Cargando…

FE-SEM Evaluation of Dental Specimens Prepared by Different Methods for In Vitro Contamination

Objective. To evaluate through FE-SEM the cleanliness and dentinal alterations promoted by different methods of dental sample preparation. Methods. Twenty-five human single-rooted teeth were used. The teeth were cleaned and autoclaved in wet medium and randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 5), accordi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Vitor Cesar, Kataoka, Simony Hidee Hamoy, Gavini, Giulio, Ferrari, Patrícia Helena, Cai, Silvana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/748471
_version_ 1782227831979245568
author Nakamura, Vitor Cesar
Kataoka, Simony Hidee Hamoy
Gavini, Giulio
Ferrari, Patrícia Helena
Cai, Silvana
author_facet Nakamura, Vitor Cesar
Kataoka, Simony Hidee Hamoy
Gavini, Giulio
Ferrari, Patrícia Helena
Cai, Silvana
author_sort Nakamura, Vitor Cesar
collection PubMed
description Objective. To evaluate through FE-SEM the cleanliness and dentinal alterations promoted by different methods of dental sample preparation. Methods. Twenty-five human single-rooted teeth were used. The teeth were cleaned and autoclaved in wet medium and randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 5), according to the preparation methods employed—control group: no solutions applied; group 1: cement removal and irrigation with 5.25% NaOCl  + 17 % EDTA for 4 minutes each; group 2: 17%  EDTA + 2.5% NaOCl (4 minutes ultrasonic bath); group 3: cement removal and 17%  EDTA + 5.25%  NaOCl + phosphate buffer solution + distilled water (10 minutes ultrasonic); group 4: 17%  EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl (3 minutes ultrasonic bath). Specimens were analyzed by field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), at 1500x magnification. Data were submitted to qualitative analysis according to a scoring system and submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test. Results. In ascending order, as to bind parameters, (i) cleanliness: control, group 2, group 3, group 5, and group 4, (ii) dentinal alterations: group 1, group 5, group 2, group 3, and group 4. Conclusion. The proposed protocol was suitable for subsequent microbiological contamination, because it showed less dentinal morphological alterations with increased removal of organic waste.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3312258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33122582012-04-13 FE-SEM Evaluation of Dental Specimens Prepared by Different Methods for In Vitro Contamination Nakamura, Vitor Cesar Kataoka, Simony Hidee Hamoy Gavini, Giulio Ferrari, Patrícia Helena Cai, Silvana Int J Dent Research Article Objective. To evaluate through FE-SEM the cleanliness and dentinal alterations promoted by different methods of dental sample preparation. Methods. Twenty-five human single-rooted teeth were used. The teeth were cleaned and autoclaved in wet medium and randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 5), according to the preparation methods employed—control group: no solutions applied; group 1: cement removal and irrigation with 5.25% NaOCl  + 17 % EDTA for 4 minutes each; group 2: 17%  EDTA + 2.5% NaOCl (4 minutes ultrasonic bath); group 3: cement removal and 17%  EDTA + 5.25%  NaOCl + phosphate buffer solution + distilled water (10 minutes ultrasonic); group 4: 17%  EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl (3 minutes ultrasonic bath). Specimens were analyzed by field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), at 1500x magnification. Data were submitted to qualitative analysis according to a scoring system and submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test. Results. In ascending order, as to bind parameters, (i) cleanliness: control, group 2, group 3, group 5, and group 4, (ii) dentinal alterations: group 1, group 5, group 2, group 3, and group 4. Conclusion. The proposed protocol was suitable for subsequent microbiological contamination, because it showed less dentinal morphological alterations with increased removal of organic waste. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3312258/ /pubmed/22505908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/748471 Text en Copyright © 2012 Vitor Cesar Nakamura et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakamura, Vitor Cesar
Kataoka, Simony Hidee Hamoy
Gavini, Giulio
Ferrari, Patrícia Helena
Cai, Silvana
FE-SEM Evaluation of Dental Specimens Prepared by Different Methods for In Vitro Contamination
title FE-SEM Evaluation of Dental Specimens Prepared by Different Methods for In Vitro Contamination
title_full FE-SEM Evaluation of Dental Specimens Prepared by Different Methods for In Vitro Contamination
title_fullStr FE-SEM Evaluation of Dental Specimens Prepared by Different Methods for In Vitro Contamination
title_full_unstemmed FE-SEM Evaluation of Dental Specimens Prepared by Different Methods for In Vitro Contamination
title_short FE-SEM Evaluation of Dental Specimens Prepared by Different Methods for In Vitro Contamination
title_sort fe-sem evaluation of dental specimens prepared by different methods for in vitro contamination
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/748471
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamuravitorcesar fesemevaluationofdentalspecimenspreparedbydifferentmethodsforinvitrocontamination
AT kataokasimonyhideehamoy fesemevaluationofdentalspecimenspreparedbydifferentmethodsforinvitrocontamination
AT gavinigiulio fesemevaluationofdentalspecimenspreparedbydifferentmethodsforinvitrocontamination
AT ferraripatriciahelena fesemevaluationofdentalspecimenspreparedbydifferentmethodsforinvitrocontamination
AT caisilvana fesemevaluationofdentalspecimenspreparedbydifferentmethodsforinvitrocontamination