Cargando…
Losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle
The fibers in a skeletal muscle are divided into groups called “muscle units” whereby each muscle unit is innervated by a single neuron. It was found that neurons with low activation thresholds have smaller muscle units than neurons with higher activation thresholds. This results in a fixed recruitm...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00016 |
_version_ | 1782228297473589248 |
---|---|
author | Nowik, Irit Zamir, Shmuel Segev, Idan |
author_facet | Nowik, Irit Zamir, Shmuel Segev, Idan |
author_sort | Nowik, Irit |
collection | PubMed |
description | The fibers in a skeletal muscle are divided into groups called “muscle units” whereby each muscle unit is innervated by a single neuron. It was found that neurons with low activation thresholds have smaller muscle units than neurons with higher activation thresholds. This results in a fixed recruitment order of muscle units, from smallest to largest, called the “size principle.” It is thought that the size principle results from a competitive process—taking place after birth—between the neurons innervating the muscle. The underlying mechanism of the competition was not understood. Moreover, the results in the majority of experiments that manipulated the activity during the competition period seemed to contradict the size principle. Experiments at the isolated muscle fibers showed that the competition is governed by a Hebbian-like rule, whereby neurons with low activation thresholds have a competitive advantage at any single muscle fiber. Thus neurons with low activation thresholds are expected to have larger muscle units in contradiction to what is seen empirically. This state of affairs was termed “paradoxical.” In the present study we developed a new game theoretic framework to analyze such competitive biological processes. In this game, neurons are the players competing to innervate a maximal number of muscle fibers. We showed that in order to innervate more muscle fibers, it is advantageous to win (as the neurons with higher activation thresholds do) later competitions. This both explains the size principle and resolves the seemingly paradoxical experimental data. Our model establishes that the competition at each muscle fiber may indeed be Hebbian and that the size principle still emerges from these competitions as an overall property of the system. Thus, the less active neurons “lose the battle but win the war.” Our model provides experimentally testable predictions. The new game-theoretic approach may be applied to competitions in other biological systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3315845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33158452012-04-04 Losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle Nowik, Irit Zamir, Shmuel Segev, Idan Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience The fibers in a skeletal muscle are divided into groups called “muscle units” whereby each muscle unit is innervated by a single neuron. It was found that neurons with low activation thresholds have smaller muscle units than neurons with higher activation thresholds. This results in a fixed recruitment order of muscle units, from smallest to largest, called the “size principle.” It is thought that the size principle results from a competitive process—taking place after birth—between the neurons innervating the muscle. The underlying mechanism of the competition was not understood. Moreover, the results in the majority of experiments that manipulated the activity during the competition period seemed to contradict the size principle. Experiments at the isolated muscle fibers showed that the competition is governed by a Hebbian-like rule, whereby neurons with low activation thresholds have a competitive advantage at any single muscle fiber. Thus neurons with low activation thresholds are expected to have larger muscle units in contradiction to what is seen empirically. This state of affairs was termed “paradoxical.” In the present study we developed a new game theoretic framework to analyze such competitive biological processes. In this game, neurons are the players competing to innervate a maximal number of muscle fibers. We showed that in order to innervate more muscle fibers, it is advantageous to win (as the neurons with higher activation thresholds do) later competitions. This both explains the size principle and resolves the seemingly paradoxical experimental data. Our model establishes that the competition at each muscle fiber may indeed be Hebbian and that the size principle still emerges from these competitions as an overall property of the system. Thus, the less active neurons “lose the battle but win the war.” Our model provides experimentally testable predictions. The new game-theoretic approach may be applied to competitions in other biological systems. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3315845/ /pubmed/22479244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00016 Text en Copyright © 2012 Nowik, Zamir and Segev. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Nowik, Irit Zamir, Shmuel Segev, Idan Losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle |
title | Losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle |
title_full | Losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle |
title_fullStr | Losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle |
title_full_unstemmed | Losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle |
title_short | Losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle |
title_sort | losing the battle but winning the war: game theoretic analysis of the competition between motoneurons innervating a skeletal muscle |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nowikirit losingthebattlebutwinningthewargametheoreticanalysisofthecompetitionbetweenmotoneuronsinnervatingaskeletalmuscle AT zamirshmuel losingthebattlebutwinningthewargametheoreticanalysisofthecompetitionbetweenmotoneuronsinnervatingaskeletalmuscle AT segevidan losingthebattlebutwinningthewargametheoreticanalysisofthecompetitionbetweenmotoneuronsinnervatingaskeletalmuscle |