Cargando…

Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial

BACKGROUND: Motor imagery (MI) when combined with physiotherapy can offer functional benefits after stroke. Two MI integration strategies exist: added and embedded MI. Both approaches were compared when learning a complex motor task (MT): 'Going down, laying on the floor, and getting up again&#...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuster, Corina, Butler, Jenny, Andrews, Brian, Kischka, Udo, Ettlin, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3316146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22269834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-11
_version_ 1782228353645805568
author Schuster, Corina
Butler, Jenny
Andrews, Brian
Kischka, Udo
Ettlin, Thierry
author_facet Schuster, Corina
Butler, Jenny
Andrews, Brian
Kischka, Udo
Ettlin, Thierry
author_sort Schuster, Corina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Motor imagery (MI) when combined with physiotherapy can offer functional benefits after stroke. Two MI integration strategies exist: added and embedded MI. Both approaches were compared when learning a complex motor task (MT): 'Going down, laying on the floor, and getting up again'. METHODS: Outpatients after first stroke participated in a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with MI embedded into physiotherapy (EG1), MI added to physiotherapy (EG2), and a control group (CG). All groups participated in six physiotherapy sessions. Primary study outcome was time (sec) to perform the motor task at pre and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes: level of help needed, stages of MT-completion, independence, balance, fear of falling (FOF), MI ability. Data were collected four times: twice during one week baseline phase (BL, T0), following the two week intervention (T1), after a two week follow-up (FU). Analysis of variance was performed. RESULTS: Thirty nine outpatients were included (12 females, age: 63.4 ± 10 years; time since stroke: 3.5 ± 2 years; 29 with an ischemic event). All were able to complete the motor task using the standardised 7-step procedure and reduced FOF at T0, T1, and FU. Times to perform the MT at baseline were 44.2 ± 22s, 64.6 ± 50s, and 118.3 ± 93s for EG1 (N = 13), EG2 (N = 12), and CG (N = 14). All groups showed significant improvement in time to complete the MT (p < 0.001) and degree of help needed to perform the task: minimal assistance to supervision (CG) and independent performance (EG1+2). No between group differences were found. Only EG1 demonstrated changes in MI ability over time with the visual indicator increasing from T0 to T1 and decreasing from T1 to FU. The kinaesthetic indicator increased from T1 to FU. Patients indicated to value the MI training and continued using MI for other difficult-to-perform tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Embedded or added MI training combined with physiotherapy seem to be feasible and benefi-cial to learn the MT with emphasis on getting up independently. Based on their baseline level CG had the highest potential to improve outcomes. A patient study with 35 patients per group could give a conclusive answer of a superior MI integration strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00858910
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3316146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33161462012-04-04 Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial Schuster, Corina Butler, Jenny Andrews, Brian Kischka, Udo Ettlin, Thierry Trials Research BACKGROUND: Motor imagery (MI) when combined with physiotherapy can offer functional benefits after stroke. Two MI integration strategies exist: added and embedded MI. Both approaches were compared when learning a complex motor task (MT): 'Going down, laying on the floor, and getting up again'. METHODS: Outpatients after first stroke participated in a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with MI embedded into physiotherapy (EG1), MI added to physiotherapy (EG2), and a control group (CG). All groups participated in six physiotherapy sessions. Primary study outcome was time (sec) to perform the motor task at pre and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes: level of help needed, stages of MT-completion, independence, balance, fear of falling (FOF), MI ability. Data were collected four times: twice during one week baseline phase (BL, T0), following the two week intervention (T1), after a two week follow-up (FU). Analysis of variance was performed. RESULTS: Thirty nine outpatients were included (12 females, age: 63.4 ± 10 years; time since stroke: 3.5 ± 2 years; 29 with an ischemic event). All were able to complete the motor task using the standardised 7-step procedure and reduced FOF at T0, T1, and FU. Times to perform the MT at baseline were 44.2 ± 22s, 64.6 ± 50s, and 118.3 ± 93s for EG1 (N = 13), EG2 (N = 12), and CG (N = 14). All groups showed significant improvement in time to complete the MT (p < 0.001) and degree of help needed to perform the task: minimal assistance to supervision (CG) and independent performance (EG1+2). No between group differences were found. Only EG1 demonstrated changes in MI ability over time with the visual indicator increasing from T0 to T1 and decreasing from T1 to FU. The kinaesthetic indicator increased from T1 to FU. Patients indicated to value the MI training and continued using MI for other difficult-to-perform tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Embedded or added MI training combined with physiotherapy seem to be feasible and benefi-cial to learn the MT with emphasis on getting up independently. Based on their baseline level CG had the highest potential to improve outcomes. A patient study with 35 patients per group could give a conclusive answer of a superior MI integration strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00858910 BioMed Central 2012-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3316146/ /pubmed/22269834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-11 Text en Copyright ©2012 Schuster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Schuster, Corina
Butler, Jenny
Andrews, Brian
Kischka, Udo
Ettlin, Thierry
Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial
title Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial
title_full Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial
title_fullStr Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial
title_short Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial
title_sort comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3316146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22269834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-11
work_keys_str_mv AT schustercorina comparisonofembeddedandaddedmotorimagerytraininginpatientsafterstrokeresultsofarandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT butlerjenny comparisonofembeddedandaddedmotorimagerytraininginpatientsafterstrokeresultsofarandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT andrewsbrian comparisonofembeddedandaddedmotorimagerytraininginpatientsafterstrokeresultsofarandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT kischkaudo comparisonofembeddedandaddedmotorimagerytraininginpatientsafterstrokeresultsofarandomisedcontrolledpilottrial
AT ettlinthierry comparisonofembeddedandaddedmotorimagerytraininginpatientsafterstrokeresultsofarandomisedcontrolledpilottrial