Cargando…

Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in Korea

It is essential to rapidly and precisely diagnose rabies. In this study, we evaluated four diagnostic methods, indirect fluorescent antibody test (FAT), virus isolation (VI), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and rapid immunodiagnostic assay (RIDA), to detect rabies in animal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Dong-Kun, Shin, Eun-Kyung, Oh, Yoon-I, Lee, Kyung-Woo, Lee, Chung-San, Kim, Seo-Young, Lee, Jeong-A, Song, Jae-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Veterinary Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22437535
http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2012.13.1.43
_version_ 1782228556044042240
author Yang, Dong-Kun
Shin, Eun-Kyung
Oh, Yoon-I
Lee, Kyung-Woo
Lee, Chung-San
Kim, Seo-Young
Lee, Jeong-A
Song, Jae-Young
author_facet Yang, Dong-Kun
Shin, Eun-Kyung
Oh, Yoon-I
Lee, Kyung-Woo
Lee, Chung-San
Kim, Seo-Young
Lee, Jeong-A
Song, Jae-Young
author_sort Yang, Dong-Kun
collection PubMed
description It is essential to rapidly and precisely diagnose rabies. In this study, we evaluated four diagnostic methods, indirect fluorescent antibody test (FAT), virus isolation (VI), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and rapid immunodiagnostic assay (RIDA), to detect rabies in animal brain homogenates. Out of the 110 animal brain samples tested, 20 (18.2%) were positive for rabies according to the FAT. Compared to the FAT, the sensitivities of VI, RT-PCR, and RIDA were 100, 100, and 95%, respectively. The specificities of VI, RT-PCR and RIDA were found to be 100, 100, and 98.9%, respectively. Rabies viruses circulating in Korea were isolated and propagated in murine neuroblastoma (NG108-15) cells with titers ranging from 10(1.5) to 10(4.5) TCID(50)/mL. Although the RIDA findings did not completely coincide with results obtained from FAT, VI, and RT-PCR, RIDA appears to be a fast and reliable assay that can be used to analyze brain samples. In summary, the results from our study showed that VI, RT-PCR, and RIDA can be used as supplementary diagnostic tools for detecting rabies viruses in both laboratory and field settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3317456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Veterinary Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33174562012-04-04 Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in Korea Yang, Dong-Kun Shin, Eun-Kyung Oh, Yoon-I Lee, Kyung-Woo Lee, Chung-San Kim, Seo-Young Lee, Jeong-A Song, Jae-Young J Vet Sci Original Article It is essential to rapidly and precisely diagnose rabies. In this study, we evaluated four diagnostic methods, indirect fluorescent antibody test (FAT), virus isolation (VI), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and rapid immunodiagnostic assay (RIDA), to detect rabies in animal brain homogenates. Out of the 110 animal brain samples tested, 20 (18.2%) were positive for rabies according to the FAT. Compared to the FAT, the sensitivities of VI, RT-PCR, and RIDA were 100, 100, and 95%, respectively. The specificities of VI, RT-PCR and RIDA were found to be 100, 100, and 98.9%, respectively. Rabies viruses circulating in Korea were isolated and propagated in murine neuroblastoma (NG108-15) cells with titers ranging from 10(1.5) to 10(4.5) TCID(50)/mL. Although the RIDA findings did not completely coincide with results obtained from FAT, VI, and RT-PCR, RIDA appears to be a fast and reliable assay that can be used to analyze brain samples. In summary, the results from our study showed that VI, RT-PCR, and RIDA can be used as supplementary diagnostic tools for detecting rabies viruses in both laboratory and field settings. The Korean Society of Veterinary Science 2012-03 2012-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3317456/ /pubmed/22437535 http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2012.13.1.43 Text en © 2012 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Dong-Kun
Shin, Eun-Kyung
Oh, Yoon-I
Lee, Kyung-Woo
Lee, Chung-San
Kim, Seo-Young
Lee, Jeong-A
Song, Jae-Young
Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in Korea
title Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in Korea
title_full Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in Korea
title_fullStr Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in Korea
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in Korea
title_short Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in Korea
title_sort comparison of four diagnostic methods for detecting rabies viruses circulating in korea
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22437535
http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2012.13.1.43
work_keys_str_mv AT yangdongkun comparisonoffourdiagnosticmethodsfordetectingrabiesvirusescirculatinginkorea
AT shineunkyung comparisonoffourdiagnosticmethodsfordetectingrabiesvirusescirculatinginkorea
AT ohyooni comparisonoffourdiagnosticmethodsfordetectingrabiesvirusescirculatinginkorea
AT leekyungwoo comparisonoffourdiagnosticmethodsfordetectingrabiesvirusescirculatinginkorea
AT leechungsan comparisonoffourdiagnosticmethodsfordetectingrabiesvirusescirculatinginkorea
AT kimseoyoung comparisonoffourdiagnosticmethodsfordetectingrabiesvirusescirculatinginkorea
AT leejeonga comparisonoffourdiagnosticmethodsfordetectingrabiesvirusescirculatinginkorea
AT songjaeyoung comparisonoffourdiagnosticmethodsfordetectingrabiesvirusescirculatinginkorea