Cargando…

Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis

INTRODUCTION: Although osteoarthritis (OA) commonly involves multiple joints, no widely accepted method for quantifying whole-body OA burden exists. Therefore, our aim was to apply factor analytic methods to radiographic OA (rOA) grades across multiple joint sites, representing both presence and sev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, Amanda E, DeVellis, Robert F, Renner, Jordan B, Schwartz, Todd A, Conaghan, Philip G, Kraus, Virginia B, Jordan, Joanne M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22027269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3501
_version_ 1782227399473102848
author Nelson, Amanda E
DeVellis, Robert F
Renner, Jordan B
Schwartz, Todd A
Conaghan, Philip G
Kraus, Virginia B
Jordan, Joanne M
author_facet Nelson, Amanda E
DeVellis, Robert F
Renner, Jordan B
Schwartz, Todd A
Conaghan, Philip G
Kraus, Virginia B
Jordan, Joanne M
author_sort Nelson, Amanda E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although osteoarthritis (OA) commonly involves multiple joints, no widely accepted method for quantifying whole-body OA burden exists. Therefore, our aim was to apply factor analytic methods to radiographic OA (rOA) grades across multiple joint sites, representing both presence and severity, to quantify the burden of rOA. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. The sample (n = 2092) had a mean age of 65 ± 11 years, body mass index (BMI) 31 ± 7 kg/m(2), with 33% men and 34% African Americans. A single expert reader (intra-rater κ = 0.89) provided radiographic grades based on standard atlases for the hands (30 joints, including bilateral distal and proximal interphalangeal [IP], thumb IP, metacarpophalangeal [MCP] and carpometacarpal [CMC] joints), knees (patellofemoral and tibiofemoral, 4 joints), hips (2 joints), and spine (5 levels [L1/2 to L5/S1]). All grades were entered into an exploratory common factor analysis as continuous variables. Stratified factor analyses were used to look for differences by gender, race, age, and cohort subgroups. RESULTS: Four factors were identified as follows: IP/CMC factor (20 joints), MCP factor (8 joints), Knee factor (4 joints), Spine factor (5 levels). These factors had high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α range 0.80 to 0.95), were not collapsible into a single factor, and had moderate between-factor correlations (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.24 to 0.44). There were no major differences in factor structure when stratified by subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The 4 factors obtained in this analysis indicate that the variables contained within each factor share an underlying cause, but the 4 factors are distinct, suggesting that combining these joint sites into one overall measure is not appropriate. Using such factors to reflect multi-joint rOA in statistical models can reduce the number of variables needed and increase precision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3308111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33081112012-03-20 Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis Nelson, Amanda E DeVellis, Robert F Renner, Jordan B Schwartz, Todd A Conaghan, Philip G Kraus, Virginia B Jordan, Joanne M Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: Although osteoarthritis (OA) commonly involves multiple joints, no widely accepted method for quantifying whole-body OA burden exists. Therefore, our aim was to apply factor analytic methods to radiographic OA (rOA) grades across multiple joint sites, representing both presence and severity, to quantify the burden of rOA. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. The sample (n = 2092) had a mean age of 65 ± 11 years, body mass index (BMI) 31 ± 7 kg/m(2), with 33% men and 34% African Americans. A single expert reader (intra-rater κ = 0.89) provided radiographic grades based on standard atlases for the hands (30 joints, including bilateral distal and proximal interphalangeal [IP], thumb IP, metacarpophalangeal [MCP] and carpometacarpal [CMC] joints), knees (patellofemoral and tibiofemoral, 4 joints), hips (2 joints), and spine (5 levels [L1/2 to L5/S1]). All grades were entered into an exploratory common factor analysis as continuous variables. Stratified factor analyses were used to look for differences by gender, race, age, and cohort subgroups. RESULTS: Four factors were identified as follows: IP/CMC factor (20 joints), MCP factor (8 joints), Knee factor (4 joints), Spine factor (5 levels). These factors had high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α range 0.80 to 0.95), were not collapsible into a single factor, and had moderate between-factor correlations (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.24 to 0.44). There were no major differences in factor structure when stratified by subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The 4 factors obtained in this analysis indicate that the variables contained within each factor share an underlying cause, but the 4 factors are distinct, suggesting that combining these joint sites into one overall measure is not appropriate. Using such factors to reflect multi-joint rOA in statistical models can reduce the number of variables needed and increase precision. BioMed Central 2011 2011-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3308111/ /pubmed/22027269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3501 Text en Copyright ©2011 Nelson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nelson, Amanda E
DeVellis, Robert F
Renner, Jordan B
Schwartz, Todd A
Conaghan, Philip G
Kraus, Virginia B
Jordan, Joanne M
Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis
title Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis
title_full Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis
title_fullStr Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis
title_short Quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis
title_sort quantification of the whole-body burden of radiographic osteoarthritis using factor analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22027269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3501
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsonamandae quantificationofthewholebodyburdenofradiographicosteoarthritisusingfactoranalysis
AT devellisrobertf quantificationofthewholebodyburdenofradiographicosteoarthritisusingfactoranalysis
AT rennerjordanb quantificationofthewholebodyburdenofradiographicosteoarthritisusingfactoranalysis
AT schwartztodda quantificationofthewholebodyburdenofradiographicosteoarthritisusingfactoranalysis
AT conaghanphilipg quantificationofthewholebodyburdenofradiographicosteoarthritisusingfactoranalysis
AT krausvirginiab quantificationofthewholebodyburdenofradiographicosteoarthritisusingfactoranalysis
AT jordanjoannem quantificationofthewholebodyburdenofradiographicosteoarthritisusingfactoranalysis