Cargando…

Heavy Tailed Distributions of Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of complex interventions commonly find heterogeneity of effect sizes among similar interventions which cannot be explained. Commentators have suggested that complex interventions should be viewed as interventions in complex systems. We hypothesised that if this is the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Burton, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3313970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034222
_version_ 1782228063321325568
author Burton, Christopher
author_facet Burton, Christopher
author_sort Burton, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of complex interventions commonly find heterogeneity of effect sizes among similar interventions which cannot be explained. Commentators have suggested that complex interventions should be viewed as interventions in complex systems. We hypothesised that if this is the case, the distribution of effect sizes from complex interventions should be heavy tailed, as in other complex systems. Thus, apparent heterogeneity may be a feature of the complex systems in which such interventions operate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We specified three levels of complexity and identified systematic reviews which reported effect sizes of healthcare interventions at two of these levels (interventions to change professional practice and personal interventions to help smoking cessation). These were compared with each other and with simulated data representing the lowest level of complexity. Effect size data were rescaled across reviews at each level using log-normal parameters and pooled. Distributions were plotted and fitted against the inverse power law (Pareto) and stretched exponential (Weibull) distributions, heavy tailed distributions which are commonly reported in the literature, using maximum likelihood fitting. The dataset included 155 studies of interventions to change practice and 98 studies of helping smoking cessation. Both distributions showed a heavy tailed distribution which fitted best to the inverse power law for practice interventions (exponent = 3.9, loglikelihood = −35.3) and to the stretched exponential for smoking cessation (loglikelihood = −75.2). Bootstrap sensitivity analysis to adjust for possible publication bias against weak results did not diminish the goodness of fit. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The distribution of effect sizes from complex interventions includes heavy tails as typically seen in both theoretical and empirical complex systems. This is in keeping with the idea of complex interventions as interventions in complex systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3313970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33139702012-04-04 Heavy Tailed Distributions of Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions Burton, Christopher PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of complex interventions commonly find heterogeneity of effect sizes among similar interventions which cannot be explained. Commentators have suggested that complex interventions should be viewed as interventions in complex systems. We hypothesised that if this is the case, the distribution of effect sizes from complex interventions should be heavy tailed, as in other complex systems. Thus, apparent heterogeneity may be a feature of the complex systems in which such interventions operate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We specified three levels of complexity and identified systematic reviews which reported effect sizes of healthcare interventions at two of these levels (interventions to change professional practice and personal interventions to help smoking cessation). These were compared with each other and with simulated data representing the lowest level of complexity. Effect size data were rescaled across reviews at each level using log-normal parameters and pooled. Distributions were plotted and fitted against the inverse power law (Pareto) and stretched exponential (Weibull) distributions, heavy tailed distributions which are commonly reported in the literature, using maximum likelihood fitting. The dataset included 155 studies of interventions to change practice and 98 studies of helping smoking cessation. Both distributions showed a heavy tailed distribution which fitted best to the inverse power law for practice interventions (exponent = 3.9, loglikelihood = −35.3) and to the stretched exponential for smoking cessation (loglikelihood = −75.2). Bootstrap sensitivity analysis to adjust for possible publication bias against weak results did not diminish the goodness of fit. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The distribution of effect sizes from complex interventions includes heavy tails as typically seen in both theoretical and empirical complex systems. This is in keeping with the idea of complex interventions as interventions in complex systems. Public Library of Science 2012-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3313970/ /pubmed/22479569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034222 Text en Christopher Burton. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Burton, Christopher
Heavy Tailed Distributions of Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions
title Heavy Tailed Distributions of Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions
title_full Heavy Tailed Distributions of Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions
title_fullStr Heavy Tailed Distributions of Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Heavy Tailed Distributions of Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions
title_short Heavy Tailed Distributions of Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews of Complex Interventions
title_sort heavy tailed distributions of effect sizes in systematic reviews of complex interventions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3313970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034222
work_keys_str_mv AT burtonchristopher heavytaileddistributionsofeffectsizesinsystematicreviewsofcomplexinterventions