Cargando…
The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast
Binocular vision is traditionally treated as two processes: the fusion of similar images, and the interocular suppression of dissimilar images (e.g. binocular rivalry). Recent work has demonstrated that interocular suppression is phase-insensitive, whereas binocular summation occurs only when stimul...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22485185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034696 |
_version_ | 1782228588095864832 |
---|---|
author | Baker, Daniel H. Wallis, Stuart A. Georgeson, Mark A. Meese, Tim S. |
author_facet | Baker, Daniel H. Wallis, Stuart A. Georgeson, Mark A. Meese, Tim S. |
author_sort | Baker, Daniel H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Binocular vision is traditionally treated as two processes: the fusion of similar images, and the interocular suppression of dissimilar images (e.g. binocular rivalry). Recent work has demonstrated that interocular suppression is phase-insensitive, whereas binocular summation occurs only when stimuli are in phase. But how do these processes affect our perception of binocular contrast? We measured perceived contrast using a matching paradigm for a wide range of interocular phase offsets (0–180°) and matching contrasts (2–32%). Our results revealed a complex interaction between contrast and interocular phase. At low contrasts, perceived contrast reduced monotonically with increasing phase offset, by up to a factor of 1.6. At higher contrasts the pattern was non-monotonic: perceived contrast was veridical for in-phase and antiphase conditions, and monocular presentation, but increased a little at intermediate phase angles. These findings challenge a recent model in which contrast perception is phase-invariant. The results were predicted by a binocular contrast gain control model. The model involves monocular gain controls with interocular suppression from positive and negative phase channels, followed by summation across eyes and then across space. Importantly, this model—applied to conditions with vertical disparity—has only a single (zero) disparity channel and embodies both fusion and suppression processes within a single framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3317637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33176372012-04-06 The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast Baker, Daniel H. Wallis, Stuart A. Georgeson, Mark A. Meese, Tim S. PLoS One Research Article Binocular vision is traditionally treated as two processes: the fusion of similar images, and the interocular suppression of dissimilar images (e.g. binocular rivalry). Recent work has demonstrated that interocular suppression is phase-insensitive, whereas binocular summation occurs only when stimuli are in phase. But how do these processes affect our perception of binocular contrast? We measured perceived contrast using a matching paradigm for a wide range of interocular phase offsets (0–180°) and matching contrasts (2–32%). Our results revealed a complex interaction between contrast and interocular phase. At low contrasts, perceived contrast reduced monotonically with increasing phase offset, by up to a factor of 1.6. At higher contrasts the pattern was non-monotonic: perceived contrast was veridical for in-phase and antiphase conditions, and monocular presentation, but increased a little at intermediate phase angles. These findings challenge a recent model in which contrast perception is phase-invariant. The results were predicted by a binocular contrast gain control model. The model involves monocular gain controls with interocular suppression from positive and negative phase channels, followed by summation across eyes and then across space. Importantly, this model—applied to conditions with vertical disparity—has only a single (zero) disparity channel and embodies both fusion and suppression processes within a single framework. Public Library of Science 2012-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3317637/ /pubmed/22485185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034696 Text en Baker et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baker, Daniel H. Wallis, Stuart A. Georgeson, Mark A. Meese, Tim S. The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast |
title | The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast |
title_full | The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast |
title_short | The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast |
title_sort | effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22485185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakerdanielh theeffectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast AT wallisstuarta theeffectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast AT georgesonmarka theeffectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast AT meesetims theeffectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast AT bakerdanielh effectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast AT wallisstuarta effectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast AT georgesonmarka effectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast AT meesetims effectofinterocularphasedifferenceonperceivedcontrast |