Cargando…
Toward systematic integration between self-determination theory and motivational interviewing as examples of top-down and bottom-up intervention development: autonomy or volition as a fundamental theoretical principle
Clinical interventions can be developed through two distinct pathways. In the first, which we call top-down, a well-articulated theory drives the development of the intervention, whereas in the case of a bottom-up approach, clinical experience, more so than a dedicated theoretical perspective, drive...
Autores principales: | Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Williams, Geoffrey C, Resnicow, Ken |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22385828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-23 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Motivational Interviewing: moving from why to how with autonomy support
por: Resnicow, Ken, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
A Qualitative Study of Perspectives of Black Women on Autonomy and Motivational Interviewing
por: Gregory, Emily F., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Motivation, intention, and volition
Publicado: (1987) -
Combining ‘Bottom-Up’ and ‘Top-Down’ Methods to Assess Ethnic Difference in Clearance: Bitopertin as an Example
por: Feng, Sheng, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Bottom-Up and Top-Down Graph Pooling
por: Yang, Jia-Qi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)