Cargando…

Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models

In this paper, we describe some bounds and inequalities relating [Image: see text]-index, [Image: see text]-index, [Image: see text]-index, and generalized impact factor. We derive the bounds and inequalities relating these indexing parameters from their basic definitions and without assuming any co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Abbas, Ash Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22496760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033699
_version_ 1782228727903551488
author Abbas, Ash Mohammad
author_facet Abbas, Ash Mohammad
author_sort Abbas, Ash Mohammad
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we describe some bounds and inequalities relating [Image: see text]-index, [Image: see text]-index, [Image: see text]-index, and generalized impact factor. We derive the bounds and inequalities relating these indexing parameters from their basic definitions and without assuming any continuous model to be followed by any of them. We verify the theorems using citation data for five Price Medalists. We observe that the lower bound for [Image: see text]-index given by Theorem 2, [Image: see text], comes out to be more accurate as compared to Schubert-Glanzel relation [Image: see text] for a proportionality constant of [Image: see text], where [Image: see text] is the number of citations and [Image: see text] is the number of papers referenced. Also, the values of [Image: see text]-index obtained using Theorem 2 outperform those obtained using Egghe-Liang-Rousseau power law model for the given citation data of Price Medalists. Further, we computed the values of upper bound on [Image: see text]-index given by Theorem 3, [Image: see text], where [Image: see text] denotes the value of [Image: see text]-index. We observe that the upper bound on [Image: see text]-index given by Theorem 3 is reasonably tight for the given citation record of Price Medalists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3319552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33195522012-04-11 Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models Abbas, Ash Mohammad PLoS One Research Article In this paper, we describe some bounds and inequalities relating [Image: see text]-index, [Image: see text]-index, [Image: see text]-index, and generalized impact factor. We derive the bounds and inequalities relating these indexing parameters from their basic definitions and without assuming any continuous model to be followed by any of them. We verify the theorems using citation data for five Price Medalists. We observe that the lower bound for [Image: see text]-index given by Theorem 2, [Image: see text], comes out to be more accurate as compared to Schubert-Glanzel relation [Image: see text] for a proportionality constant of [Image: see text], where [Image: see text] is the number of citations and [Image: see text] is the number of papers referenced. Also, the values of [Image: see text]-index obtained using Theorem 2 outperform those obtained using Egghe-Liang-Rousseau power law model for the given citation data of Price Medalists. Further, we computed the values of upper bound on [Image: see text]-index given by Theorem 3, [Image: see text], where [Image: see text] denotes the value of [Image: see text]-index. We observe that the upper bound on [Image: see text]-index given by Theorem 3 is reasonably tight for the given citation record of Price Medalists. Public Library of Science 2012-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3319552/ /pubmed/22496760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033699 Text en Ash Mohammad Abbas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abbas, Ash Mohammad
Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models
title Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models
title_full Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models
title_fullStr Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models
title_full_unstemmed Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models
title_short Bounds and Inequalities Relating h-Index, g-Index, e-Index and Generalized Impact Factor: An Improvement over Existing Models
title_sort bounds and inequalities relating h-index, g-index, e-index and generalized impact factor: an improvement over existing models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22496760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033699
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasashmohammad boundsandinequalitiesrelatinghindexgindexeindexandgeneralizedimpactfactoranimprovementoverexistingmodels