitydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel
AT osbornerichardh validitydrivenapproachtotheunderstandingofthepersonalandsocietalburdenoflowbackpaindevelopmentofaconceptualandmeasurementmodel