Cargando…
The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices
“Ethics” is used as a label for a new kind of expertise in the field of science and technology. At the same time, it is not clear what ethical expertise consists in and what its political status in modern democracies can be. Starting from the “participatory turn” in recent social research and policy...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9321-4 |
_version_ | 1782228755126681600 |
---|---|
author | Schicktanz, Silke Schweda, Mark Wynne, Brian |
author_facet | Schicktanz, Silke Schweda, Mark Wynne, Brian |
author_sort | Schicktanz, Silke |
collection | PubMed |
description | “Ethics” is used as a label for a new kind of expertise in the field of science and technology. At the same time, it is not clear what ethical expertise consists in and what its political status in modern democracies can be. Starting from the “participatory turn” in recent social research and policy, we will argue that bioethical reasoning has to include public views of and attitudes towards biomedicine. We will sketch the outlines of a bioethical conception of “public understanding of ethics,” addressing three different issues: (a) the methodological relevance of moral questions and problems raised by lay persons in everyday life regarding biomedicine and technology, (b) the normative relevance of such lay moralities for the justification of ethical decisions, and (c) the necessity of public deliberation in this context. Finally, we draw conclusions in view of the concepts and methods such a conception of “public understanding of ethics” should employ. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3319876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33198762012-04-05 The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices Schicktanz, Silke Schweda, Mark Wynne, Brian Med Health Care Philos Scientific Contribution “Ethics” is used as a label for a new kind of expertise in the field of science and technology. At the same time, it is not clear what ethical expertise consists in and what its political status in modern democracies can be. Starting from the “participatory turn” in recent social research and policy, we will argue that bioethical reasoning has to include public views of and attitudes towards biomedicine. We will sketch the outlines of a bioethical conception of “public understanding of ethics,” addressing three different issues: (a) the methodological relevance of moral questions and problems raised by lay persons in everyday life regarding biomedicine and technology, (b) the normative relevance of such lay moralities for the justification of ethical decisions, and (c) the necessity of public deliberation in this context. Finally, we draw conclusions in view of the concepts and methods such a conception of “public understanding of ethics” should employ. Springer Netherlands 2011-03-30 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3319876/ /pubmed/21448745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9321-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Contribution Schicktanz, Silke Schweda, Mark Wynne, Brian The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices |
title | The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices |
title_full | The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices |
title_fullStr | The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices |
title_full_unstemmed | The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices |
title_short | The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices |
title_sort | ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices |
topic | Scientific Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9321-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schicktanzsilke theethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices AT schwedamark theethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices AT wynnebrian theethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices AT schicktanzsilke ethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices AT schwedamark ethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices AT wynnebrian ethicsofpublicunderstandingofethicswhyandhowbioethicsexpertiseshouldincludepublicandpatientsvoices |