Cargando…
Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate motor excitability and hand function on the non-dominant side according to the polarity of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the motor cortex in a healthy person. METHOD: tDCS was applied to the hand motor cortex for 15 minutes at an intensity of 1 mA in 28 hea...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22506229 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.1 |
_version_ | 1782227506025201664 |
---|---|
author | Sohn, Min Kyun Kim, Bong Ok Song, Hyun Tak |
author_facet | Sohn, Min Kyun Kim, Bong Ok Song, Hyun Tak |
author_sort | Sohn, Min Kyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate motor excitability and hand function on the non-dominant side according to the polarity of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the motor cortex in a healthy person. METHOD: tDCS was applied to the hand motor cortex for 15 minutes at an intensity of 1 mA in 28 healthy right-handed adults. Subjects were divided randomly into four groups: an anodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere group, a cathodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere group, an anodal tDCS of the dominant hemisphere group, and a sham group. We measured the motor evoked potential (MEP) in the abductor pollicis brevis and Jabsen-Taylor hand function test (JTT) in the non-dominant hand prior to and following tDCS. All study procedures were done under double-blind design. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the MEP amplitude and a significant improvement in the JTT in the non-dominant hand following anodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere (p<0.05). But there was no change in JTT and a significant decrease in the MEP amplitude in the non-dominant hand following cathodal tDCS on the non-dominant hemisphere and anodal tDCS of the dominant hemisphere. CONCLUSION: Non-dominant hand function is improved by increased excitability of the motor cortex. Although motor cortex excitability is decreased in a healthy person, non-dominant hand function is maintained. A homeostatic mechanism in the brain might therefore be involved in preserving this function. Further studies are warranted to examine brain functions to clarify this mechanism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3309318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33093182012-04-04 Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function Sohn, Min Kyun Kim, Bong Ok Song, Hyun Tak Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate motor excitability and hand function on the non-dominant side according to the polarity of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the motor cortex in a healthy person. METHOD: tDCS was applied to the hand motor cortex for 15 minutes at an intensity of 1 mA in 28 healthy right-handed adults. Subjects were divided randomly into four groups: an anodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere group, a cathodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere group, an anodal tDCS of the dominant hemisphere group, and a sham group. We measured the motor evoked potential (MEP) in the abductor pollicis brevis and Jabsen-Taylor hand function test (JTT) in the non-dominant hand prior to and following tDCS. All study procedures were done under double-blind design. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the MEP amplitude and a significant improvement in the JTT in the non-dominant hand following anodal tDCS of the non-dominant hemisphere (p<0.05). But there was no change in JTT and a significant decrease in the MEP amplitude in the non-dominant hand following cathodal tDCS on the non-dominant hemisphere and anodal tDCS of the dominant hemisphere. CONCLUSION: Non-dominant hand function is improved by increased excitability of the motor cortex. Although motor cortex excitability is decreased in a healthy person, non-dominant hand function is maintained. A homeostatic mechanism in the brain might therefore be involved in preserving this function. Further studies are warranted to examine brain functions to clarify this mechanism. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2012-02 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3309318/ /pubmed/22506229 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.1 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sohn, Min Kyun Kim, Bong Ok Song, Hyun Tak Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function |
title | Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function |
title_full | Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function |
title_fullStr | Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function |
title_short | Effect of Stimulation Polarity of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Non-dominant Hand Function |
title_sort | effect of stimulation polarity of transcranial direct current stimulation on non-dominant hand function |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22506229 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sohnminkyun effectofstimulationpolarityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonnondominanthandfunction AT kimbongok effectofstimulationpolarityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonnondominanthandfunction AT songhyuntak effectofstimulationpolarityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonnondominanthandfunction |