Cargando…
A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis
Histological image analysis methods often employ machine-learning classifiers in order to adapt to the huge variability of histological images. To train these classifiers, the user must select samples of the relevant image objects. In the field of active learning, there has been much research on sam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22811955 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.92034 |
_version_ | 1782227881239248896 |
---|---|
author | Homeyer, André Schenk, Andrea Dahmen, Uta Dirsch, Olaf Huang, Hai Hahn, Horst K. |
author_facet | Homeyer, André Schenk, Andrea Dahmen, Uta Dirsch, Olaf Huang, Hai Hahn, Horst K. |
author_sort | Homeyer, André |
collection | PubMed |
description | Histological image analysis methods often employ machine-learning classifiers in order to adapt to the huge variability of histological images. To train these classifiers, the user must select samples of the relevant image objects. In the field of active learning, there has been much research on sampling strategies that exploit the uncertainty of the current classification in order to guide the user to maximally informative samples. Although these approaches have the potential to reduce the training effort and increase the classification accuracy, they are very rarely employed in practice. In this paper, we investigate the practical value of uncertainty sampling in the context of histological image analysis. To obtain practically meaningful results, we have devised an evaluation algorithm that simulates the way a human interacts with a user interface. The results show that uncertainty sampling outperforms common random or error sampling strategies by achieving more accurate classification results with a lower number of training images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3312717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33127172012-07-18 A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis Homeyer, André Schenk, Andrea Dahmen, Uta Dirsch, Olaf Huang, Hai Hahn, Horst K. J Pathol Inform Symposium - Original Research Histological image analysis methods often employ machine-learning classifiers in order to adapt to the huge variability of histological images. To train these classifiers, the user must select samples of the relevant image objects. In the field of active learning, there has been much research on sampling strategies that exploit the uncertainty of the current classification in order to guide the user to maximally informative samples. Although these approaches have the potential to reduce the training effort and increase the classification accuracy, they are very rarely employed in practice. In this paper, we investigate the practical value of uncertainty sampling in the context of histological image analysis. To obtain practically meaningful results, we have devised an evaluation algorithm that simulates the way a human interacts with a user interface. The results show that uncertainty sampling outperforms common random or error sampling strategies by achieving more accurate classification results with a lower number of training images. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3312717/ /pubmed/22811955 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.92034 Text en Copyright: © 2011 Homeyer A. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium - Original Research Homeyer, André Schenk, Andrea Dahmen, Uta Dirsch, Olaf Huang, Hai Hahn, Horst K. A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis |
title | A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis |
title_full | A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis |
title_fullStr | A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis |
title_short | A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis |
title_sort | comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis |
topic | Symposium - Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22811955 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.92034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT homeyerandre acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT schenkandrea acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT dahmenuta acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT dirscholaf acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT huanghai acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT hahnhorstk acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT homeyerandre comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT schenkandrea comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT dahmenuta comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT dirscholaf comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT huanghai comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis AT hahnhorstk comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis |