Cargando…

Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial

Self-assessment of symptom progression in chronic diseases is of increasing importance in clinical research, patient management and specialized outpatient care. Against this background, we developed a secure internet platform (ALShome.de) that allows online assessment of the revised ALS Functional R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maier, André, Holm, Teresa, Wicks, Paul, Steinfurth, Laura, Linke, Peter, Münch, Christoph, Meyer, Robert, Meyer, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3310482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22292842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2011.633268
_version_ 1782227653396267008
author Maier, André
Holm, Teresa
Wicks, Paul
Steinfurth, Laura
Linke, Peter
Münch, Christoph
Meyer, Robert
Meyer, Thomas
author_facet Maier, André
Holm, Teresa
Wicks, Paul
Steinfurth, Laura
Linke, Peter
Münch, Christoph
Meyer, Robert
Meyer, Thomas
author_sort Maier, André
collection PubMed
description Self-assessment of symptom progression in chronic diseases is of increasing importance in clinical research, patient management and specialized outpatient care. Against this background, we developed a secure internet platform (ALShome.de) that allows online assessment of the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and other established self-assessment questionnaires. We developed a secure and closed internet portal to assess patient reported outcomes. In a prospective, controlled and stratified study, patients conducted a web-based self-assessment of ALSFRS-R compared to on-site assessment. On-site and online assessments were compared at baseline (n = 127) and after 3.5 months (n = 81, 64%). Results showed that correlation between on-site evaluation and online testing of ALSFRS-R was highly significant (r = 0.96; p < 0.001). The agreement of both capturing methods (online vs. on-site) was excellent (mean interval, 8.8 days). The adherence to online rating was high; 75% of patients tested on-site completed a follow-up online visit (mean 3.5 months, SD 1.7). We conclude that online self-assessment of ALS severity complements the well-established face-to-face application of the ALSFRS-R during on-site visits. The results of our study support the use of online administration of ALSFRS-R within clinical trials and for managing the care of ALS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3310482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33104822012-04-03 Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial Maier, André Holm, Teresa Wicks, Paul Steinfurth, Laura Linke, Peter Münch, Christoph Meyer, Robert Meyer, Thomas Amyotroph Lateral Scler Original Article Self-assessment of symptom progression in chronic diseases is of increasing importance in clinical research, patient management and specialized outpatient care. Against this background, we developed a secure internet platform (ALShome.de) that allows online assessment of the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and other established self-assessment questionnaires. We developed a secure and closed internet portal to assess patient reported outcomes. In a prospective, controlled and stratified study, patients conducted a web-based self-assessment of ALSFRS-R compared to on-site assessment. On-site and online assessments were compared at baseline (n = 127) and after 3.5 months (n = 81, 64%). Results showed that correlation between on-site evaluation and online testing of ALSFRS-R was highly significant (r = 0.96; p < 0.001). The agreement of both capturing methods (online vs. on-site) was excellent (mean interval, 8.8 days). The adherence to online rating was high; 75% of patients tested on-site completed a follow-up online visit (mean 3.5 months, SD 1.7). We conclude that online self-assessment of ALS severity complements the well-established face-to-face application of the ALSFRS-R during on-site visits. The results of our study support the use of online administration of ALSFRS-R within clinical trials and for managing the care of ALS patients. Informa Healthcare 2012-02 2012-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3310482/ /pubmed/22292842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2011.633268 Text en © 2012 by Informa Healthcare USA, Inc http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Informa Healthcare journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maier, André
Holm, Teresa
Wicks, Paul
Steinfurth, Laura
Linke, Peter
Münch, Christoph
Meyer, Robert
Meyer, Thomas
Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial
title Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial
title_full Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial
title_fullStr Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial
title_full_unstemmed Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial
title_short Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial
title_sort online assessment of als functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: a prospective trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3310482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22292842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2011.633268
work_keys_str_mv AT maierandre onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial
AT holmteresa onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial
AT wickspaul onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial
AT steinfurthlaura onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial
AT linkepeter onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial
AT munchchristoph onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial
AT meyerrobert onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial
AT meyerthomas onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial