Cargando…
Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial
Self-assessment of symptom progression in chronic diseases is of increasing importance in clinical research, patient management and specialized outpatient care. Against this background, we developed a secure internet platform (ALShome.de) that allows online assessment of the revised ALS Functional R...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3310482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22292842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2011.633268 |
_version_ | 1782227653396267008 |
---|---|
author | Maier, André Holm, Teresa Wicks, Paul Steinfurth, Laura Linke, Peter Münch, Christoph Meyer, Robert Meyer, Thomas |
author_facet | Maier, André Holm, Teresa Wicks, Paul Steinfurth, Laura Linke, Peter Münch, Christoph Meyer, Robert Meyer, Thomas |
author_sort | Maier, André |
collection | PubMed |
description | Self-assessment of symptom progression in chronic diseases is of increasing importance in clinical research, patient management and specialized outpatient care. Against this background, we developed a secure internet platform (ALShome.de) that allows online assessment of the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and other established self-assessment questionnaires. We developed a secure and closed internet portal to assess patient reported outcomes. In a prospective, controlled and stratified study, patients conducted a web-based self-assessment of ALSFRS-R compared to on-site assessment. On-site and online assessments were compared at baseline (n = 127) and after 3.5 months (n = 81, 64%). Results showed that correlation between on-site evaluation and online testing of ALSFRS-R was highly significant (r = 0.96; p < 0.001). The agreement of both capturing methods (online vs. on-site) was excellent (mean interval, 8.8 days). The adherence to online rating was high; 75% of patients tested on-site completed a follow-up online visit (mean 3.5 months, SD 1.7). We conclude that online self-assessment of ALS severity complements the well-established face-to-face application of the ALSFRS-R during on-site visits. The results of our study support the use of online administration of ALSFRS-R within clinical trials and for managing the care of ALS patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3310482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33104822012-04-03 Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial Maier, André Holm, Teresa Wicks, Paul Steinfurth, Laura Linke, Peter Münch, Christoph Meyer, Robert Meyer, Thomas Amyotroph Lateral Scler Original Article Self-assessment of symptom progression in chronic diseases is of increasing importance in clinical research, patient management and specialized outpatient care. Against this background, we developed a secure internet platform (ALShome.de) that allows online assessment of the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and other established self-assessment questionnaires. We developed a secure and closed internet portal to assess patient reported outcomes. In a prospective, controlled and stratified study, patients conducted a web-based self-assessment of ALSFRS-R compared to on-site assessment. On-site and online assessments were compared at baseline (n = 127) and after 3.5 months (n = 81, 64%). Results showed that correlation between on-site evaluation and online testing of ALSFRS-R was highly significant (r = 0.96; p < 0.001). The agreement of both capturing methods (online vs. on-site) was excellent (mean interval, 8.8 days). The adherence to online rating was high; 75% of patients tested on-site completed a follow-up online visit (mean 3.5 months, SD 1.7). We conclude that online self-assessment of ALS severity complements the well-established face-to-face application of the ALSFRS-R during on-site visits. The results of our study support the use of online administration of ALSFRS-R within clinical trials and for managing the care of ALS patients. Informa Healthcare 2012-02 2012-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3310482/ /pubmed/22292842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2011.633268 Text en © 2012 by Informa Healthcare USA, Inc http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Informa Healthcare journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Maier, André Holm, Teresa Wicks, Paul Steinfurth, Laura Linke, Peter Münch, Christoph Meyer, Robert Meyer, Thomas Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial |
title | Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial |
title_full | Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial |
title_fullStr | Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial |
title_short | Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial |
title_sort | online assessment of als functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: a prospective trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3310482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22292842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2011.633268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maierandre onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial AT holmteresa onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial AT wickspaul onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial AT steinfurthlaura onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial AT linkepeter onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial AT munchchristoph onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial AT meyerrobert onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial AT meyerthomas onlineassessmentofalsfunctionalratingscalecompareswelltoinclinicevaluationaprospectivetrial |