Cargando…

The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices

“Ethics” is used as a label for a new kind of expertise in the field of science and technology. At the same time, it is not clear what ethical expertise consists in and what its political status in modern democracies can be. Starting from the “participatory turn” in recent social research and policy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schicktanz, Silke, Schweda, Mark, Wynne, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9321-4
_version_ 1782228755126681600
author Schicktanz, Silke
Schweda, Mark
Wynne, Brian
author_facet Schicktanz, Silke
Schweda, Mark
Wynne, Brian
author_sort Schicktanz, Silke
collection PubMed
description “Ethics” is used as a label for a new kind of expertise in the field of science and technology. At the same time, it is not clear what ethical expertise consists in and what its political status in modern democracies can be. Starting from the “participatory turn” in recent social research and policy, we will argue that bioethical reasoning has to include public views of and attitudes towards biomedicine. We will sketch the outlines of a bioethical conception of “public understanding of ethics,” addressing three different issues: (a) the methodological relevance of moral questions and problems raised by lay persons in everyday life regarding biomedicine and technology, (b) the normative relevance of such lay moralities for the justification of ethical decisions, and (c) the necessity of public deliberation in this context. Finally, we draw conclusions in view of the concepts and methods such a conception of “public understanding of ethics” should employ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3319876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33198762012-04-05 The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices Schicktanz, Silke Schweda, Mark Wynne, Brian Med Health Care Philos Scientific Contribution “Ethics” is used as a label for a new kind of expertise in the field of science and technology. At the same time, it is not clear what ethical expertise consists in and what its political status in modern democracies can be. Starting from the “participatory turn” in recent social research and policy, we will argue that bioethical reasoning has to include public views of and attitudes towards biomedicine. We will sketch the outlines of a bioethical conception of “public understanding of ethics,” addressing three different issues: (a) the methodological relevance of moral questions and problems raised by lay persons in everyday life regarding biomedicine and technology, (b) the normative relevance of such lay moralities for the justification of ethical decisions, and (c) the necessity of public deliberation in this context. Finally, we draw conclusions in view of the concepts and methods such a conception of “public understanding of ethics” should employ. Springer Netherlands 2011-03-30 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3319876/ /pubmed/21448745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9321-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Scientific Contribution
Schicktanz, Silke
Schweda, Mark
Wynne, Brian
The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices
title The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices
title_full The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices
title_fullStr The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices
title_full_unstemmed The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices
title_short The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices
title_sort ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices
topic Scientific Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9321-4
work_keys_str_mv AT schicktanzsilke theethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices
AT schwedamark theethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices
AT wynnebrian theethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices
AT schicktanzsilke ethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices
AT schwedamark ethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices
AT wynnebrian ethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices