Cargando…

Reanalysis and Simulation Suggest a Phylogenetic Microarray Does Not Accurately Profile Microbial Communities

The second generation (G2) PhyloChip is designed to detect over 8700 bacteria and archaeal and has been used over 50 publications and conference presentations. Many of those publications reveal that the PhyloChip measures of species richness greatly exceed statistical estimates of richness based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Midgley, David J., Greenfield, Paul, Shaw, Janet M., Oytam, Yalchin, Li, Dongmei, Kerr, Caroline A., Hendry, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3310882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033875
_version_ 1782227723647713280
author Midgley, David J.
Greenfield, Paul
Shaw, Janet M.
Oytam, Yalchin
Li, Dongmei
Kerr, Caroline A.
Hendry, Philip
author_facet Midgley, David J.
Greenfield, Paul
Shaw, Janet M.
Oytam, Yalchin
Li, Dongmei
Kerr, Caroline A.
Hendry, Philip
author_sort Midgley, David J.
collection PubMed
description The second generation (G2) PhyloChip is designed to detect over 8700 bacteria and archaeal and has been used over 50 publications and conference presentations. Many of those publications reveal that the PhyloChip measures of species richness greatly exceed statistical estimates of richness based on other methods. An examination of probes downloaded from Greengenes suggested that the system may have the potential to distort the observed community structure. This may be due to the sharing of probes by taxa; more than 21% of the taxa in that downloaded data have no unique probes. In-silico simulations using these data showed that a population of 64 taxa representing a typical anaerobic subterranean community returned 96 different taxa, including 15 families incorrectly called present and 19 families incorrectly called absent. A study of nasal and oropharyngeal microbial communities by Lemon et al (2010) found some 1325 taxa using the G2 PhyloChip, however, about 950 of these taxa have, in the downloaded data, no unique probes and cannot be definitively called present. Finally, data from Brodie et al (2007), when re-examined, indicate that the abundance of the majority of detected taxa, are highly correlated with one another, suggesting that many probe sets do not act independently. Based on our analyses of downloaded data, we conclude that outputs from the G2 PhyloChip should be treated with some caution, and that the presence of taxa represented solely by non-unique probes be independently verified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3310882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33108822012-03-28 Reanalysis and Simulation Suggest a Phylogenetic Microarray Does Not Accurately Profile Microbial Communities Midgley, David J. Greenfield, Paul Shaw, Janet M. Oytam, Yalchin Li, Dongmei Kerr, Caroline A. Hendry, Philip PLoS One Research Article The second generation (G2) PhyloChip is designed to detect over 8700 bacteria and archaeal and has been used over 50 publications and conference presentations. Many of those publications reveal that the PhyloChip measures of species richness greatly exceed statistical estimates of richness based on other methods. An examination of probes downloaded from Greengenes suggested that the system may have the potential to distort the observed community structure. This may be due to the sharing of probes by taxa; more than 21% of the taxa in that downloaded data have no unique probes. In-silico simulations using these data showed that a population of 64 taxa representing a typical anaerobic subterranean community returned 96 different taxa, including 15 families incorrectly called present and 19 families incorrectly called absent. A study of nasal and oropharyngeal microbial communities by Lemon et al (2010) found some 1325 taxa using the G2 PhyloChip, however, about 950 of these taxa have, in the downloaded data, no unique probes and cannot be definitively called present. Finally, data from Brodie et al (2007), when re-examined, indicate that the abundance of the majority of detected taxa, are highly correlated with one another, suggesting that many probe sets do not act independently. Based on our analyses of downloaded data, we conclude that outputs from the G2 PhyloChip should be treated with some caution, and that the presence of taxa represented solely by non-unique probes be independently verified. Public Library of Science 2012-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3310882/ /pubmed/22457798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033875 Text en Midgley et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Midgley, David J.
Greenfield, Paul
Shaw, Janet M.
Oytam, Yalchin
Li, Dongmei
Kerr, Caroline A.
Hendry, Philip
Reanalysis and Simulation Suggest a Phylogenetic Microarray Does Not Accurately Profile Microbial Communities
title Reanalysis and Simulation Suggest a Phylogenetic Microarray Does Not Accurately Profile Microbial Communities
title_full Reanalysis and Simulation Suggest a Phylogenetic Microarray Does Not Accurately Profile Microbial Communities
title_fullStr Reanalysis and Simulation Suggest a Phylogenetic Microarray Does Not Accurately Profile Microbial Communities
title_full_unstemmed Reanalysis and Simulation Suggest a Phylogenetic Microarray Does Not Accurately Profile Microbial Communities
title_short Reanalysis and Simulation Suggest a Phylogenetic Microarray Does Not Accurately Profile Microbial Communities
title_sort reanalysis and simulation suggest a phylogenetic microarray does not accurately profile microbial communities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3310882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033875
work_keys_str_mv AT midgleydavidj reanalysisandsimulationsuggestaphylogeneticmicroarraydoesnotaccuratelyprofilemicrobialcommunities
AT greenfieldpaul reanalysisandsimulationsuggestaphylogeneticmicroarraydoesnotaccuratelyprofilemicrobialcommunities
AT shawjanetm reanalysisandsimulationsuggestaphylogeneticmicroarraydoesnotaccuratelyprofilemicrobialcommunities
AT oytamyalchin reanalysisandsimulationsuggestaphylogeneticmicroarraydoesnotaccuratelyprofilemicrobialcommunities
AT lidongmei reanalysisandsimulationsuggestaphylogeneticmicroarraydoesnotaccuratelyprofilemicrobialcommunities
AT kerrcarolinea reanalysisandsimulationsuggestaphylogeneticmicroarraydoesnotaccuratelyprofilemicrobialcommunities
AT hendryphilip reanalysisandsimulationsuggestaphylogeneticmicroarraydoesnotaccuratelyprofilemicrobialcommunities