Cargando…

From baconian to popperian neuroscience

The development of neuroscience over the past 50 years has some similarities with the development of physics in the 17th century. Towards the beginning of that century, Bacon promoted the systematic gathering of experimental data and the induction of scientific truth; towards the end, Newton express...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gamez, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22330680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2042-1001-2-2
_version_ 1782228221820928000
author Gamez, David
author_facet Gamez, David
author_sort Gamez, David
collection PubMed
description The development of neuroscience over the past 50 years has some similarities with the development of physics in the 17th century. Towards the beginning of that century, Bacon promoted the systematic gathering of experimental data and the induction of scientific truth; towards the end, Newton expressed his principles of gravitation and motion in a concise set of mathematical equations that made precise falsifiable predictions. This paper expresses the opinion that as neuroscience comes of age, it needs to move away from amassing large quantities of data about the brain, and adopt a popperian model in which theories are developed that can make strong falsifiable predictions and guide future experimental work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3315404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33154042012-03-30 From baconian to popperian neuroscience Gamez, David Neural Syst Circuits Opinion The development of neuroscience over the past 50 years has some similarities with the development of physics in the 17th century. Towards the beginning of that century, Bacon promoted the systematic gathering of experimental data and the induction of scientific truth; towards the end, Newton expressed his principles of gravitation and motion in a concise set of mathematical equations that made precise falsifiable predictions. This paper expresses the opinion that as neuroscience comes of age, it needs to move away from amassing large quantities of data about the brain, and adopt a popperian model in which theories are developed that can make strong falsifiable predictions and guide future experimental work. BioMed Central 2012-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3315404/ /pubmed/22330680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2042-1001-2-2 Text en Copyright ©2012 Gamez; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion
Gamez, David
From baconian to popperian neuroscience
title From baconian to popperian neuroscience
title_full From baconian to popperian neuroscience
title_fullStr From baconian to popperian neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed From baconian to popperian neuroscience
title_short From baconian to popperian neuroscience
title_sort from baconian to popperian neuroscience
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22330680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2042-1001-2-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gamezdavid frombaconiantopopperianneuroscience