Cargando…
Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts – A Critical Discussion
A central challenge for any theory of concept learning comes from Fodor’s argument against the learning of concepts, which lies at the basis of contemporary computationalist accounts of the mind. Robert Goldstone and his colleagues propose a theory of perceptual learning that attempts to overcome Fo...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00093 |
_version_ | 1782228296765800448 |
---|---|
author | Stöckle-Schobel, Richard |
author_facet | Stöckle-Schobel, Richard |
author_sort | Stöckle-Schobel, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | A central challenge for any theory of concept learning comes from Fodor’s argument against the learning of concepts, which lies at the basis of contemporary computationalist accounts of the mind. Robert Goldstone and his colleagues propose a theory of perceptual learning that attempts to overcome Fodor’s challenge. Its main component is the addition of a cognitive device at the interface of perception and conception, which slowly builds “cognitive symbols” out of perceptual stimuli. Two main mechanisms of concept creation are unitization and differentiation. In this paper, I will present and examine their theory, and will show that two problems hinder this reply to Fodor’s challenge from being a successful answer to the challenge. To amend the theory, I will argue that one would need to say more about the input systems to unitization and differentiation, and be clearer on the representational format that they are able to operate upon. Until these issues have been addressed, the proposal does not deploy its full potential to threaten a Fodorian position. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3315842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33158422012-04-04 Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts – A Critical Discussion Stöckle-Schobel, Richard Front Psychol Psychology A central challenge for any theory of concept learning comes from Fodor’s argument against the learning of concepts, which lies at the basis of contemporary computationalist accounts of the mind. Robert Goldstone and his colleagues propose a theory of perceptual learning that attempts to overcome Fodor’s challenge. Its main component is the addition of a cognitive device at the interface of perception and conception, which slowly builds “cognitive symbols” out of perceptual stimuli. Two main mechanisms of concept creation are unitization and differentiation. In this paper, I will present and examine their theory, and will show that two problems hinder this reply to Fodor’s challenge from being a successful answer to the challenge. To amend the theory, I will argue that one would need to say more about the input systems to unitization and differentiation, and be clearer on the representational format that they are able to operate upon. Until these issues have been addressed, the proposal does not deploy its full potential to threaten a Fodorian position. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3315842/ /pubmed/22479256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00093 Text en Copyright © 2012 Stöckle-Schobel. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Stöckle-Schobel, Richard Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts – A Critical Discussion |
title | Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts – A Critical Discussion |
title_full | Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts – A Critical Discussion |
title_fullStr | Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts – A Critical Discussion |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts – A Critical Discussion |
title_short | Perceptual Learning and Feature-Based Approaches to Concepts – A Critical Discussion |
title_sort | perceptual learning and feature-based approaches to concepts – a critical discussion |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stockleschobelrichard perceptuallearningandfeaturebasedapproachestoconceptsacriticaldiscussion |