Cargando…
What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition
Condorcet (1785) proposed that a majority vote drawn from individual, independent and fallible (but not totally uninformed) opinions provides near-perfect accuracy if the number of voters is adequately large. Research in social psychology has since then repeatedly demonstrated that collectives can a...
Autores principales: | Bahrami, Bahador, Olsen, Karsten, Bang, Dan, Roepstorff, Andreas, Rees, Geraint, Frith, Chris |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3318766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22492752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0420 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Together, Slowly but Surely: The Role of Social Interaction and Feedback on the Build-Up of Benefit in Collective Decision-Making
por: Bahrami, Bahador, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Does interaction matter? Testing whether a confidence heuristic can replace interaction in collective decision-making
por: Bang, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The Perceptual and Social Components of Metacognition
por: Pescetelli, Niccolo, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Collective Enumeration
por: Bahrami, Bahador, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
What decision-making models can tell us about tactile remapping
por: Albantakis, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2011)