Cargando…

Cellulose Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Comparative Effect on Bean Cell Cultures

The variety of bioassays developed to evaluate different inhibition responses for cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors makes it difficult to compare the results obtained. This work aims (i) to test a single inhibitory assay for comparing active concentrations of a set of putative cellulose biosynthesis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Angulo, Penélope, Alonso-Simón, Ana, Encina, Antonio, Álvarez, Jesús M., Acebes, José L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22489176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms13033685
_version_ 1782228611067019264
author García-Angulo, Penélope
Alonso-Simón, Ana
Encina, Antonio
Álvarez, Jesús M.
Acebes, José L.
author_facet García-Angulo, Penélope
Alonso-Simón, Ana
Encina, Antonio
Álvarez, Jesús M.
Acebes, José L.
author_sort García-Angulo, Penélope
collection PubMed
description The variety of bioassays developed to evaluate different inhibition responses for cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors makes it difficult to compare the results obtained. This work aims (i) to test a single inhibitory assay for comparing active concentrations of a set of putative cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors and (ii) to characterize their effect on cell wall polysaccharides biosynthesis following a short-term exposure. For the first aim, dose-response curves for inhibition of dry-weight increase following a 30 days exposure of bean callus-cultured cells to these inhibitors were obtained. The compound concentration capable of inhibiting dry weight increase by 50% compared to control (I(50)) ranged from subnanomolar (CGA 325′615) to nanomolar (AE F150944, flupoxam, triazofenamide and oxaziclomefone) and micromolar (dichlobenil, quinclorac and compound 1) concentrations. In order to gain a better understanding of the effect of the putative inhibitors on cell wall polysaccharides biosynthesis, the [(14)C]glucose incorporation into cell wall fractions was determined after a 20 h exposure of cell suspensions to each inhibitor at their I(50) value. All the inhibitors tested decreased glucose incorporation into cellulose with the exception of quinclorac, which increased it. In some herbicide treatments, reduction in the incorporation into cellulose was accompanied by an increase in the incorporation into other fractions. In order to appreciate the effect of the inhibitors on cell wall partitioning, a cluster and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on the relative contribution of [(14)C]glucose incorporation into the different cell wall fractions were performed, and three groups of compounds were identified. The first group included quinclorac, which increased glucose incorporation into cellulose; the second group consisted of compound 1, CGA 325′615, oxaziclomefone and AE F150944, which decreased the relative glucose incorporation into cellulose but increased it into tightly-bound cellulose fractions; and the third group, comprising flupoxam, triazofenamide and dichlobenil, decreased the relative glucose incorporation into cellulose and increased it into a pectin rich fraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3317736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33177362012-04-09 Cellulose Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Comparative Effect on Bean Cell Cultures García-Angulo, Penélope Alonso-Simón, Ana Encina, Antonio Álvarez, Jesús M. Acebes, José L. Int J Mol Sci Article The variety of bioassays developed to evaluate different inhibition responses for cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors makes it difficult to compare the results obtained. This work aims (i) to test a single inhibitory assay for comparing active concentrations of a set of putative cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors and (ii) to characterize their effect on cell wall polysaccharides biosynthesis following a short-term exposure. For the first aim, dose-response curves for inhibition of dry-weight increase following a 30 days exposure of bean callus-cultured cells to these inhibitors were obtained. The compound concentration capable of inhibiting dry weight increase by 50% compared to control (I(50)) ranged from subnanomolar (CGA 325′615) to nanomolar (AE F150944, flupoxam, triazofenamide and oxaziclomefone) and micromolar (dichlobenil, quinclorac and compound 1) concentrations. In order to gain a better understanding of the effect of the putative inhibitors on cell wall polysaccharides biosynthesis, the [(14)C]glucose incorporation into cell wall fractions was determined after a 20 h exposure of cell suspensions to each inhibitor at their I(50) value. All the inhibitors tested decreased glucose incorporation into cellulose with the exception of quinclorac, which increased it. In some herbicide treatments, reduction in the incorporation into cellulose was accompanied by an increase in the incorporation into other fractions. In order to appreciate the effect of the inhibitors on cell wall partitioning, a cluster and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on the relative contribution of [(14)C]glucose incorporation into the different cell wall fractions were performed, and three groups of compounds were identified. The first group included quinclorac, which increased glucose incorporation into cellulose; the second group consisted of compound 1, CGA 325′615, oxaziclomefone and AE F150944, which decreased the relative glucose incorporation into cellulose but increased it into tightly-bound cellulose fractions; and the third group, comprising flupoxam, triazofenamide and dichlobenil, decreased the relative glucose incorporation into cellulose and increased it into a pectin rich fraction. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3317736/ /pubmed/22489176 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms13033685 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
García-Angulo, Penélope
Alonso-Simón, Ana
Encina, Antonio
Álvarez, Jesús M.
Acebes, José L.
Cellulose Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Comparative Effect on Bean Cell Cultures
title Cellulose Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Comparative Effect on Bean Cell Cultures
title_full Cellulose Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Comparative Effect on Bean Cell Cultures
title_fullStr Cellulose Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Comparative Effect on Bean Cell Cultures
title_full_unstemmed Cellulose Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Comparative Effect on Bean Cell Cultures
title_short Cellulose Biosynthesis Inhibitors: Comparative Effect on Bean Cell Cultures
title_sort cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors: comparative effect on bean cell cultures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22489176
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms13033685
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaangulopenelope cellulosebiosynthesisinhibitorscomparativeeffectonbeancellcultures
AT alonsosimonana cellulosebiosynthesisinhibitorscomparativeeffectonbeancellcultures
AT encinaantonio cellulosebiosynthesisinhibitorscomparativeeffectonbeancellcultures
AT alvarezjesusm cellulosebiosynthesisinhibitorscomparativeeffectonbeancellcultures
AT acebesjosel cellulosebiosynthesisinhibitorscomparativeeffectonbeancellcultures