Cargando…

A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis

Histological image analysis methods often employ machine-learning classifiers in order to adapt to the huge variability of histological images. To train these classifiers, the user must select samples of the relevant image objects. In the field of active learning, there has been much research on sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Homeyer, André, Schenk, Andrea, Dahmen, Uta, Dirsch, Olaf, Huang, Hai, Hahn, Horst K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22811955
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.92034
_version_ 1782227881239248896
author Homeyer, André
Schenk, Andrea
Dahmen, Uta
Dirsch, Olaf
Huang, Hai
Hahn, Horst K.
author_facet Homeyer, André
Schenk, Andrea
Dahmen, Uta
Dirsch, Olaf
Huang, Hai
Hahn, Horst K.
author_sort Homeyer, André
collection PubMed
description Histological image analysis methods often employ machine-learning classifiers in order to adapt to the huge variability of histological images. To train these classifiers, the user must select samples of the relevant image objects. In the field of active learning, there has been much research on sampling strategies that exploit the uncertainty of the current classification in order to guide the user to maximally informative samples. Although these approaches have the potential to reduce the training effort and increase the classification accuracy, they are very rarely employed in practice. In this paper, we investigate the practical value of uncertainty sampling in the context of histological image analysis. To obtain practically meaningful results, we have devised an evaluation algorithm that simulates the way a human interacts with a user interface. The results show that uncertainty sampling outperforms common random or error sampling strategies by achieving more accurate classification results with a lower number of training images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3312717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33127172012-07-18 A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis Homeyer, André Schenk, Andrea Dahmen, Uta Dirsch, Olaf Huang, Hai Hahn, Horst K. J Pathol Inform Symposium - Original Research Histological image analysis methods often employ machine-learning classifiers in order to adapt to the huge variability of histological images. To train these classifiers, the user must select samples of the relevant image objects. In the field of active learning, there has been much research on sampling strategies that exploit the uncertainty of the current classification in order to guide the user to maximally informative samples. Although these approaches have the potential to reduce the training effort and increase the classification accuracy, they are very rarely employed in practice. In this paper, we investigate the practical value of uncertainty sampling in the context of histological image analysis. To obtain practically meaningful results, we have devised an evaluation algorithm that simulates the way a human interacts with a user interface. The results show that uncertainty sampling outperforms common random or error sampling strategies by achieving more accurate classification results with a lower number of training images. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3312717/ /pubmed/22811955 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.92034 Text en Copyright: © 2011 Homeyer A. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Symposium - Original Research
Homeyer, André
Schenk, Andrea
Dahmen, Uta
Dirsch, Olaf
Huang, Hai
Hahn, Horst K.
A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis
title A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis
title_full A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis
title_short A comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis
title_sort comparison of sampling strategies for histological image analysis
topic Symposium - Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22811955
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.92034
work_keys_str_mv AT homeyerandre acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT schenkandrea acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT dahmenuta acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT dirscholaf acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT huanghai acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT hahnhorstk acomparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT homeyerandre comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT schenkandrea comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT dahmenuta comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT dirscholaf comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT huanghai comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis
AT hahnhorstk comparisonofsamplingstrategiesforhistologicalimageanalysis