Cargando…

Goettingen Minipigs (GMP): Comparison of Two Different Models for Inducing Diabetes

PURPOSE: Preclinical experiments on large animals are indispensable for evaluating the effectiveness of diabetes therapies. Miniature swine are well suited for such studies due to their physiological and pathophysiological responses. METHODS: We compare two methods for inducing diabetes in Goettinge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strauss, Armin, Moskalenko, Vasily, Tiurbe, Christian, Chodnevskaja, Irina, Timm, Stephan, Wiegering, Verena A, Germer, Christoph-Thomas, Ulrichs, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22390349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-4-7
_version_ 1782227592556838912
author Strauss, Armin
Moskalenko, Vasily
Tiurbe, Christian
Chodnevskaja, Irina
Timm, Stephan
Wiegering, Verena A
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Ulrichs, Karin
author_facet Strauss, Armin
Moskalenko, Vasily
Tiurbe, Christian
Chodnevskaja, Irina
Timm, Stephan
Wiegering, Verena A
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Ulrichs, Karin
author_sort Strauss, Armin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Preclinical experiments on large animals are indispensable for evaluating the effectiveness of diabetes therapies. Miniature swine are well suited for such studies due to their physiological and pathophysiological responses. METHODS: We compare two methods for inducing diabetes in Goettingen minipigs (GMP), in five with the beta cell toxin streptozotocin (STZ) and in five other GMP by total pancreatectomy (PE). Glucose homeostasis was assessed with the intravenous glucose-tolerance test (IVGTT) and continual monitoring of interstitial glucose levels. At conclusion of the observation period, the pancreata were examined histologically. Three non-diabetic GMP served as control group. RESULTS: The IVGTT revealed markedly diabetic profiles in both GMP groups. STZ-GMP were found to harbor residual C-peptides and scattered insulin-positive cells in the pancreas. PE-GMP survived the total pancreatectomy only with intensive postoperative care. CONCLUSIONS: Although both methods reliably induced diabetes in GMP, the PE-GMP clearly had more health problems and required a greater expenditure of time and resources. The PE-GMP model, however, was better at eliminating endogenous insulin and C-peptide than the STZ-GMP model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3309977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33099772012-03-23 Goettingen Minipigs (GMP): Comparison of Two Different Models for Inducing Diabetes Strauss, Armin Moskalenko, Vasily Tiurbe, Christian Chodnevskaja, Irina Timm, Stephan Wiegering, Verena A Germer, Christoph-Thomas Ulrichs, Karin Diabetol Metab Syndr Research PURPOSE: Preclinical experiments on large animals are indispensable for evaluating the effectiveness of diabetes therapies. Miniature swine are well suited for such studies due to their physiological and pathophysiological responses. METHODS: We compare two methods for inducing diabetes in Goettingen minipigs (GMP), in five with the beta cell toxin streptozotocin (STZ) and in five other GMP by total pancreatectomy (PE). Glucose homeostasis was assessed with the intravenous glucose-tolerance test (IVGTT) and continual monitoring of interstitial glucose levels. At conclusion of the observation period, the pancreata were examined histologically. Three non-diabetic GMP served as control group. RESULTS: The IVGTT revealed markedly diabetic profiles in both GMP groups. STZ-GMP were found to harbor residual C-peptides and scattered insulin-positive cells in the pancreas. PE-GMP survived the total pancreatectomy only with intensive postoperative care. CONCLUSIONS: Although both methods reliably induced diabetes in GMP, the PE-GMP clearly had more health problems and required a greater expenditure of time and resources. The PE-GMP model, however, was better at eliminating endogenous insulin and C-peptide than the STZ-GMP model. BioMed Central 2012-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3309977/ /pubmed/22390349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-4-7 Text en Copyright ©2012 Strauss et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Strauss, Armin
Moskalenko, Vasily
Tiurbe, Christian
Chodnevskaja, Irina
Timm, Stephan
Wiegering, Verena A
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Ulrichs, Karin
Goettingen Minipigs (GMP): Comparison of Two Different Models for Inducing Diabetes
title Goettingen Minipigs (GMP): Comparison of Two Different Models for Inducing Diabetes
title_full Goettingen Minipigs (GMP): Comparison of Two Different Models for Inducing Diabetes
title_fullStr Goettingen Minipigs (GMP): Comparison of Two Different Models for Inducing Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Goettingen Minipigs (GMP): Comparison of Two Different Models for Inducing Diabetes
title_short Goettingen Minipigs (GMP): Comparison of Two Different Models for Inducing Diabetes
title_sort goettingen minipigs (gmp): comparison of two different models for inducing diabetes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3309977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22390349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-4-7
work_keys_str_mv AT straussarmin goettingenminipigsgmpcomparisonoftwodifferentmodelsforinducingdiabetes
AT moskalenkovasily goettingenminipigsgmpcomparisonoftwodifferentmodelsforinducingdiabetes
AT tiurbechristian goettingenminipigsgmpcomparisonoftwodifferentmodelsforinducingdiabetes
AT chodnevskajairina goettingenminipigsgmpcomparisonoftwodifferentmodelsforinducingdiabetes
AT timmstephan goettingenminipigsgmpcomparisonoftwodifferentmodelsforinducingdiabetes
AT wiegeringverenaa goettingenminipigsgmpcomparisonoftwodifferentmodelsforinducingdiabetes
AT germerchristophthomas goettingenminipigsgmpcomparisonoftwodifferentmodelsforinducingdiabetes
AT ulrichskarin goettingenminipigsgmpcomparisonoftwodifferentmodelsforinducingdiabetes