Cargando…

The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast

Binocular vision is traditionally treated as two processes: the fusion of similar images, and the interocular suppression of dissimilar images (e.g. binocular rivalry). Recent work has demonstrated that interocular suppression is phase-insensitive, whereas binocular summation occurs only when stimul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Daniel H., Wallis, Stuart A., Georgeson, Mark A., Meese, Tim S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22485185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034696
_version_ 1782228588095864832
author Baker, Daniel H.
Wallis, Stuart A.
Georgeson, Mark A.
Meese, Tim S.
author_facet Baker, Daniel H.
Wallis, Stuart A.
Georgeson, Mark A.
Meese, Tim S.
author_sort Baker, Daniel H.
collection PubMed
description Binocular vision is traditionally treated as two processes: the fusion of similar images, and the interocular suppression of dissimilar images (e.g. binocular rivalry). Recent work has demonstrated that interocular suppression is phase-insensitive, whereas binocular summation occurs only when stimuli are in phase. But how do these processes affect our perception of binocular contrast? We measured perceived contrast using a matching paradigm for a wide range of interocular phase offsets (0–180°) and matching contrasts (2–32%). Our results revealed a complex interaction between contrast and interocular phase. At low contrasts, perceived contrast reduced monotonically with increasing phase offset, by up to a factor of 1.6. At higher contrasts the pattern was non-monotonic: perceived contrast was veridical for in-phase and antiphase conditions, and monocular presentation, but increased a little at intermediate phase angles. These findings challenge a recent model in which contrast perception is phase-invariant. The results were predicted by a binocular contrast gain control model. The model involves monocular gain controls with interocular suppression from positive and negative phase channels, followed by summation across eyes and then across space. Importantly, this model—applied to conditions with vertical disparity—has only a single (zero) disparity channel and embodies both fusion and suppression processes within a single framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3317637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33176372012-04-06 The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast Baker, Daniel H. Wallis, Stuart A. Georgeson, Mark A. Meese, Tim S. PLoS One Research Article Binocular vision is traditionally treated as two processes: the fusion of similar images, and the interocular suppression of dissimilar images (e.g. binocular rivalry). Recent work has demonstrated that interocular suppression is phase-insensitive, whereas binocular summation occurs only when stimuli are in phase. But how do these processes affect our perception of binocular contrast? We measured perceived contrast using a matching paradigm for a wide range of interocular phase offsets (0–180°) and matching contrasts (2–32%). Our results revealed a complex interaction between contrast and interocular phase. At low contrasts, perceived contrast reduced monotonically with increasing phase offset, by up to a factor of 1.6. At higher contrasts the pattern was non-monotonic: perceived contrast was veridical for in-phase and antiphase conditions, and monocular presentation, but increased a little at intermediate phase angles. These findings challenge a recent model in which contrast perception is phase-invariant. The results were predicted by a binocular contrast gain control model. The model involves monocular gain controls with interocular suppression from positive and negative phase channels, followed by summation across eyes and then across space. Importantly, this model—applied to conditions with vertical disparity—has only a single (zero) disparity channel and embodies both fusion and suppression processes within a single framework. Public Library of Science 2012-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3317637/ /pubmed/22485185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034696 Text en Baker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baker, Daniel H.
Wallis, Stuart A.
Georgeson, Mark A.
Meese, Tim S.
The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast
title The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast
title_full The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast
title_fullStr The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast
title_short The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast
title_sort effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22485185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034696
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerdanielh theeffectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast
AT wallisstuarta theeffectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast
AT georgesonmarka theeffectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast
AT meesetims theeffectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast
AT bakerdanielh effectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast
AT wallisstuarta effectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast
AT georgesonmarka effectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast
AT meesetims effectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast