Cargando…

Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization

INTRODUCTION: Although coronary microembolization (CME) is a frequent phenomenon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, few data are available on the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) after CME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Jianying, Qian, Juying, Ge, Junbo, Zeng, Xin, Sun, Aijun, Chang, Shufu, Chen, Zhangwei, Zou, Yunzeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457677
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.27283
_version_ 1782227521211727872
author Ma, Jianying
Qian, Juying
Ge, Junbo
Zeng, Xin
Sun, Aijun
Chang, Shufu
Chen, Zhangwei
Zou, Yunzeng
author_facet Ma, Jianying
Qian, Juying
Ge, Junbo
Zeng, Xin
Sun, Aijun
Chang, Shufu
Chen, Zhangwei
Zou, Yunzeng
author_sort Ma, Jianying
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although coronary microembolization (CME) is a frequent phenomenon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, few data are available on the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) after CME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, six miniature swine of either sex (body weight 21-25 kg) were used to prepare a CME model. After coronary angiography, 1.2 × 10(5) microspheres (42 µm) were selectively infused into the left anterior descending artery via an infusion catheter. Left ventricular ejection fraction was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography; myocardial blood flow was measured using coloured microspheres; and CFR and coronary pressure were measured using Doppler and a pressure wire. RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.77 ±0.08 at baseline, 0.69 ±0.08 at 2 h, 0.68 ±0.08 at 6 h, and 0.76 ±0.06 at 1 week (2 h vs. baseline p < 0.05; 6 h vs. baseline p < 0.01). After CME, left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) and end diastolic volume (LVEDV) were significant larger 1 week later (p < 0.01 for both), while CFR was significantly reduced at 6 h (1.24 ±0.10 at 6 h vs. 1.77 ±0.30 at baseline, p < 0.01) and myocardial blood flow remained unchanged. Serum ET-1 level was significantly higher only at 6 h after CME (6 h vs. baseline p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of CFR and LVEF is significant at 6 h after CME and recovers 1 week later with left ventricular dilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3309439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33094392012-03-28 Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization Ma, Jianying Qian, Juying Ge, Junbo Zeng, Xin Sun, Aijun Chang, Shufu Chen, Zhangwei Zou, Yunzeng Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Although coronary microembolization (CME) is a frequent phenomenon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, few data are available on the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) after CME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, six miniature swine of either sex (body weight 21-25 kg) were used to prepare a CME model. After coronary angiography, 1.2 × 10(5) microspheres (42 µm) were selectively infused into the left anterior descending artery via an infusion catheter. Left ventricular ejection fraction was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography; myocardial blood flow was measured using coloured microspheres; and CFR and coronary pressure were measured using Doppler and a pressure wire. RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.77 ±0.08 at baseline, 0.69 ±0.08 at 2 h, 0.68 ±0.08 at 6 h, and 0.76 ±0.06 at 1 week (2 h vs. baseline p < 0.05; 6 h vs. baseline p < 0.01). After CME, left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) and end diastolic volume (LVEDV) were significant larger 1 week later (p < 0.01 for both), while CFR was significantly reduced at 6 h (1.24 ±0.10 at 6 h vs. 1.77 ±0.30 at baseline, p < 0.01) and myocardial blood flow remained unchanged. Serum ET-1 level was significantly higher only at 6 h after CME (6 h vs. baseline p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of CFR and LVEF is significant at 6 h after CME and recovers 1 week later with left ventricular dilation. Termedia Publishing House 2012-02-29 2012-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3309439/ /pubmed/22457677 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.27283 Text en Copyright © 2012 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ma, Jianying
Qian, Juying
Ge, Junbo
Zeng, Xin
Sun, Aijun
Chang, Shufu
Chen, Zhangwei
Zou, Yunzeng
Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization
title Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization
title_full Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization
title_fullStr Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization
title_full_unstemmed Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization
title_short Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization
title_sort changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and coronary flow reserve after coronary microembolization
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457677
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.27283
work_keys_str_mv AT majianying changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization
AT qianjuying changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization
AT gejunbo changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization
AT zengxin changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization
AT sunaijun changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization
AT changshufu changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization
AT chenzhangwei changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization
AT zouyunzeng changesinleftventricularejectionfractionandcoronaryflowreserveaftercoronarymicroembolization