Cargando…

Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Objectives To determine whether trials of physical activity promotion based in primary care show sustained effects on physical activity or fitness in sedentary adults, and whether exercise referral interventions are more effective than other interventions. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orrow, Gillian, Kinmonth, Ann-Louise, Sanderson, Simon, Sutton, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22451477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1389
_version_ 1782227886801944576
author Orrow, Gillian
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
Sanderson, Simon
Sutton, Stephen
author_facet Orrow, Gillian
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
Sanderson, Simon
Sutton, Stephen
author_sort Orrow, Gillian
collection PubMed
description Objectives To determine whether trials of physical activity promotion based in primary care show sustained effects on physical activity or fitness in sedentary adults, and whether exercise referral interventions are more effective than other interventions. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists. Review methods Review of randomised controlled trials of physical activity promotion in sedentary adults recruited in primary care, with minimum follow-up of 12 months, reporting physical activity or fitness (or both) as outcomes, and using intention to treat analyses. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, appraised risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model. Results We included 15 trials (n=8745). Most interventions took place in primary care, included health professionals in delivery, and involved advice or counselling given face to face or by phone (or both) on multiple occasions. Only three trials investigated exercise referral. In 13 trials presenting self reported physical activity, we saw small to medium positive intervention effects at 12 months (odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.73; standardised mean difference 0.25, 0.11 to 0.38). The number needed to treat with an intervention for one additional sedentary adult to meet internationally recommended levels of activity at 12 months was 12 (7 to 33). In four trials reporting cardiorespiratory fitness, a medium positive effect at 12 months was non-significant (standardised mean difference 0.51, −0.18 to 1.20). Three trials of exercise referral found small non-significant effects on self reported physical activity at 12 months (odds ratio 1.38; 0.98 to 1.95; standardised mean difference 0.20, −0.21 to 0.61). Conclusions Promotion of physical activity to sedentary adults recruited in primary care significantly increases physical activity levels at 12 months, as measured by self report. We found insufficient evidence to recommend exercise referral schemes over advice or counselling interventions. Primary care commissioners should consider these findings while awaiting further trial evaluation of exercise referral schemes and other primary care interventions, with longer follow-up and use of objective measures of outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3312793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33127932012-03-28 Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Orrow, Gillian Kinmonth, Ann-Louise Sanderson, Simon Sutton, Stephen BMJ Research Objectives To determine whether trials of physical activity promotion based in primary care show sustained effects on physical activity or fitness in sedentary adults, and whether exercise referral interventions are more effective than other interventions. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists. Review methods Review of randomised controlled trials of physical activity promotion in sedentary adults recruited in primary care, with minimum follow-up of 12 months, reporting physical activity or fitness (or both) as outcomes, and using intention to treat analyses. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, appraised risk of bias, and extracted data. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model. Results We included 15 trials (n=8745). Most interventions took place in primary care, included health professionals in delivery, and involved advice or counselling given face to face or by phone (or both) on multiple occasions. Only three trials investigated exercise referral. In 13 trials presenting self reported physical activity, we saw small to medium positive intervention effects at 12 months (odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.73; standardised mean difference 0.25, 0.11 to 0.38). The number needed to treat with an intervention for one additional sedentary adult to meet internationally recommended levels of activity at 12 months was 12 (7 to 33). In four trials reporting cardiorespiratory fitness, a medium positive effect at 12 months was non-significant (standardised mean difference 0.51, −0.18 to 1.20). Three trials of exercise referral found small non-significant effects on self reported physical activity at 12 months (odds ratio 1.38; 0.98 to 1.95; standardised mean difference 0.20, −0.21 to 0.61). Conclusions Promotion of physical activity to sedentary adults recruited in primary care significantly increases physical activity levels at 12 months, as measured by self report. We found insufficient evidence to recommend exercise referral schemes over advice or counselling interventions. Primary care commissioners should consider these findings while awaiting further trial evaluation of exercise referral schemes and other primary care interventions, with longer follow-up and use of objective measures of outcome. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3312793/ /pubmed/22451477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1389 Text en © Orrow et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Orrow, Gillian
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
Sanderson, Simon
Sutton, Stephen
Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22451477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1389
work_keys_str_mv AT orrowgillian effectivenessofphysicalactivitypromotionbasedinprimarycaresystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT kinmonthannlouise effectivenessofphysicalactivitypromotionbasedinprimarycaresystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT sandersonsimon effectivenessofphysicalactivitypromotionbasedinprimarycaresystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT suttonstephen effectivenessofphysicalactivitypromotionbasedinprimarycaresystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials