Cargando…
Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization
INTRODUCTION: Although coronary microembolization (CME) is a frequent phenomenon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, few data are available on the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) after CME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457677 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.27283 |
_version_ | 1782227521211727872 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Jianying Qian, Juying Ge, Junbo Zeng, Xin Sun, Aijun Chang, Shufu Chen, Zhangwei Zou, Yunzeng |
author_facet | Ma, Jianying Qian, Juying Ge, Junbo Zeng, Xin Sun, Aijun Chang, Shufu Chen, Zhangwei Zou, Yunzeng |
author_sort | Ma, Jianying |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Although coronary microembolization (CME) is a frequent phenomenon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, few data are available on the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) after CME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, six miniature swine of either sex (body weight 21-25 kg) were used to prepare a CME model. After coronary angiography, 1.2 × 10(5) microspheres (42 µm) were selectively infused into the left anterior descending artery via an infusion catheter. Left ventricular ejection fraction was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography; myocardial blood flow was measured using coloured microspheres; and CFR and coronary pressure were measured using Doppler and a pressure wire. RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.77 ±0.08 at baseline, 0.69 ±0.08 at 2 h, 0.68 ±0.08 at 6 h, and 0.76 ±0.06 at 1 week (2 h vs. baseline p < 0.05; 6 h vs. baseline p < 0.01). After CME, left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) and end diastolic volume (LVEDV) were significant larger 1 week later (p < 0.01 for both), while CFR was significantly reduced at 6 h (1.24 ±0.10 at 6 h vs. 1.77 ±0.30 at baseline, p < 0.01) and myocardial blood flow remained unchanged. Serum ET-1 level was significantly higher only at 6 h after CME (6 h vs. baseline p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of CFR and LVEF is significant at 6 h after CME and recovers 1 week later with left ventricular dilation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3309439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33094392012-03-28 Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization Ma, Jianying Qian, Juying Ge, Junbo Zeng, Xin Sun, Aijun Chang, Shufu Chen, Zhangwei Zou, Yunzeng Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Although coronary microembolization (CME) is a frequent phenomenon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, few data are available on the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) after CME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, six miniature swine of either sex (body weight 21-25 kg) were used to prepare a CME model. After coronary angiography, 1.2 × 10(5) microspheres (42 µm) were selectively infused into the left anterior descending artery via an infusion catheter. Left ventricular ejection fraction was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography; myocardial blood flow was measured using coloured microspheres; and CFR and coronary pressure were measured using Doppler and a pressure wire. RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.77 ±0.08 at baseline, 0.69 ±0.08 at 2 h, 0.68 ±0.08 at 6 h, and 0.76 ±0.06 at 1 week (2 h vs. baseline p < 0.05; 6 h vs. baseline p < 0.01). After CME, left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) and end diastolic volume (LVEDV) were significant larger 1 week later (p < 0.01 for both), while CFR was significantly reduced at 6 h (1.24 ±0.10 at 6 h vs. 1.77 ±0.30 at baseline, p < 0.01) and myocardial blood flow remained unchanged. Serum ET-1 level was significantly higher only at 6 h after CME (6 h vs. baseline p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of CFR and LVEF is significant at 6 h after CME and recovers 1 week later with left ventricular dilation. Termedia Publishing House 2012-02-29 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3309439/ /pubmed/22457677 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.27283 Text en Copyright © 2012 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Ma, Jianying Qian, Juying Ge, Junbo Zeng, Xin Sun, Aijun Chang, Shufu Chen, Zhangwei Zou, Yunzeng Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization |
title | Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization |
title_full | Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization |
title_fullStr | Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization |
title_short | Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization |
title_sort | changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457677 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.27283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majianying changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization AT qianjuying changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization AT gejunbo changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization AT zengxin changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization AT sunaijun changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization AT changshufu changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization AT chenzhangwei changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization AT zouyunzeng changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization |