Cargando…

Femoral head–neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement has been postulated as the important cause of primary osteoarthritis in non dysplastic hips. We postulated that the rarity of primary osteoarthritis of hip in Indian population could be attributable to morphological differences, specifically to a lower preval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malhotra, Rajesh, Kannan, Arun, Kancherla, Ramprasad, Khatri, Dharmesh, Kumar, Vijay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22448061
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.93681
_version_ 1782227440389586944
author Malhotra, Rajesh
Kannan, Arun
Kancherla, Ramprasad
Khatri, Dharmesh
Kumar, Vijay
author_facet Malhotra, Rajesh
Kannan, Arun
Kancherla, Ramprasad
Khatri, Dharmesh
Kumar, Vijay
author_sort Malhotra, Rajesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement has been postulated as the important cause of primary osteoarthritis in non dysplastic hips. We postulated that the rarity of primary osteoarthritis of hip in Indian population could be attributable to morphological differences, specifically to a lower prevalence of abnormal head–neck morphology. We conducted an anthropometric study to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal head–neck offset in Indian population and to correlate it with the low prevalence of primary osteoarthrosis in the Indian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The computed tomography (CT) images of 85 apparently normal hips were analysed. An axial image was created parallel to the central axis of the femoral neck and passing through the center of the femoral head using coronal scout view. This image was then used to calculate alpha and beta angles and the head–neck offset ratio. The measurements were made by two independent observers on two different occasions. RESULTS: The prevalence of abnormal head–neck offset ratio was 11.7% and the mean alpha and beta angles were 45.6° and 40.6°, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients for intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were, respectively, 0.84 and 0.80 for alpha angle, 0.80 and 0.77 for beta angle and 0.78 and 0.75 for head–neck offset ratio. The values were similar to those reported in the western population. CONCLUSION: The differences in the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis in Indian and western populations are not attributable to variation in the prevalence of abnormal head–neck offset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3308664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33086642012-03-23 Femoral head–neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study Malhotra, Rajesh Kannan, Arun Kancherla, Ramprasad Khatri, Dharmesh Kumar, Vijay Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement has been postulated as the important cause of primary osteoarthritis in non dysplastic hips. We postulated that the rarity of primary osteoarthritis of hip in Indian population could be attributable to morphological differences, specifically to a lower prevalence of abnormal head–neck morphology. We conducted an anthropometric study to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal head–neck offset in Indian population and to correlate it with the low prevalence of primary osteoarthrosis in the Indian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The computed tomography (CT) images of 85 apparently normal hips were analysed. An axial image was created parallel to the central axis of the femoral neck and passing through the center of the femoral head using coronal scout view. This image was then used to calculate alpha and beta angles and the head–neck offset ratio. The measurements were made by two independent observers on two different occasions. RESULTS: The prevalence of abnormal head–neck offset ratio was 11.7% and the mean alpha and beta angles were 45.6° and 40.6°, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients for intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were, respectively, 0.84 and 0.80 for alpha angle, 0.80 and 0.77 for beta angle and 0.78 and 0.75 for head–neck offset ratio. The values were similar to those reported in the western population. CONCLUSION: The differences in the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis in Indian and western populations are not attributable to variation in the prevalence of abnormal head–neck offset. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3308664/ /pubmed/22448061 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.93681 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Malhotra, Rajesh
Kannan, Arun
Kancherla, Ramprasad
Khatri, Dharmesh
Kumar, Vijay
Femoral head–neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study
title Femoral head–neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study
title_full Femoral head–neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study
title_fullStr Femoral head–neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study
title_full_unstemmed Femoral head–neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study
title_short Femoral head–neck offset in the Indian population: A CT based study
title_sort femoral head–neck offset in the indian population: a ct based study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3308664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22448061
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.93681
work_keys_str_mv AT malhotrarajesh femoralheadneckoffsetintheindianpopulationactbasedstudy
AT kannanarun femoralheadneckoffsetintheindianpopulationactbasedstudy
AT kancherlaramprasad femoralheadneckoffsetintheindianpopulationactbasedstudy
AT khatridharmesh femoralheadneckoffsetintheindianpopulationactbasedstudy
AT kumarvijay femoralheadneckoffsetintheindianpopulationactbasedstudy