Cargando…

Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate possible variations in maxillary and mandibular bone texture of normal population using the fractal analysis, particles count, and area fraction in intraoral radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Periapical radiographs of patients who had full mouth intrao...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amer, Maha Eshak, Heo, Min-Suk, Brooks, Sharon L, Benavides, Erika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3314838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22474642
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.5
_version_ 1782228149196554240
author Amer, Maha Eshak
Heo, Min-Suk
Brooks, Sharon L
Benavides, Erika
author_facet Amer, Maha Eshak
Heo, Min-Suk
Brooks, Sharon L
Benavides, Erika
author_sort Amer, Maha Eshak
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate possible variations in maxillary and mandibular bone texture of normal population using the fractal analysis, particles count, and area fraction in intraoral radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Periapical radiographs of patients who had full mouth intraoral radiographs were collected. Regions of interest (100×100 pixels) were located between the teeth of the maxillary anterior, premolar, and molar area, as well as the mandibular anterior, premolar, and molar areas. The fractal dimension (FD) was calculated by using the box counting method. The particle count (PC) and area fraction (AF) analyses were also performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the FD values among the different groups of age, gender, upper, and lower jaws. The mean FD value was 1.49±0.01. The mean PC ranged from 44 to 54, and the mean AF ranged from 10.92 to 11.85. The values of FD, PC, and AF were significantly correlated with each other except for the upper molar area. CONCLUSION: According to the results, patients with normal trabecular pattern showed a FD of approximately 1.5. Based on these results, further investigation would be recommended if the FD value of patient significantly differenct from this number, since the alteration of this value indicates microstructural modification of trabecular pattern of the jaws. Additionally, with periapical radiographs, simple and cost-effective, PC and AF could be used to assess the deviation from the normal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3314838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33148382012-04-03 Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses Amer, Maha Eshak Heo, Min-Suk Brooks, Sharon L Benavides, Erika Imaging Sci Dent Original Article PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate possible variations in maxillary and mandibular bone texture of normal population using the fractal analysis, particles count, and area fraction in intraoral radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Periapical radiographs of patients who had full mouth intraoral radiographs were collected. Regions of interest (100×100 pixels) were located between the teeth of the maxillary anterior, premolar, and molar area, as well as the mandibular anterior, premolar, and molar areas. The fractal dimension (FD) was calculated by using the box counting method. The particle count (PC) and area fraction (AF) analyses were also performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the FD values among the different groups of age, gender, upper, and lower jaws. The mean FD value was 1.49±0.01. The mean PC ranged from 44 to 54, and the mean AF ranged from 10.92 to 11.85. The values of FD, PC, and AF were significantly correlated with each other except for the upper molar area. CONCLUSION: According to the results, patients with normal trabecular pattern showed a FD of approximately 1.5. Based on these results, further investigation would be recommended if the FD value of patient significantly differenct from this number, since the alteration of this value indicates microstructural modification of trabecular pattern of the jaws. Additionally, with periapical radiographs, simple and cost-effective, PC and AF could be used to assess the deviation from the normal. Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2012-03 2012-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3314838/ /pubmed/22474642 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.5 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amer, Maha Eshak
Heo, Min-Suk
Brooks, Sharon L
Benavides, Erika
Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses
title Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses
title_full Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses
title_fullStr Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses
title_short Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses
title_sort anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3314838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22474642
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.5
work_keys_str_mv AT amermahaeshak anatomicalvariationsoftrabecularbonestructureinintraoralradiographsusingfractalandparticlescountanalyses
AT heominsuk anatomicalvariationsoftrabecularbonestructureinintraoralradiographsusingfractalandparticlescountanalyses
AT brookssharonl anatomicalvariationsoftrabecularbonestructureinintraoralradiographsusingfractalandparticlescountanalyses
AT benavideserika anatomicalvariationsoftrabecularbonestructureinintraoralradiographsusingfractalandparticlescountanalyses