Cargando…
Xenogenic Esophagus Scaffolds Fixed with Several Agents: Comparative In Vivo Study of Rejection and Inflammation
Most infants with long-gap esophageal atresia receive an esophageal replacement with tissue from stomach or colon, because the native esophagus is too short for true primary repair. Tissue-engineered esophageal conducts could present an attractive alternative. In this paper, circular decellularized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/948320 |
_version_ | 1782227852905676800 |
---|---|
author | Koch, Holger Graneist, Cora Emmrich, Frank Till, Holger Metzger, Roman Aupperle, Heike Schierle, Katrin Sack, Ulrich Boldt, Andreas |
author_facet | Koch, Holger Graneist, Cora Emmrich, Frank Till, Holger Metzger, Roman Aupperle, Heike Schierle, Katrin Sack, Ulrich Boldt, Andreas |
author_sort | Koch, Holger |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most infants with long-gap esophageal atresia receive an esophageal replacement with tissue from stomach or colon, because the native esophagus is too short for true primary repair. Tissue-engineered esophageal conducts could present an attractive alternative. In this paper, circular decellularized porcine esophageal scaffold tissues were implanted subcutaneously into Sprague-Dawley rats. Depending on scaffold cross-linking with genipin, glutaraldehyde, and carbodiimide (untreated scaffolds : positive control; bovine pericardium : gold standard), the number of infiltrating fibroblasts, lymphocytes, macrophages, giant cells, and capillaries was determined to quantify the host response after 1, 9, and 30 days. Decellularized esophagus scaffolds were shown to maintain native matrix morphology and extracellular matrix composition. Typical inflammatory reactions were observed in all implants; however, the cellular infiltration was reduced in the genipin group. We conclude that genipin is the most efficient and best tolerated cross-linking agent to attenuate inflammation and to improve the integration of esophageal scaffolds into its surrounding tissue after implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3312382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33123822012-04-13 Xenogenic Esophagus Scaffolds Fixed with Several Agents: Comparative In Vivo Study of Rejection and Inflammation Koch, Holger Graneist, Cora Emmrich, Frank Till, Holger Metzger, Roman Aupperle, Heike Schierle, Katrin Sack, Ulrich Boldt, Andreas J Biomed Biotechnol Research Article Most infants with long-gap esophageal atresia receive an esophageal replacement with tissue from stomach or colon, because the native esophagus is too short for true primary repair. Tissue-engineered esophageal conducts could present an attractive alternative. In this paper, circular decellularized porcine esophageal scaffold tissues were implanted subcutaneously into Sprague-Dawley rats. Depending on scaffold cross-linking with genipin, glutaraldehyde, and carbodiimide (untreated scaffolds : positive control; bovine pericardium : gold standard), the number of infiltrating fibroblasts, lymphocytes, macrophages, giant cells, and capillaries was determined to quantify the host response after 1, 9, and 30 days. Decellularized esophagus scaffolds were shown to maintain native matrix morphology and extracellular matrix composition. Typical inflammatory reactions were observed in all implants; however, the cellular infiltration was reduced in the genipin group. We conclude that genipin is the most efficient and best tolerated cross-linking agent to attenuate inflammation and to improve the integration of esophageal scaffolds into its surrounding tissue after implantation. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3312382/ /pubmed/22505820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/948320 Text en Copyright © 2012 Holger Koch et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Koch, Holger Graneist, Cora Emmrich, Frank Till, Holger Metzger, Roman Aupperle, Heike Schierle, Katrin Sack, Ulrich Boldt, Andreas Xenogenic Esophagus Scaffolds Fixed with Several Agents: Comparative In Vivo Study of Rejection and Inflammation |
title | Xenogenic Esophagus Scaffolds Fixed with Several Agents: Comparative In Vivo Study of Rejection and Inflammation |
title_full | Xenogenic Esophagus Scaffolds Fixed with Several Agents: Comparative In Vivo Study of Rejection and Inflammation |
title_fullStr | Xenogenic Esophagus Scaffolds Fixed with Several Agents: Comparative In Vivo Study of Rejection and Inflammation |
title_full_unstemmed | Xenogenic Esophagus Scaffolds Fixed with Several Agents: Comparative In Vivo Study of Rejection and Inflammation |
title_short | Xenogenic Esophagus Scaffolds Fixed with Several Agents: Comparative In Vivo Study of Rejection and Inflammation |
title_sort | xenogenic esophagus scaffolds fixed with several agents: comparative in vivo study of rejection and inflammation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/948320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kochholger xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation AT graneistcora xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation AT emmrichfrank xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation AT tillholger xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation AT metzgerroman xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation AT aupperleheike xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation AT schierlekatrin xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation AT sackulrich xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation AT boldtandreas xenogenicesophagusscaffoldsfixedwithseveralagentscomparativeinvivostudyofrejectionandinflammation |