Cargando…
From baconian to popperian neuroscience
The development of neuroscience over the past 50 years has some similarities with the development of physics in the 17th century. Towards the beginning of that century, Bacon promoted the systematic gathering of experimental data and the induction of scientific truth; towards the end, Newton express...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22330680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2042-1001-2-2 |
_version_ | 1782228221820928000 |
---|---|
author | Gamez, David |
author_facet | Gamez, David |
author_sort | Gamez, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of neuroscience over the past 50 years has some similarities with the development of physics in the 17th century. Towards the beginning of that century, Bacon promoted the systematic gathering of experimental data and the induction of scientific truth; towards the end, Newton expressed his principles of gravitation and motion in a concise set of mathematical equations that made precise falsifiable predictions. This paper expresses the opinion that as neuroscience comes of age, it needs to move away from amassing large quantities of data about the brain, and adopt a popperian model in which theories are developed that can make strong falsifiable predictions and guide future experimental work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3315404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33154042012-03-30 From baconian to popperian neuroscience Gamez, David Neural Syst Circuits Opinion The development of neuroscience over the past 50 years has some similarities with the development of physics in the 17th century. Towards the beginning of that century, Bacon promoted the systematic gathering of experimental data and the induction of scientific truth; towards the end, Newton expressed his principles of gravitation and motion in a concise set of mathematical equations that made precise falsifiable predictions. This paper expresses the opinion that as neuroscience comes of age, it needs to move away from amassing large quantities of data about the brain, and adopt a popperian model in which theories are developed that can make strong falsifiable predictions and guide future experimental work. BioMed Central 2012-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3315404/ /pubmed/22330680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2042-1001-2-2 Text en Copyright ©2012 Gamez; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Gamez, David From baconian to popperian neuroscience |
title | From baconian to popperian neuroscience |
title_full | From baconian to popperian neuroscience |
title_fullStr | From baconian to popperian neuroscience |
title_full_unstemmed | From baconian to popperian neuroscience |
title_short | From baconian to popperian neuroscience |
title_sort | from baconian to popperian neuroscience |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22330680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2042-1001-2-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gamezdavid frombaconiantopopperianneuroscience |