Cargando…
Conducting Online Expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study
BACKGROUND: This paper has two goals. First, we explore the feasibility of conducting online expert panels to facilitate consensus finding among a large number of geographically distributed stakeholders. Second, we test the replicability of panel findings across four panels of different size. METHOD...
Autores principales: | Khodyakov, Dmitry, Hempel, Susanne, Rubenstein, Lisa, Shekelle, Paul, Foy, Robbie, Salem-Schatz, Susanne, O'Neill, Sean, Danz, Margie, Dalal, Siddhartha |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3313865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22196011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-174 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How can we recognize continuous quality improvement?
por: Rubenstein, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) for critical appraisal: advancing the science of quality improvement
por: Rubenstein, Lisa V, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications
por: Hempel, Susanne, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Identifying continuous quality improvement publications: what makes an improvement intervention ‘CQI’?
por: O'Neill, Sean M, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Identifying quality improvement intervention publications - A comparison of electronic search strategies
por: Hempel, Susanne, et al.
Publicado: (2011)