Cargando…

Time Course of Information Processing in Visual and Haptic Object Classification

Vision identifies objects rapidly and efficiently. In contrast, object recognition by touch is much slower. Furthermore, haptics usually serially accumulates information from different parts of objects, whereas vision typically processes object information in parallel. Is haptic object identificatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinovic, Jasna, Lawson, Rebecca, Craddock, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3311268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22470327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00049
_version_ 1782227771558199296
author Martinovic, Jasna
Lawson, Rebecca
Craddock, Matt
author_facet Martinovic, Jasna
Lawson, Rebecca
Craddock, Matt
author_sort Martinovic, Jasna
collection PubMed
description Vision identifies objects rapidly and efficiently. In contrast, object recognition by touch is much slower. Furthermore, haptics usually serially accumulates information from different parts of objects, whereas vision typically processes object information in parallel. Is haptic object identification slower simply due to sequential information acquisition and the resulting memory load or due to more fundamental processing differences between the senses? To compare the time course of visual and haptic object recognition, we slowed visual processing using a novel, restricted viewing technique. In an electroencephalographic (EEG) experiment, participants discriminated familiar, nameable from unfamiliar, unnamable objects both visually and haptically. Analyses focused on the evoked and total fronto-central theta-band (5–7 Hz; a marker of working memory) and the occipital upper alpha-band (10–12 Hz; a marker of perceptual processing) locked to the onset of classification. Decreases in total upper alpha-band activity for haptic identification of objects indicate a likely processing role of multisensory extrastriate areas. Long-latency modulations of alpha-band activity differentiated between familiar and unfamiliar objects in haptics but not in vision. In contrast, theta-band activity showed a general increase over time for the slowed-down visual recognition task only. We conclude that haptic object recognition relies on common representations with vision but also that there are fundamental differences between the senses that do not merely arise from differences in their speed of processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3311268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33112682012-04-02 Time Course of Information Processing in Visual and Haptic Object Classification Martinovic, Jasna Lawson, Rebecca Craddock, Matt Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Vision identifies objects rapidly and efficiently. In contrast, object recognition by touch is much slower. Furthermore, haptics usually serially accumulates information from different parts of objects, whereas vision typically processes object information in parallel. Is haptic object identification slower simply due to sequential information acquisition and the resulting memory load or due to more fundamental processing differences between the senses? To compare the time course of visual and haptic object recognition, we slowed visual processing using a novel, restricted viewing technique. In an electroencephalographic (EEG) experiment, participants discriminated familiar, nameable from unfamiliar, unnamable objects both visually and haptically. Analyses focused on the evoked and total fronto-central theta-band (5–7 Hz; a marker of working memory) and the occipital upper alpha-band (10–12 Hz; a marker of perceptual processing) locked to the onset of classification. Decreases in total upper alpha-band activity for haptic identification of objects indicate a likely processing role of multisensory extrastriate areas. Long-latency modulations of alpha-band activity differentiated between familiar and unfamiliar objects in haptics but not in vision. In contrast, theta-band activity showed a general increase over time for the slowed-down visual recognition task only. We conclude that haptic object recognition relies on common representations with vision but also that there are fundamental differences between the senses that do not merely arise from differences in their speed of processing. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3311268/ /pubmed/22470327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00049 Text en Copyright © 2012 Martinovic, Lawson and Craddock. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Martinovic, Jasna
Lawson, Rebecca
Craddock, Matt
Time Course of Information Processing in Visual and Haptic Object Classification
title Time Course of Information Processing in Visual and Haptic Object Classification
title_full Time Course of Information Processing in Visual and Haptic Object Classification
title_fullStr Time Course of Information Processing in Visual and Haptic Object Classification
title_full_unstemmed Time Course of Information Processing in Visual and Haptic Object Classification
title_short Time Course of Information Processing in Visual and Haptic Object Classification
title_sort time course of information processing in visual and haptic object classification
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3311268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22470327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00049
work_keys_str_mv AT martinovicjasna timecourseofinformationprocessinginvisualandhapticobjectclassification
AT lawsonrebecca timecourseofinformationprocessinginvisualandhapticobjectclassification
AT craddockmatt timecourseofinformationprocessinginvisualandhapticobjectclassification