Cargando…

Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries

AIM: Culture is becoming increasingly important in relation to end of life (EoL) care in a context of globalization, migration and European integration. We explore and compare socio-cultural issues that shape EoL care in seven European countries and critically appraise the existing research evidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gysels, Marjolein, Evans, Natalie, Meñaca, Arantza, Andrew, Erin, Toscani, Franco, Finetti, Sylvia, Pasman, H. Roeline, Higginson, Irene, Harding, Richard, Pool, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22509278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034188
_version_ 1782228650965336064
author Gysels, Marjolein
Evans, Natalie
Meñaca, Arantza
Andrew, Erin
Toscani, Franco
Finetti, Sylvia
Pasman, H. Roeline
Higginson, Irene
Harding, Richard
Pool, Robert
author_facet Gysels, Marjolein
Evans, Natalie
Meñaca, Arantza
Andrew, Erin
Toscani, Franco
Finetti, Sylvia
Pasman, H. Roeline
Higginson, Irene
Harding, Richard
Pool, Robert
author_sort Gysels, Marjolein
collection PubMed
description AIM: Culture is becoming increasingly important in relation to end of life (EoL) care in a context of globalization, migration and European integration. We explore and compare socio-cultural issues that shape EoL care in seven European countries and critically appraise the existing research evidence on cultural issues in EoL care generated in the different countries. METHODS: We scoped the literature for Germany, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy and Portugal, carrying out electronic searches in 16 international and country-specific databases and handsearches in 17 journals, bibliographies of relevant papers and webpages. We analysed the literature which was unearthed, in its entirety and by type (reviews, original studies, opinion pieces) and conducted quantitative analyses for each country and across countries. Qualitative techniques generated themes and sub-themes. RESULTS: A total of 868 papers were reviewed. The following themes facilitated cross-country comparison: setting, caregivers, communication, medical EoL decisions, minority ethnic groups, and knowledge, attitudes and values of death and care. The frequencies of themes varied considerably between countries. Sub-themes reflected issues characteristic for specific countries (e.g. culture-specific disclosure in the southern European countries). The work from the seven European countries concentrates on cultural traditions and identities, and there was almost no evidence on ethnic minorities. CONCLUSION: This scoping review is the first comparative exploration of the cultural differences in the understanding of EoL care in these countries. The diverse body of evidence that was identified on socio-cultural issues in EoL care, reflects clearly distinguishable national cultures of EoL care, with differences in meaning, priorities, and expertise in each country. The diverse ways that EoL care is understood and practised forms a necessary part of what constitutes best evidence for the improvement of EoL care in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3317929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33179292012-04-16 Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries Gysels, Marjolein Evans, Natalie Meñaca, Arantza Andrew, Erin Toscani, Franco Finetti, Sylvia Pasman, H. Roeline Higginson, Irene Harding, Richard Pool, Robert PLoS One Research Article AIM: Culture is becoming increasingly important in relation to end of life (EoL) care in a context of globalization, migration and European integration. We explore and compare socio-cultural issues that shape EoL care in seven European countries and critically appraise the existing research evidence on cultural issues in EoL care generated in the different countries. METHODS: We scoped the literature for Germany, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy and Portugal, carrying out electronic searches in 16 international and country-specific databases and handsearches in 17 journals, bibliographies of relevant papers and webpages. We analysed the literature which was unearthed, in its entirety and by type (reviews, original studies, opinion pieces) and conducted quantitative analyses for each country and across countries. Qualitative techniques generated themes and sub-themes. RESULTS: A total of 868 papers were reviewed. The following themes facilitated cross-country comparison: setting, caregivers, communication, medical EoL decisions, minority ethnic groups, and knowledge, attitudes and values of death and care. The frequencies of themes varied considerably between countries. Sub-themes reflected issues characteristic for specific countries (e.g. culture-specific disclosure in the southern European countries). The work from the seven European countries concentrates on cultural traditions and identities, and there was almost no evidence on ethnic minorities. CONCLUSION: This scoping review is the first comparative exploration of the cultural differences in the understanding of EoL care in these countries. The diverse body of evidence that was identified on socio-cultural issues in EoL care, reflects clearly distinguishable national cultures of EoL care, with differences in meaning, priorities, and expertise in each country. The diverse ways that EoL care is understood and practised forms a necessary part of what constitutes best evidence for the improvement of EoL care in the future. Public Library of Science 2012-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3317929/ /pubmed/22509278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034188 Text en Gysels et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gysels, Marjolein
Evans, Natalie
Meñaca, Arantza
Andrew, Erin
Toscani, Franco
Finetti, Sylvia
Pasman, H. Roeline
Higginson, Irene
Harding, Richard
Pool, Robert
Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries
title Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries
title_full Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries
title_fullStr Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries
title_full_unstemmed Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries
title_short Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries
title_sort culture and end of life care: a scoping exercise in seven european countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22509278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034188
work_keys_str_mv AT gyselsmarjolein cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT evansnatalie cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT menacaarantza cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT andrewerin cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT toscanifranco cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT finettisylvia cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT pasmanhroeline cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT higginsonirene cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT hardingrichard cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries
AT poolrobert cultureandendoflifecareascopingexerciseinseveneuropeancountries