Cargando…

The Test-Retest Reliability of Supraspinatus Cross-Sectional Area Measurement by Sonography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of supraspinatus cross-sectional area measurement by ultrasonography. METHOD: Both shoulders of 11 normal subjects (22 shoulders in total) were included in this study. The supraspinatus muscle was examined with the arm alongside the body in the coro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yang Soo, Heo, Nam Yeon, Kim, Min Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22506168
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.524
_version_ 1782227494796001280
author Kim, Yang Soo
Heo, Nam Yeon
Kim, Min Wook
author_facet Kim, Yang Soo
Heo, Nam Yeon
Kim, Min Wook
author_sort Kim, Yang Soo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of supraspinatus cross-sectional area measurement by ultrasonography. METHOD: Both shoulders of 11 normal subjects (22 shoulders in total) were included in this study. The supraspinatus muscle was examined with the arm alongside the body in the coronal oblique and sagittal oblique planes. The occupational ratio of the supraspinatus fossa was measured. To calculate the occupational ratio, the Y view of MRI was reproduced with sonography by locating the suprascapular notch in the coronal oblique plane (in the plane of the scapula) and then rotating the transducer 90° to that plane. The cross-sectional area was measured using the tracing and ellipse tool. The second measurement was performed 7 days after the initial measurement. RESULTS: The Pearson correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient between the first and the second occupational ratio measurements were 0.43 and 0.44, respectively, for the tracing method, and 0.53 and 0.47, respectively, for the ellipsoidal method. The difference between the first and second occupational ratio measurement was 4.1±3.9% (0.1-13.2%) for the tracing method, and 4.5±3.4% (0.01-10.5%) for the ellipsoidal method. The maximum difference was 13.2%. The occupational ratio was 86.2±5.3% (70.6-95.8%) for the tracing method and 85.0±5.2% (69.3-96.1%) for the ellipsoidal method. CONCLUSION: Supraspinatus occupational ratio by sonography is a low to moderately reliable intrarater method. However, the maximum difference was not significant. The main reason for its low to moderate reliability was the narrow value range. Therefore, the study method should be re-evaluated in stroke patients and in patients with rotator cuff disease. Knowledge of the anatomy is a prerequisite to attain intrarater reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3309232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33092322012-04-04 The Test-Retest Reliability of Supraspinatus Cross-Sectional Area Measurement by Sonography Kim, Yang Soo Heo, Nam Yeon Kim, Min Wook Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of supraspinatus cross-sectional area measurement by ultrasonography. METHOD: Both shoulders of 11 normal subjects (22 shoulders in total) were included in this study. The supraspinatus muscle was examined with the arm alongside the body in the coronal oblique and sagittal oblique planes. The occupational ratio of the supraspinatus fossa was measured. To calculate the occupational ratio, the Y view of MRI was reproduced with sonography by locating the suprascapular notch in the coronal oblique plane (in the plane of the scapula) and then rotating the transducer 90° to that plane. The cross-sectional area was measured using the tracing and ellipse tool. The second measurement was performed 7 days after the initial measurement. RESULTS: The Pearson correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient between the first and the second occupational ratio measurements were 0.43 and 0.44, respectively, for the tracing method, and 0.53 and 0.47, respectively, for the ellipsoidal method. The difference between the first and second occupational ratio measurement was 4.1±3.9% (0.1-13.2%) for the tracing method, and 4.5±3.4% (0.01-10.5%) for the ellipsoidal method. The maximum difference was 13.2%. The occupational ratio was 86.2±5.3% (70.6-95.8%) for the tracing method and 85.0±5.2% (69.3-96.1%) for the ellipsoidal method. CONCLUSION: Supraspinatus occupational ratio by sonography is a low to moderately reliable intrarater method. However, the maximum difference was not significant. The main reason for its low to moderate reliability was the narrow value range. Therefore, the study method should be re-evaluated in stroke patients and in patients with rotator cuff disease. Knowledge of the anatomy is a prerequisite to attain intrarater reliability. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2011-08 2011-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3309232/ /pubmed/22506168 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.524 Text en Copyright © 2011 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Yang Soo
Heo, Nam Yeon
Kim, Min Wook
The Test-Retest Reliability of Supraspinatus Cross-Sectional Area Measurement by Sonography
title The Test-Retest Reliability of Supraspinatus Cross-Sectional Area Measurement by Sonography
title_full The Test-Retest Reliability of Supraspinatus Cross-Sectional Area Measurement by Sonography
title_fullStr The Test-Retest Reliability of Supraspinatus Cross-Sectional Area Measurement by Sonography
title_full_unstemmed The Test-Retest Reliability of Supraspinatus Cross-Sectional Area Measurement by Sonography
title_short The Test-Retest Reliability of Supraspinatus Cross-Sectional Area Measurement by Sonography
title_sort test-retest reliability of supraspinatus cross-sectional area measurement by sonography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22506168
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.524
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyangsoo thetestretestreliabilityofsupraspinatuscrosssectionalareameasurementbysonography
AT heonamyeon thetestretestreliabilityofsupraspinatuscrosssectionalareameasurementbysonography
AT kimminwook thetestretestreliabilityofsupraspinatuscrosssectionalareameasurementbysonography
AT kimyangsoo testretestreliabilityofsupraspinatuscrosssectionalareameasurementbysonography
AT heonamyeon testretestreliabilityofsupraspinatuscrosssectionalareameasurementbysonography
AT kimminwook testretestreliabilityofsupraspinatuscrosssectionalareameasurementbysonography