Cargando…

The influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mCD14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes

BACKGROUND: Membrane-CD14 (mCD14) is expressed on the surface of monocytes, macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes (PMN). mCD14 acts as a co-receptor along with Toll like receptor 4 (TLR 4) and MD-2 for the detection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). However, studies using different samp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibeagha-Awemu, Eveline M, Ibeagha, Aloysius E, Zhao, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22333045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-93
_version_ 1782227891216449536
author Ibeagha-Awemu, Eveline M
Ibeagha, Aloysius E
Zhao, Xin
author_facet Ibeagha-Awemu, Eveline M
Ibeagha, Aloysius E
Zhao, Xin
author_sort Ibeagha-Awemu, Eveline M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Membrane-CD14 (mCD14) is expressed on the surface of monocytes, macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes (PMN). mCD14 acts as a co-receptor along with Toll like receptor 4 (TLR 4) and MD-2 for the detection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). However, studies using different sample preparation methods and anticoagulants have reported different levels of mCD14 on the surface of monocytes and neutrophils. In this study, the influence of various anticoagulants and processing methods on measurement of mCD14 on monocytes and neutrophils was examined. RESULTS: Whole blood samples were collected in vacutainer tubes containing either sodium heparin (HEPARIN), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or sodium citrate (CITRATE). mCD14 on neutrophils and monocytes in whole blood samples or isolated cells was measured by the method of flow cytometry using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled monoclonal antibody. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the mean channel fluorescence intensity (MFI) of mCD14 on neutrophils in whole blood samples anticoagulated with HEPARIN (MFI = 64.77) in comparison with those in whole blood samples anticoagulated with either EDTA (MFI = 38.25) or CITRATE (MFI = 43.7). The MFI of mCD14 on monocytes in whole blood samples anticoagulted with HEPARIN (MFI = 206.90) was significantly higher than the MFI in whole blood samples anticoagulated with EDTA (MFI = 149.37) but similar to that with CITRATE (MFI = 162.55). There was no significant difference in the percentage of whole blood neutrophils or monocytes expressing mCD14 irrespective of type of anticoagulant used. However, MFI of mCD14 on monocytes was about 3.2-folds (HEPARIN), 3.9-folds (EDTA) or 3.7 folds (CITRATE) higher than those on neutrophils. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in mCD14 levels between unprocessed whole blood monocytes and monocytes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell preparation. Conversely, a highly significant difference was observed in mCD14 between unprocessed whole blood neutrophils and isolated neutrophils (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: From these results, it is suggested that sodium heparin should be the preferred anticoagulant for use in the reliable quantification of the surface expression of mCD14. Furthermore, measurement of mCD14 is best carried out in whole blood samples, both for neutrophils and monocytes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3312831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33128312012-04-02 The influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mCD14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes Ibeagha-Awemu, Eveline M Ibeagha, Aloysius E Zhao, Xin BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Membrane-CD14 (mCD14) is expressed on the surface of monocytes, macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes (PMN). mCD14 acts as a co-receptor along with Toll like receptor 4 (TLR 4) and MD-2 for the detection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). However, studies using different sample preparation methods and anticoagulants have reported different levels of mCD14 on the surface of monocytes and neutrophils. In this study, the influence of various anticoagulants and processing methods on measurement of mCD14 on monocytes and neutrophils was examined. RESULTS: Whole blood samples were collected in vacutainer tubes containing either sodium heparin (HEPARIN), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or sodium citrate (CITRATE). mCD14 on neutrophils and monocytes in whole blood samples or isolated cells was measured by the method of flow cytometry using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled monoclonal antibody. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the mean channel fluorescence intensity (MFI) of mCD14 on neutrophils in whole blood samples anticoagulated with HEPARIN (MFI = 64.77) in comparison with those in whole blood samples anticoagulated with either EDTA (MFI = 38.25) or CITRATE (MFI = 43.7). The MFI of mCD14 on monocytes in whole blood samples anticoagulted with HEPARIN (MFI = 206.90) was significantly higher than the MFI in whole blood samples anticoagulated with EDTA (MFI = 149.37) but similar to that with CITRATE (MFI = 162.55). There was no significant difference in the percentage of whole blood neutrophils or monocytes expressing mCD14 irrespective of type of anticoagulant used. However, MFI of mCD14 on monocytes was about 3.2-folds (HEPARIN), 3.9-folds (EDTA) or 3.7 folds (CITRATE) higher than those on neutrophils. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in mCD14 levels between unprocessed whole blood monocytes and monocytes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell preparation. Conversely, a highly significant difference was observed in mCD14 between unprocessed whole blood neutrophils and isolated neutrophils (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: From these results, it is suggested that sodium heparin should be the preferred anticoagulant for use in the reliable quantification of the surface expression of mCD14. Furthermore, measurement of mCD14 is best carried out in whole blood samples, both for neutrophils and monocytes. BioMed Central 2012-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3312831/ /pubmed/22333045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-93 Text en Copyright ©2012 Zhao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ibeagha-Awemu, Eveline M
Ibeagha, Aloysius E
Zhao, Xin
The influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mCD14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes
title The influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mCD14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes
title_full The influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mCD14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes
title_fullStr The influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mCD14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes
title_full_unstemmed The influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mCD14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes
title_short The influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mCD14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes
title_sort influence of different anticoagulants and sample preparation methods on measurement of mcd14 on bovine monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22333045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-93
work_keys_str_mv AT ibeaghaawemuevelinem theinfluenceofdifferentanticoagulantsandsamplepreparationmethodsonmeasurementofmcd14onbovinemonocytesandpolymorphonuclearneutrophilleukocytes
AT ibeaghaaloysiuse theinfluenceofdifferentanticoagulantsandsamplepreparationmethodsonmeasurementofmcd14onbovinemonocytesandpolymorphonuclearneutrophilleukocytes
AT zhaoxin theinfluenceofdifferentanticoagulantsandsamplepreparationmethodsonmeasurementofmcd14onbovinemonocytesandpolymorphonuclearneutrophilleukocytes
AT ibeaghaawemuevelinem influenceofdifferentanticoagulantsandsamplepreparationmethodsonmeasurementofmcd14onbovinemonocytesandpolymorphonuclearneutrophilleukocytes
AT ibeaghaaloysiuse influenceofdifferentanticoagulantsandsamplepreparationmethodsonmeasurementofmcd14onbovinemonocytesandpolymorphonuclearneutrophilleukocytes
AT zhaoxin influenceofdifferentanticoagulantsandsamplepreparationmethodsonmeasurementofmcd14onbovinemonocytesandpolymorphonuclearneutrophilleukocytes