Cargando…

Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION: Administrative claims data have not commonly been used to study the clinical effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of the lack of a validated algorithm for this outcome. We created and tested a claims-based algorithm to serve as a proxy for the clinical eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curtis, Jeffrey R, Baddley, John W, Yang, Shuo, Patkar, Nivedita, Chen, Lang, Delzell, Elizabeth, Mikuls, Ted R, Saag, Kenneth G, Singh, Jasvinder, Safford, Monika, Cannon, Grant W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21933396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3471
_version_ 1782227393390313472
author Curtis, Jeffrey R
Baddley, John W
Yang, Shuo
Patkar, Nivedita
Chen, Lang
Delzell, Elizabeth
Mikuls, Ted R
Saag, Kenneth G
Singh, Jasvinder
Safford, Monika
Cannon, Grant W
author_facet Curtis, Jeffrey R
Baddley, John W
Yang, Shuo
Patkar, Nivedita
Chen, Lang
Delzell, Elizabeth
Mikuls, Ted R
Saag, Kenneth G
Singh, Jasvinder
Safford, Monika
Cannon, Grant W
author_sort Curtis, Jeffrey R
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Administrative claims data have not commonly been used to study the clinical effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of the lack of a validated algorithm for this outcome. We created and tested a claims-based algorithm to serve as a proxy for the clinical effectiveness of RA medications. METHODS: We linked Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical and pharmacy claims for RA patients participating in the longitudinal Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) RA registry (VARA). Among individuals for whom treatment with a new biologic agent or nonbiologic disease-modifying agent in rheumatic disease (DMARD) was being initiated and with registry follow-up at 1 year, VARA and administrative data were used to create a gold standard for the claims-based effectiveness algorithm. The gold standard outcome was low disease activity (LDA) (Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts (DAS28) ≤ 3.2) or improvement in DAS28 by > 1.2 units at 12 ± 2 months, with high adherence to therapy. The claims-based effectiveness algorithm incorporated biologic dose escalation or switching, addition of new disease-modifying agents, increase in oral glucocorticoid use and dose as well as parenteral glucocorticoid injections. RESULTS: Among 1,397 patients, we identified 305 eligible biologic or DMARD treatment episodes in 269 unique individuals. The patients were primarily men (94%) with a mean (± SD) age of 62 ± 10 years. At 1 year, 27% of treatment episodes achieved the effectiveness gold standard. The performance characteristics of the effectiveness algorithm were as follows: positive predictive value, 76% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 71% to 81%); negative predictive value, 90% (95% CI = 88% to 92%); sensitivity, 72% (95% CI = 67% to 77%); and specificity, 91% (95% CI = 89% to 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Administrative claims data may be useful in evaluating the effectiveness of medications for RA. Further validation of this effectiveness algorithm will be useful in assessing its generalizability and performance in other populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3308085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33080852012-03-20 Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis Curtis, Jeffrey R Baddley, John W Yang, Shuo Patkar, Nivedita Chen, Lang Delzell, Elizabeth Mikuls, Ted R Saag, Kenneth G Singh, Jasvinder Safford, Monika Cannon, Grant W Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: Administrative claims data have not commonly been used to study the clinical effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of the lack of a validated algorithm for this outcome. We created and tested a claims-based algorithm to serve as a proxy for the clinical effectiveness of RA medications. METHODS: We linked Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical and pharmacy claims for RA patients participating in the longitudinal Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) RA registry (VARA). Among individuals for whom treatment with a new biologic agent or nonbiologic disease-modifying agent in rheumatic disease (DMARD) was being initiated and with registry follow-up at 1 year, VARA and administrative data were used to create a gold standard for the claims-based effectiveness algorithm. The gold standard outcome was low disease activity (LDA) (Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts (DAS28) ≤ 3.2) or improvement in DAS28 by > 1.2 units at 12 ± 2 months, with high adherence to therapy. The claims-based effectiveness algorithm incorporated biologic dose escalation or switching, addition of new disease-modifying agents, increase in oral glucocorticoid use and dose as well as parenteral glucocorticoid injections. RESULTS: Among 1,397 patients, we identified 305 eligible biologic or DMARD treatment episodes in 269 unique individuals. The patients were primarily men (94%) with a mean (± SD) age of 62 ± 10 years. At 1 year, 27% of treatment episodes achieved the effectiveness gold standard. The performance characteristics of the effectiveness algorithm were as follows: positive predictive value, 76% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 71% to 81%); negative predictive value, 90% (95% CI = 88% to 92%); sensitivity, 72% (95% CI = 67% to 77%); and specificity, 91% (95% CI = 89% to 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Administrative claims data may be useful in evaluating the effectiveness of medications for RA. Further validation of this effectiveness algorithm will be useful in assessing its generalizability and performance in other populations. BioMed Central 2011 2011-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3308085/ /pubmed/21933396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3471 Text en Copyright ©2011 Curtis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Curtis, Jeffrey R
Baddley, John W
Yang, Shuo
Patkar, Nivedita
Chen, Lang
Delzell, Elizabeth
Mikuls, Ted R
Saag, Kenneth G
Singh, Jasvinder
Safford, Monika
Cannon, Grant W
Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis
title Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort derivation and preliminary validation of an administrative claims-based algorithm for the effectiveness of medications for rheumatoid arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21933396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3471
work_keys_str_mv AT curtisjeffreyr derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT baddleyjohnw derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT yangshuo derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT patkarnivedita derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT chenlang derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT delzellelizabeth derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT mikulstedr derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT saagkennethg derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT singhjasvinder derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT saffordmonika derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis
AT cannongrantw derivationandpreliminaryvalidationofanadministrativeclaimsbasedalgorithmfortheeffectivenessofmedicationsforrheumatoidarthritis