Cargando…

Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time

BACKGROUND: Accelerometers have been used to determine the amount of time that children spend sedentary. However, as time spent sitting may be detrimental to health, research is needed to examine whether accelerometer sedentary cut-points reflect the amount of time children spend sitting. The aim of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridgers, Nicola D, Salmon, Jo, Ridley, Kate, O'Connell, Eoin, Arundell, Lauren, Timperio, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3311087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22340137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-15
_version_ 1782227743631474688
author Ridgers, Nicola D
Salmon, Jo
Ridley, Kate
O'Connell, Eoin
Arundell, Lauren
Timperio, Anna
author_facet Ridgers, Nicola D
Salmon, Jo
Ridley, Kate
O'Connell, Eoin
Arundell, Lauren
Timperio, Anna
author_sort Ridgers, Nicola D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accelerometers have been used to determine the amount of time that children spend sedentary. However, as time spent sitting may be detrimental to health, research is needed to examine whether accelerometer sedentary cut-points reflect the amount of time children spend sitting. The aim of this study was to: a) examine agreement between ActiGraph (AG) cut-points for sedentary time and objectively-assessed periods of free-living sitting and sitting plus standing time using the activPAL (aP); and b) identify cut-points to determine time spent sitting and sitting plus standing. METHODS: Forty-eight children (54% boys) aged 8-12 years wore a waist-mounted AG and thigh-mounted aP for two consecutive school days (9-3:30 pm). AG data were analyzed using 17 cut-points between 50-850 counts·min(-1 )in 50 counts·min(-1 )increments to determine sedentary time during class-time, break time and school hours. Sitting and sitting plus standing time were obtained from the aP for these periods. Limits of agreement were computed to evaluate bias between AG50 to AG850 sedentary time and sitting and sitting plus standing time. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analyses identified AG cut-points that maximized sensitivity and specificity for sitting and sitting plus standing time. RESULTS: The smallest mean bias between aP sitting time and AG sedentary time was AG150 for class time (3.8 minutes), AG50 for break time (-0.8 minutes), and AG100 for school hours (-5.2 minutes). For sitting plus standing time, the smallest bias was observed for AG850. ROC analyses revealed an optimal cut-point of 96 counts·min(-1 )(AUC = 0.75) for sitting time, which had acceptable sensitivity (71.7%) and specificity (67.8%). No optimal cut-point was obtained for sitting plus standing (AUC = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of free-living sitting time in children during school hours can be obtained using an AG cut-point of 100 counts·min(-1). Higher sedentary cut-points may capture both sitting and standing time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3311087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33110872012-03-24 Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time Ridgers, Nicola D Salmon, Jo Ridley, Kate O'Connell, Eoin Arundell, Lauren Timperio, Anna Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Accelerometers have been used to determine the amount of time that children spend sedentary. However, as time spent sitting may be detrimental to health, research is needed to examine whether accelerometer sedentary cut-points reflect the amount of time children spend sitting. The aim of this study was to: a) examine agreement between ActiGraph (AG) cut-points for sedentary time and objectively-assessed periods of free-living sitting and sitting plus standing time using the activPAL (aP); and b) identify cut-points to determine time spent sitting and sitting plus standing. METHODS: Forty-eight children (54% boys) aged 8-12 years wore a waist-mounted AG and thigh-mounted aP for two consecutive school days (9-3:30 pm). AG data were analyzed using 17 cut-points between 50-850 counts·min(-1 )in 50 counts·min(-1 )increments to determine sedentary time during class-time, break time and school hours. Sitting and sitting plus standing time were obtained from the aP for these periods. Limits of agreement were computed to evaluate bias between AG50 to AG850 sedentary time and sitting and sitting plus standing time. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analyses identified AG cut-points that maximized sensitivity and specificity for sitting and sitting plus standing time. RESULTS: The smallest mean bias between aP sitting time and AG sedentary time was AG150 for class time (3.8 minutes), AG50 for break time (-0.8 minutes), and AG100 for school hours (-5.2 minutes). For sitting plus standing time, the smallest bias was observed for AG850. ROC analyses revealed an optimal cut-point of 96 counts·min(-1 )(AUC = 0.75) for sitting time, which had acceptable sensitivity (71.7%) and specificity (67.8%). No optimal cut-point was obtained for sitting plus standing (AUC = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of free-living sitting time in children during school hours can be obtained using an AG cut-point of 100 counts·min(-1). Higher sedentary cut-points may capture both sitting and standing time. BioMed Central 2012-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3311087/ /pubmed/22340137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-15 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ridgers et al; BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ridgers, Nicola D
Salmon, Jo
Ridley, Kate
O'Connell, Eoin
Arundell, Lauren
Timperio, Anna
Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time
title Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time
title_full Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time
title_fullStr Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time
title_full_unstemmed Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time
title_short Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time
title_sort agreement between activpal and actigraph for assessing children's sedentary time
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3311087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22340137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-15
work_keys_str_mv AT ridgersnicolad agreementbetweenactivpalandactigraphforassessingchildrenssedentarytime
AT salmonjo agreementbetweenactivpalandactigraphforassessingchildrenssedentarytime
AT ridleykate agreementbetweenactivpalandactigraphforassessingchildrenssedentarytime
AT oconnelleoin agreementbetweenactivpalandactigraphforassessingchildrenssedentarytime
AT arundelllauren agreementbetweenactivpalandactigraphforassessingchildrenssedentarytime
AT timperioanna agreementbetweenactivpalandactigraphforassessingchildrenssedentarytime